Cherrys Manchester £80 per hour

[Pepsiii]

Had a look at Cherrys website prices look excellent at £80 for 1hr, will be checking it out soon, what's the set up like inside, the picture of the exterior looks grotty like a back alley entrance, is it bang in the city centre?

[ziggy1969]

Yes, it is very central, between the Northern Quarter and Piccadilly Gardens. And yes, the back alley in which it is situated is a bit grotty.

Manchester has a fair few of these £80 an hour parlours and some charging a bit more. One thing I have done is put my head round the door of Cherrys, Piccadilly Club and Cosmopolitan which are all quite central before making my choice.

[Pepsiii]

At £80 for 1hr which is a fantastic rate, will the girls let you cum as many times as you can in that 1hr? What are the rooms like inside?

Yes, it is very central, between the Northern Quarter and Piccadilly Gardens. And yes, the back alley in which it is situated is a bit grotty.

Manchester has a fair few of these £80 an hour parlours and some charging a bit more. One thing I have done is put my head round the door of Cherrys, Piccadilly Club and Cosmopolitan which are all quite central before making my choice.

[NigelF]

I've never been so I should probably just shut up but from what I've read on here, it doesn't sound like the girls are very good (although it depends what you're looking for). A cheap shit punt is still a shit punt. To be fair though, I think the main issue I've seen on here is fake pictures (i.e. of totally different girls, e.g. pornstars), I've not noticed many actual reviews or even comments on particular girls so it would be great if someone could do some of those (or link to ones that already exist). 

[Goldfinch]

Existing reviews for cherrys:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=109220.msg1276531#msg1276531

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=80139.msg996154#msg996154

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=89576.msg1092728#msg1092728

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=102133.msg1209178#msg1209178

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76821.msg960859#msg960859

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=80617.msg1001164#msg1001164

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=90876.msg1105228#msg1105228

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=123949.msg1406388#msg1406388

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=126471.msg1431470#msg1431470

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=78575.msg978873#msg978873

[NigelF]

Nice one!

Seems to confirm my thoughts about the service. I tend to like GFE with plenty of kissing even in parlours and it doesn't seem like that's on offer. Tango does suggest otherwise with a couple of his reviews but looking at all his reviews he frankly has far too many positives (hardly any negatives) and they're all of parlour girls. I don't really mean to shit on the guy but frankly there aren't that many good parlour girls! I would say he doesn't look for much in the way of GFE/kissing but it seems he does (in a lot of his reviews). For the girls that I've seen which he's reviewed I've never got anywhere near as good a service so unfortunately I tend to take his reviews with a pinch of salt.

To be fair, the service will depend on girl but since I know the descriptions on their website can't be trusted, it's much too big a risk to book someone without reading a positive review of the girl on here first.

[Goldfinch]

Nice one!

 

[CoreyTrevor]

I paid a visit last weekend, it's not too bad from the outside, fairly discrete back street entrance, don't think I got noticed entering or leaving. It's in the back streets around Hilton Street/Dale Street, near Piccadilly Gardens. It's a bit weird inside, steel gated entrance down some steps, pretty dark and gloomy inside, felt like I was in an Arnie film (Total Recall or The Running Man lol). Seems pretty well run though, good receptionist and the girls hang around in the reception area so you have a clear choice. This was daytime (afternoon) so pretty quiet. I chose (badly) Claire, who is supposedly the Claire that was at Sandys, I can't say for sure, but I seriously doubt she's the Claire that WAS at Sandys. To be fair, all the services were available, kissing, OWO (extra), RO etc. and it was a good service for the price. BUT I thought she was a bit rough, in a chavvy way and the body was far from great! I can't see that she would have held down a regular place on the Sandys rota. She had a tattoo of a pink set of lips on her right arse cheek, if anyone can confirm this is consistent with the Claire from SS? However, on the way out I noticed 2 other girls, Mercedez, also stated to be ex Sandys and I would believe that, she looked fit (not like her website photos, but blonde and fit) and another girl called Stacia and she looked gorgeous (young, petite brunette!! I wish I'd booked her upon reflection, she looked stunning, might just be worth another visit to see her, if nothing else 

[Kriss]

