UK Punting user are ???

[Jawbreak]

Hi guys, This is a serious tongue in cheek question.

Are guys that use this Forum the elite of all UK
punters?

My reason for this question is, after checking out profile after profile on Adult work, I have noticed that so many Working Girls have 100+ Positive reviews, but are piss poor at delivering a decent service. There are a few exceptions to this as we all know but on the whole there are so many poor service providers floating around with high feedback.

I think the guys that go to these girls just accept a shit service and then rate it on what they are used to receiving.
Where as us savvy guys that review girls from another Elite Punters view expect higher standards of service, because we form an unbiased
mind set of what we would recommend and openly compare notes on the service providers.

So back to the point UK Punting forum users I do think are a cut above the rest of the punting nation..
Lets keep up the good work guys.

 
 

[Goodfellow]

I think the guys that go to these girls just accept a shit service and then rate it on what they are used to receiving.

On AW punters just don't want a negative in return, because girls might not see them then.

Therefore
AW positive = meeting happened and I wasn't robbed
UKP positive = meeting was actually good

[NIK]

You don't have to be an experienced punter to realise 99% of AW reviews are fairy stories.
Same with reviews on agencies websites. 

[pumps]

You don't have to be an experienced punter to realise 99% of AW reviews are fairy stories.
Same with reviews on agencies websites. 

Indeed, The field reports are sickening at times..... 

[Jawbreak]

On AW punters just don't want a negative in return, because girls might not see them then.

Therefore
AW positive = meeting happened and I wasn't robbed
UKP positive = meeting was actually good

My first punt from AW was piss poor, bait and switch i left feedback accordingly and received several negative feedback in return, which really didnt help my punting.
I then found UK Punting and the tables turned, when i started reviewing my punts on here.
Now if i get a shit service I tell the girl I post reviews on UK Punting (after the meet) not before the meet.
Also 90% of my meets happen after reading info on here.
the other 10% are normally taking one for the greater good.
I dont, cant and wont follow any reviews on AW unless i see a familiar nickname on a AW review.
 

[Jawbreak]

Indeed, The field reports are sickening at times..... 

I am honoured to have a true veteran comment on my post 

[threechilliman]

I don't class myself, or anyone else as an Elite punter just because we're on here. Savvy maybe, but Elite, no. If there's a girl you like the look of, a bit of homework on here generally leads to a decent punt. Not always, as I've found out, but on the whole. One thing I look for in reviews is consistency - when pretty much everyone who's seen her says much the same thing.

tcm

[smiley9]

I always take AW Feedback with a large pinch of salt and as for the Field Reports ???  Half the time its the girls themselves or one of their group or Sergei setting up fake AW profiles  I used to be fooled until I discovered UKP 

[webpunter]

+1  I would add that checking out the reviews on AW - combined with research on here can work on the odd occasion.  As mentioned above most of the AW FB is Hans Christian Andersen, however there are some good-uns.  Typically longer established AW burds with 100+ FB, where those reviewing stack up [with a broad spread of pukka FB.  And they don't write loved up bollocks]
Just now & again i like to go off piste & take a flyer with an AW newbie [ish].  This gets the adrenalin pumping.  They've all got to start somewhere.  Easier if they have a twat page for example. 

I don't class myself, or anyone else as an Elite punter just because we're on here. Savvy maybe, but Elite, no. If there's a girl you like the look of, a bit of homework on here generally leads to a decent punt. Not always, as I've found out, but on the whole. One thing I look for in reviews is consistency - when pretty much everyone who's seen her says much the same thing.

tcm

[mrfishyfoo]

Punting IMHO is about having the balls to walk into a meet and get what you want for your hard earned.

As far as I am concerned research is king BUT you can't always do preliminary research as that immediately excludes newbies. Just because a lass has loads of reports on here and shit loads of AWank feedback doesn't mean the punts nailed on as YMMV. I have punted with newbies who have blown me away and I have punted with established lasses with loads of reports on here and 500+ feedback on Awank and walked away thinking WTF !!!

So yes being a member of a UKP gives an edge and it's greatly appreciated BUT when it comes to the punt there's only me and the lass in the room. If we click we click and if we don't I walk.