I paid a visit last weekend, it's not too bad from the outside, fairly discrete back street entrance, don't think I got noticed entering or leaving. It's in the back streets around Hilton Street/Dale Street, near Piccadilly Gardens. It's a bit weird inside, steel gated entrance down some steps, pretty dark and gloomy inside, felt like I was in an Arnie film (Total Recall or The Running Man lol). Seems pretty well run though, good receptionist and the girls hang around in the reception area so you have a clear choice. This was daytime (afternoon) so pretty quiet. I chose (badly) Claire, who is supposedly the Claire that was at Sandys, I can't say for sure, but I seriously doubt she's the Claire that WAS at Sandys. To be fair, all the services were available, kissing, OWO (extra), RO etc. and it was a good service for the price. BUT I thought she was a bit rough, in a chavvy way and the body was far from great! I can't see that she would have held down a regular place on the Sandys rota. She had a tattoo of a pink set of lips on her right arse cheek, if anyone can confirm this is consistent with the Claire from SS? However, on the way out I noticed 2 other girls, Mercedez, also stated to be ex Sandys and I would believe that, she looked fit (not like her website photos, but blonde and fit) and another girl called Stacia and she looked gorgeous (young, petite brunette!! I wish I'd booked her upon reflection, she looked stunning, might just be worth another visit to see her, if nothing else 

Seems to me that you picked the wrong girl (please correct me if I'm wrong). Anyway, I've been to Cherry's and I would say that it's not bad VFM. I wouldn't ever go there after dark simply because it's city centre. In any case, I'm a daylight shagger by nature. There has always been a decent selection of girls and I have had girls who looked a lot like their website pics. I've had shit punts with indies as well as at parlours. What can be off putting about indies is the choice - take it or leave it - but at parlours you usually have a choice. Coming up to me next punt - one day next week - and I still don't know whether to go for indy or parlour. Any suggestions for Manchester, Salford area? 

[Goldfinch]

Any suggestions for Manchester, Salford area? 

External Link/Members Only

[CoreyTrevor]

Seems to me that you picked the wrong girl (please correct me if I'm wrong). Anyway, I've been to Cherry's and I would say that it's not bad VFM. I wouldn't ever go there after dark simply because it's city centre. In any case, I'm a daylight shagger by nature. There has always been a decent selection of girls and I have had girls who looked a lot like their website pics. I've had shit punts with indies as well as at parlours. What can be off putting about indies is the choice - take it or leave it - but at parlours you usually have a choice. Coming up to me next punt - one day next week - and I still don't know whether to go for indy or parlour. Any suggestions for Manchester, Salford area? 

No correction required, I DID pick the wrong girl and it was a school boy error really! I had seen that "Claire ex Sandy's" was on the rota that day, I'd wanted to see her at Sandy's and didn't get the chance, so it was in my head that I would book her if she was available, that was the mistake! I actually had the choice of all 3 girls and the other 2 looked miles better, it's crazy but I picked her anyway and later regretted it. Like I said, to be fair, the service was good and she's a nice enough girl (the BJ was superb!) but I just didn't fancy her at all, it is dark in there so it's an easy mistake to make!

I didn't book with her, so I can't comment on the service, but "Stacia" did look gorgeous IMHO so you could maybe give her a shot? With her looks and at that price, probably not a bad shout 

[Kriss]

External Link/Members Only

Thanks - any particular girl(s)?

[sandy2000]

I have been to Cherrys many a time when it was Bentleys as well and it's hit and miss with the service provided.

Some of the girls are like robots just going through the motions and they can't tell a word of the northern accent, but others have been a great laugh and good service.

From what I've experienced it is a basic parlour service but I've had some good kinky times there again depending on the girl.

She is not there anymore, but there was a girl called Tanya who was stunning and could take a real good pounding. Might have to see what the line up these days is...

[george r]

never been but not sure if some of the girls on the website do work there ? Rio was on the rota Friday there but was actually working in LM in bury ? 

[Goldfinch]

Thanks - any particular girl(s)?

I think it depends on the type of girl you normally go for-my particular niche is slim and early twenties-so daisy would fit the bill and has 3 positive reviews on here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152356.msg1661256#msg1661256

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146024.msg1604962#msg1604962

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=150543.msg1645155#msg1645155


 Molly has 3 positive reviews,but is slightly larger.



Good luck whoever you choose. 

[Goldfinch]

Just to add-there's a current thread going on one of Molly's negative reviews-so you may wish to look at the photos on sheridans website and take it from there and maybe choose someone else.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=153407.0

[Kriss]

I think it depends on the type of girl you normally go for-my particular niche is slim and early twenties-so daisy would fit the bill and has 3 positive reviews on here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=152356.msg1661256#msg1661256

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=146024.msg1604962#msg1604962

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=150543.msg1645155#msg1645155

Molly has 3 positive reviews,but is slightly larger.

Good luck whoever you choose. 

Just to add-there's a current thread going on one of Molly's negative reviews-so you may wish to look at the photos on sheridans website and take it from there and maybe choose someone else.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=153407.0

Thank you Goldfinch for the trouble you've taken over this. I like a girl with a big-ish arse and small-ish tits. Unfortunately Daisy is too small in all departments, and Molly is too big. I'll find something that suits my taste (should not be difficult coz I'm not too particular)  and post a FR.

Thanks again m8 

[Goldfinch]

Thank you Goldfinch for the trouble you've taken over this. I like a girl with a big-ish arse and small-ish tits. Unfortunately Daisy is too small in all departments, and Molly is too big. I'll find something that suits my taste (should not be difficult coz I'm not too particular)  and post a FR.

Thanks again m8 

 

No problem -just to confuse you even more,these 2 are popular with plenty of choice if your willing to travel to bury:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[con-a-ser]

Nice one!

Seems to confirm my thoughts about the service. I tend to like GFE with plenty of kissing even in parlours and it doesn't seem like that's on offer. Tango does suggest otherwise with a couple of his reviews but looking at all his reviews he frankly has far too many positives (hardly any negatives) and they're all of parlour girls. I don't really mean to shit on the guy but frankly there aren't that many good parlour girls! I would say he doesn't look for much in the way of GFE/kissing but it seems he does (in a lot of his reviews). For the girls that I've seen which he's reviewed I've never got anywhere near as good a service so unfortunately I tend to take his reviews with a pinch of salt.

To be fair, the service will depend on girl but since I know the descriptions on their website can't be trusted, it's much too big a risk to book someone without reading a positive review of the girl on here first.

Well I think a lot of that deends on your approach to the parlour & time of visits
I know I have been Cherry's one prior to it been closed has bentleys (which speaks volumes due to the number of EE girls they have) I know this has one or Two English girls & one did she she was busy has guys picked her to AVOID taking the risk & expecting to get a good service rather than a lot of the I don't kiss EE style etc
That been said I would still see those girls elsewhere where it is all inclusive & avoid the owo , extra, Kissing extra, RO extra risk
But that is ok for those who know this & not the piss head walking in off the street

Back to Tango I think you will find he had posted more negative reports elsewhere prior to the creation of this place of prior to us becoming members of here 

[Tango]

Well I think a lot of that deends on your approach to the parlour & time of visits
I know I have been Cherry's one prior to it been closed has bentleys (which speaks volumes due to the number of EE girls they have) I know this has one or Two English girls & one did she she was busy has guys picked her to AVOID taking the risk & expecting to get a good service rather than a lot of the I don't kiss EE style etc
That been said I would still see those girls elsewhere where it is all inclusive & avoid the owo , extra, Kissing extra, RO extra risk
But that is ok for those who know this & not the piss head walking in off the street

Back to Tango I think you will find he had posted more negative reports elsewhere prior to the creation of this place of prior to us becoming members of here

That's right Cherry's is basically Bentleys under a new name after they were closed down. They have lots of EE girls and share a couple of English ladies who can be seen all inclusive at another place not too far away, for cheaper too.

Unsure why Nigel F feels it necessary to have a dig at me when only two of those reports are by myself and one is of a highly rated girl (Chloe who was also at cosmo) who even the smelliest, ugliest and most annoying punter would find it difficult to get a bad service from.