[webpunter]

Some pukka observations

Punting IMHO is about having the balls to walk into a meet and get what you want for your hard earned.

This is what makes it fun

I have punted with newbies who have blown me away and I have punted with established lasses with loads of reports on here and 500+ feedback on Awank and walked away thinking WTF !!!

Same for me.  Its the excitement of not knowing what to expect & it all works out rather well - typically with burds who are new to the game & not jaded.  I tend in the main to avoid the heavily reviewed burds - mainly coz they are older / relatively expensive.  And pics taken say 5 years ago hardly help

So yes being a member of a UKP gives an edge

You've hit the nail on the head
I also do stuff like searching for the mobile no. & GRIS.  Research is part & parcel of punting    Proper Preparation & Planning [helps] Prevent Piss Poor Punting [the 7P's]

[bobbles1945]

You've hit the nail on the head
 I also do stuff like searching for the mobile no. & GRIS.

. GRIS?? Is this urban slang?

[Mansell]

Being on here and reading everything has certianly made me a more savvy punter as I suspect is has all of us.

[Corus Boy]

Google Reverse Image Search

Or you can use External Link/Members Only

[Keema]

And tineye is nothing to do with your jap's eye

[HughJardon]

And tineye is nothing to do with your jap's eye

Unless it's on C3P0's cock 

[Game on]

I wouldn't say i was an elite punter, but say what i think for the good or bad, and walk from a punt if i feel the need too.

UKP does give you great advice 

[mrdiamond77]

Being on here and reading everything has certianly made me a more savvy punter as I suspect is has all of us.

This is true for me.  I had quite a few shit punts in 2015 before I joined this site, quite a lot were Romanians.  This site has made me more savvy and selective and 2016 has been a great punting year for me thanks to UKP. 

[Sedition]

Speaking as a relative newcomer to this site, albeit a long term isolated punter, I think what I see on here is a collective savviness, which, for me is extremely welcome.
Discovering shared experience with folk here is reassuring, and all questions (eventually) generally get sensible answers.
The core strength of this site though is, and will remain, the reviews.
Something I'm looking forwards to contributing to in the new year.
Elite? Dunno.
Better informed? Certainly.

[Juilius_Sneezer]

As with anything in life you can be well rewarded for doing you're research and making informed choices. This site allows you to do just that and can save you a lot of bad experiences.

That said I have great respect for the ones who have gone out there to test the waters and come back to give us the good or bad news. Some of us stay in the cave and some go hunting as they say!

[webpunter]

Tineye / Jap-eye  Using GRIS on AW pics doesn't work on Google AFAIAA.  Better results with Firefox as possible to get the pics onto jpeg format.  The mobile no. search can show the WG advertising elsewhere & if the case these pics tend to produce better results.  Most of the time i can't be arsed.  And still make basic errors - like not checking the veri pic [as hardly any profiles show these].  Putting the mobile into smartphone & then checking WhatsA is quick & easy

[The_Don]

My reason for this question is, after checking out profile after profile on Adult work, I have noticed that so many Working Girls have 100+ Positive reviews, but are piss poor at delivering a decent service. There are a few exceptions to this as we all know but on the whole there are so many poor service providers floating around with high feedback.

I learned to take W/G, feed back on A/W with a pinch of salt. A system that's to open to abuse and misuse IMO

Currently I have 0 feed back on my A/W account (and its going to stay that way of some time). That alone states how much faith I have, in that system.

[stevedave]

I don't class myself, or anyone else as an Elite punter just because we're on here. Savvy maybe, but Elite, no.

Nail on head.

At the end of the day, we spend a lot of money on this hobby, so anyone not doing proper research and just hoping for the best is bloody daft IMHO. UKP is a wonderful research tool, and I for one am bloody glad I stumbled across it!

[smiths]

You don't have to be an experienced punter to realise 99% of AW reviews are fairy stories.
Same with reviews on agencies websites. 

Indeed, and as said above and as many punters have said they wouldn't give a bad WG negative feedback on A/W in case she gives them the same back in revenge which could put a future WG off. Absolutely no use to other punters which is where UKP comes in, and thank fuck you founded it when you did, or many punters would be having a lot more bad punts.