If he wants to take my reports with a pinch of salt and doesn't think I have wrote enough bad ones that's fine but he needs to remember this isn't a dick measuring competition on who can write the most bad feedback and I can only report as honest and accurate as I can. I have been doing this a long time, long before UK Punting was around, I chose to start using this forum because I liked how it was a punters board. if Nigel F realised this he would probably find more negative reports written by me than he has written in total so ... External Link/Members Only 

Nigel F if you are having lesser experiences with the same girls reported positively by others maybe something needs work, maybe hygiene or attitude aren't up to scratch? Don't call out other people without justification or evidence, it's not good manners.

[Tango]

My advice on this is to set expectations

If your going for a cheap punt for £35 - £40 in the city centre it is more than likely it will be a EE girl who has never even heard of GFE so if you get it, its a bonus.

If you want a GFE service go to La Maison, Cheshire Elite or even GFE Bury. If you just want a quick bonk with a hot EE and OW go city centre. If you want all inclusive with a naughty service without worrying about extras go Sheridans. Its common sense really.

Indies are not my forte but saying that parlour girls are all shit is bollocks IMO.

[Pepsiii]

Yes that's Claire SS with the pink lips on her ass, your seriously saying she's a shit punt, that might explain her jumping from place to place, why not write a review up?

I paid a visit last weekend, it's not too bad from the outside, fairly discrete back street entrance, don't think I got noticed entering or leaving. It's in the back streets around Hilton Street/Dale Street, near Piccadilly Gardens. It's a bit weird inside, steel gated entrance down some steps, pretty dark and gloomy inside, felt like I was in an Arnie film (Total Recall or The Running Man lol). Seems pretty well run though, good receptionist and the girls hang around in the reception area so you have a clear choice. This was daytime (afternoon) so pretty quiet. I chose (badly) Claire, who is supposedly the Claire that was at Sandys, I can't say for sure, but I seriously doubt she's the Claire that WAS at Sandys. To be fair, all the services were available, kissing, OWO (extra), RO etc. and it was a good service for the price. BUT I thought she was a bit rough, in a chavvy way and the body was far from great! I can't see that she would have held down a regular place on the Sandys rota. She had a tattoo of a pink set of lips on her right arse cheek, if anyone can confirm this is consistent with the Claire from SS? However, on the way out I noticed 2 other girls, Mercedez, also stated to be ex Sandys and I would believe that, she looked fit (not like her website photos, but blonde and fit) and another girl called Stacia and she looked gorgeous (young, petite brunette!! I wish I'd booked her upon reflection, she looked stunning, might just be worth another visit to see her, if nothing else 

[Pepsiii]

Good advice, can I add Cherrys has a few ex SS girls like Rio/Claire/Vogue, so a punter paying £80 for 1hr expects a good service from these girls. If these girls start offering below par service because it's £80 for 1hr then that's not good. I've yet to see Rio at Cherrys to compare her service level against when she's working at La Maison where I saw her.

My advice on this is to set expectations

If your going for a cheap punt for £35 - £40 in the city centre it is more than likely it will be a EE girl who has never even heard of GFE so if you get it, its a bonus.

If you want a GFE service go to La Maison, Cheshire Elite or even GFE Bury. If you just want a quick bonk with a hot EE and OW go city centre. If you want all inclusive with a naughty service without worrying about extras go Sheridans. Its common sense really.

Indies are not my forte but saying that parlour girls are all shit is bollocks IMO.

[Tango]

Good advice, can I add Cherrys has a few ex SS girls like Rio/Claire/Vogue, so a punter paying £80 for 1hr expects a good service from these girls. If these girls start offering below par service because it's £80 for 1hr then that's not good. I've yet to see Rio at Cherrys to compare her service level against when she's working at La Maison where I saw her.

I agree at £80 for an hour and possibly extra money (OWO, CIM etc) you should expect a better level from these girls. The problem that occurs sometimes from experience is breeding of bad behaviour. In lower end parlours when all the girls are sat talking in between clients and the majority give a shite service it rubs off on the better girls. In the better run parlours this is usually nipped in the bud and the majority keep their higher service level. SS used to get rid sharpish and LM doesn't keep bitchy girls.

It used to happen a lot at The Wonder Lounge (if anyone remembers that) the girls used to start and the service level deteriorated after a few weeks.

Vogue's level of service is hit and miss from my own and others experience, Claire probably offers the same service, she was rated high at Cosmo where she was prior to Sandy's (I didn't see her though she wasn't my type) and Not sure about Rio because she is swapping in between Indie and a few different parlous, she was in LM the other day.

[CoreyTrevor]

Yes that's Claire SS with the pink lips on her ass, your seriously saying she's a shit punt, that might explain her jumping from place to place, why not write a review up?

I will try to stick a review up when I get chance, I don't get a lot of time to do reviews so I tend to do a few at the same time, when I have spare time. If and when I do, it will be a neutral rather than a negative, just to point that out. Like I said, the service was good and by City centre parlour standards (and £80.00 an hour + extra for OWO £20.00) it was a very good service indeed, she explained early doors that she pretty much does it all ! It was the girl herself who was the let down IMHO. I just didn't think she was at all good looking enough to have been on the rota and raved about at Sandy's and her body wasn't great either, certainly not bad, just not as good as I expected. So to re-iterate, it wasn't a "shit punt" so to speak and I did enjoy the service at that price, I was just a little disappointed with the girl considering she's well talked-up! 

[Kriss]

My advice on this is to set expectations

If your going for a cheap punt for £35 - £40 in the city centre it is more than likely it will be a EE girl who has never even heard of GFE so if you get it, its a bonus.

If you want a GFE service go to La Maison, Cheshire Elite or even GFE Bury. If you just want a quick bonk with a hot EE and OW go city centre. If you want all inclusive with a naughty service without worrying about extras go Sheridans. Its common sense really.

Indies are not my forte but saying that parlour girls are all shit is bollocks IMO.

True. To put it crudely, to me a parlour punt is renting a fanny. If the fanny is surrounded by a good looking body I'll go for it, if not I'll walk. I've rarely rented a fanny for longer than 1/2 hour because that's how long it takes me to get my rocks off. Indies, because they charge more, are supposed to provide something extra; nicer place, a nicer atmosphere, conversation  but a fanny is a fanny when all is said and done. I've had indies that really should have been parlour girls and also the other way around. Don't get me wrong, I don't resent WGs, far from it. I love the idea of going to a place, handing over some brass and shagging a decent looking and, at least in my case, much younger woman, and then going to a nice pub for a pint. I just love it. And at £40 it's cheap enough to risk the odd below par fuck.

[Robert44]

If he wants to take my reports with a pinch of salt and doesn't think I have wrote enough bad ones that's fine but he needs to remember this isn't a dick measuring competition on who can write the most bad feedback and I can only report as honest and accurate as I can. I have been doing this a long time, long before UK Punting was around, I chose to start using this forum because I liked how it was a punters board.

No chance, I read your reports avidly and they have set me up with some really decent punts.

[Pepsiii]

I agree at £80 for the hour you'd expect a better service, looks like Claire is not giving a good service maybe due to the overall environment of the place, the girls don't want to put any effort in. Maybe explains why Claire is working there now, maybe she got kicked out of La Maison for offering low quality service.

I agree at £80 for an hour and possibly extra money (OWO, CIM etc) you should expect a better level from these girls. The problem that occurs sometimes from experience is breeding of bad behaviour. In lower end parlours when all the girls are sat talking in between clients and the majority give a shite service it rubs off on the better girls. In the better run parlours this is usually nipped in the bud and the majority keep their higher service level. SS used to get rid sharpish and LM doesn't keep bitchy girls.

It used to happen a lot at The Wonder Lounge (if anyone remembers that) the girls used to start and the service level deteriorated after a few weeks.

Vogue's level of service is hit and miss from my own and others experience, Claire probably offers the same service, she was rated high at Cosmo where she was prior to Sandy's (I didn't see her though she wasn't my type) and Not sure about Rio because she is swapping in between Indie and a few different parlous, she was in LM the other day.

[Tango]

She has been at various parlours since SS was closed. She wouldnt have stayed at Sandys if the level wasnt high.

Probs been around negativity too long in rougher spots. I wouldnt know i never saw her in room.

[SmoothieNeil]

Can be hit and miss at times but I do like the odd visit.

Best girls I remember,one was back in 2013 i think with a British girl in February who was a student at Uni and doing it to earn some cash, was quiet and spoke softly but very nice company and a really good shag and kissed nicely too, forget her name but saw her three times.