A/W is like wading knee deep in shit looking for a gem and has got a lot worse in the last 18 months in my experience.

[Chuckman]

More savvy than anything else on the whole due to knowing the value of a pound and what I had to do in order to get it.

AW reviews are generally in three categories: Mills & Boon, "she touched my winky and it was wonderful!" brigade and the "treat her like a princess lot"; all of them make the reviews of dubious value. The only time they become useful are the negatives or you can't read them, either way it tells you to avoid seeing her.

UKP has helped me a lot as it gives me a good idea of who to see and avoid. I have found it very useful when flicking through the WGs on AW and see one that interests me and go "she looks good, wonder if there's anything about her on UKP?". Doing this has saved me a lot of cash over the time I've been on here.

[cueball]

Elite?? Not me nor anybody else on here neither.

I'll say this though... I've learnt a lot since joining and I'm still learning.

It's all about contribution imo on here. If nobody put in then there would be nothing to take out.

I've taken out way more than I've put in, ukp has saved me a small fortune in cash, time and experiences.

I only stumbled in by googling punting.

I also googled hair replacement but that's been nowhere near as successful 

[chrishornx]

You don't have to be an experienced punter to realise 99% of AW reviews are fairy stories.
Same with reviews on agencies websites. 

I am a little 'stuck on the fence' with this issue.

Yes certainly many reviews on AW and agency sites may often be  'cautious' or 'neutral' in nature, flawed through doubts of potential repercussions and as such often avoid anything detrimental about a punt for the clear reason that the reviewer is keen not to draw flack from AW escorts who may avoid someone that 'dishes out' criticism. A site used as much by escorts as punters is inevitably going to have that stigma and that is where many perceive UKP to have an advantage for punters

However it is possibly a slightly misplaced perception that UK Punting allows us a sheltered platform that encourages us to more freely put forward true opinions of escort services  without fear of retribution.

I know of various escorts that regularly visit UK punting to see what is being said and whilst some openly do so  I can think of several, from my limited range of escorts visited,  that admit they do so under the pseudonym of a punters name, posing as 'one of us', to gain insight into what is 'really being said'.

 so in reality we have no immunity and whilst UKP does perhaps encourage more honest opinions on escorts it is by no means immune from escort scrutiny 

UKP certainly has a very valuable place in a punters internet life and helps us become more savvy and knowledgeable about a potential meet but Chilliman is right that it in no way  are UKP users  elite

[OldAdmin]

External Link/Members Only
If you click the 'By Date Created' tab on that AW page you'll get the most recent posted Field Reports.
Going through the list of those 100 field reports there is not a single negative one!

[chrishornx]

External Link/Members Only
If you click the 'By Date Created' tab on that AW page you'll get the most recent posted Field Reports.
Going through the list of those 100 field reports there is not a single negative one!

A very fair observation that amplifies the point made by several UKP users that there is a slight fear factor about posting a negative report on AW

Is it right that a review on AW has to be seen by the escort first before it is posted?

 I have done reviews in the past (genuinely positive ones) that don't appear for days and I have actually sent a txt to the escort reminding them to accept the review so it can appear on their profile. This may possibly mean many negative reports get sifted out and never posted if it has to be approved by the escort first - who in their right mind would let a negative report go on their profile.
 
Has anybody ever done a really negative, damming review and had it appear, and remain on an AW profile?

I would imagine many escorts on AW are visited by, amongst others, discerning UKP users without actually using the AW booking system ( I indeed have a booking for tomorrow made purely by txt, no AW booking system involved) and in such circumstances the realistic option for subsequently leaving a review, disparaging or praiseworthy  relies upon sites such as UKP. I would suspect a high percentage of UKP reviews relate to AW escorts 

[OldAdmin]

Unless changed recently, an AW Field Report will first need to be approved by the site operators (takes 12-24 hours) before it shows on the page I linked earlier, but it won't show on the WG profile until she selects it to show. Obviously nearly all will not show a negative FR on their profile.
That's why some use my earlier link to search the profile name to get a list of ALL FRs posted, whether they show on the profile itself or not. But still, nearly all are positive anyway.
In comparision, this is UKP stats for reviews (past 30 days):
21% Negative
11% Neutral