Other one in recent years was a Colombian called Jane, very curvy with a big bum, She made you feel welcome and put a lot of effort in, really enjoyed being with her too.

Quite tempted to pop in this weekend now!

[NigelF]

That's right Cherry's is basically Bentleys under a new name after they were closed down. They have lots of EE girls and share a couple of English ladies who can be seen all inclusive at another place not too far away, for cheaper too.

Unsure why Nigel F feels it necessary to have a dig at me when only two of those reports are by myself and one is of a highly rated girl (Chloe who was also at cosmo) who even the smelliest, ugliest and most annoying punter would find it difficult to get a bad service from.

If he wants to take my reports with a pinch of salt and doesn't think I have wrote enough bad ones that's fine but he needs to remember this isn't a dick measuring competition on who can write the most bad feedback and I can only report as honest and accurate as I can. I have been doing this a long time, long before UK Punting was around, I chose to start using this forum because I liked how it was a punters board. if Nigel F realised this he would probably find more negative reports written by me than he has written in total so ... External Link/Members Only 

Nigel F if you are having lesser experiences with the same girls reported positively by others maybe something needs work, maybe hygiene or attitude aren't up to scratch? Don't call out other people without justification or evidence, it's not good manners.

Nothing to do with a dick measuring contest. Although you seem to be the one engaging in that by by posting that video and pointing out how experienced you are and how many negatives you’ve written. A quick scroll through your reviews shows 122 reviews all of which positive except for 1 neutral and 5 negatives (apologies if I’ve missed some). Now presumably you’ve posted these negatives you refer to previously on a different site (and presumably they’re relatively out of date so you didn’t post them on here) but A) I have no idea of knowing where they are and they’re certainly no use if they’re not on here (which will apply to many others as well) and B) your reviews on here span from last year (although none this year) all the way back to September 2013. Now only 5 bad experiences in 3 years (out of over 122, presumably very much over 122) is nothing short of amazing and frankly a little unbelievable. I don’t imagine many other punters out there would say that over 95% of their parlour punts have been good/positive.

To be fair though I do believe you should have a much better success rate than the vast majority of others due to your experience and extensive knowledge of the names and reputations of a lot of the girls. You’ll also have realistic expectations. We also seem to be usually looking for slightly different things from most of our punts (although I am happy with occasional pump & dump). Nonetheless, I still think your “success rate” is a little far-fetched.

My reviews are written honestly and accurately. My hygiene and attitude is fine. I obviously know how to go about things, as evidenced by my numerous extremely positive reviews. I also don’t often have bad experiences where others have had good, indeed I’ve had positives where others have had negatives.

I think the reason why I picked on you because I recall reading 2 of your reviews for Holly at La Maison (both positive) as well as some praise from you in another but having a rather different experience myself. Around the same time someone posted something about being sceptical of some reviewers, especially those who only seem to post positives. I had a look at your reviews and was surprised to find that you seemed to fit description (although they weren’t talking about you) and I suppose it’s now stuck with me. On reflection, I do think this is very harsh because I only actually disagree with you about one girl. When I was scrolling through your reviews I noticed others which I did agree with, e.g. Sienna and Eden at SOS, Milly at LM, Alex at Piccadilly and possibly others that I’ve missed. So on that basis, 4 agreements vs 1 disagreement (albeit strong) I do think my experiences aren’t necessarily that dissimilar to yours. So I will now admit my criticism seems rather unjustified (especially based on my own experiences) although I still stand by my assessment of your overall “success rate”.

I don’t take pleasure in writing negatives but I do try to make sure I do a review of them all (as they are surely the most useful contribution one can make to this forum). Admittedly, I haven’t totally succeeded but they are almost all there. I don’t post all my positives or my neutrals (although that’s something I’ve been trying to work on lately as they’re often very helpful too). I’d also add that if you have so many negatives – then put them on here because they’re no use on an unreliable site that hardly anyone reads anyway. It’s also not hard to copy & paste. Of course though, if they’re grossly out of date then there’s probably little point. Unless you’ve not posted a lot of your negative experiences on here (since you started doing reviews on this site) then I stand by my criticism of your seemingly overly positive review record. I don't think it can just be explained by you picking well-established/safe girls (especially since many don't have any previous reviews - although I'm not sure about other sites although on those I'd be sceptical about reliability but admittedly you are in a much better position to judge that).

My advice on this is to set expectations

If your going for a cheap punt for £35 - £40 in the city centre it is more than likely it will be a EE girl who has never even heard of GFE so if you get it, its a bonus.

If you want a GFE service go to La Maison, Cheshire Elite or even GFE Bury. If you just want a quick bonk with a hot EE and OW go city centre. If you want all inclusive with a naughty service without worrying about extras go Sheridans. Its common sense really.

Indies are not my forte but saying that parlour girls are all shit is bollocks IMO.

I do agree with that. Although I didn't say parlour girls are all shit. I did however say there aren’t that many good parlour girls. I was mainly referring to ones that claim to offer GFE though as obviously there’s higher expectations with that and they don't always deliver (certainly not over 95% of the time). I think most parlour girls (as a general rule) would be a neutral or worse. Admittedly I don’t have many neutrals because I find them fairly hard to write and so I often give up (I am now trying harder though) but you only have 1.

Perhaps I'm a little harsh on most girls, especially the cheap ones or the ones at the parlours where you should have low expectations, nonetheless I still expect good enthusiasm during the shag but that's often lacking too.

[con-a-ser]

It’s also not hard to copy & paste. Of course though, if they’re grossly out of date then there’s probably little point. Unless you’ve not posted a lot of your negative experiences on here (since you started doing reviews on this site)

It is hard when reveiws are on a venue like TWL & the reports where moved so couldn't be used as evidence with the closure of the place & suspected activities occurring 

[con-a-ser]

they’re no use on an unreliable site that hardly anyone reads anyway.

I don't know Goldfinch doesn't seem to do to bad

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=130066

[NigelF]

I don't know Goldfinch doesn't seem to do to bad

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=130066

Yeah, it wasn't actually meant to be smart comment, more a genuinely ignorant comment. I don't know which site Tango's other reviews are on but I would imagine it is for the most part unreliable although of course some individual members will be reliable. I imagine I am correct about the site not having many views though, certainly compared to here.

Obviously I think Goldfinch is very helpful. To be fair, I think Tango is too but his review record on here really surprises me. 

[Goldfinch]

I don't know Goldfinch doesn't seem to do to bad

 

 

Knowledge is power 

[Tango]

Nothing to do with a dick measuring contest. Although you seem to be the one engaging in that by by posting that video and pointing out how experienced you are and how many negatives you’ve written. A quick scroll through your reviews shows 122 reviews all of which positive except for 1 neutral and 5 negatives (apologies if I’ve missed some). Now presumably you’ve posted these negatives you refer to previously on a different site (and presumably they’re relatively out of date so you didn’t post them on here) but A) I have no idea of knowing where they are and they’re certainly no use if they’re not on here (which will apply to many others as well) and B) your reviews on here span from last year (although none this year) all the way back to September 2013. Now only 5 bad experiences in 3 years (out of over 122, presumably very much over 122) is nothing short of amazing and frankly a little unbelievable. I don’t imagine many other punters out there would say that over 95% of their parlour punts have been good/positive.

To be fair though I do believe you should have a much better success rate than the vast majority of others due to your experience and extensive knowledge of the names and reputations of a lot of the girls. You’ll also have realistic expectations. We also seem to be usually looking for slightly different things from most of our punts (although I am happy with occasional pump & dump). Nonetheless, I still think your “success rate” is a little far-fetched.

My reviews are written honestly and accurately. My hygiene and attitude is fine. I obviously know how to go about things, as evidenced by my numerous extremely positive reviews. I also don’t often have bad experiences where others have had good, indeed I’ve had positives where others have had negatives.

I think the reason why I picked on you because I recall reading 2 of your reviews for Holly at La Maison (both positive) as well as some praise from you in another but having a rather different experience myself. Around the same time someone posted something about being sceptical of some reviewers, especially those who only seem to post positives. I had a look at your reviews and was surprised to find that you seemed to fit description (although they weren’t talking about you) and I suppose it’s now stuck with me. On reflection, I do think this is very harsh because I only actually disagree with you about one girl. When I was scrolling through your reviews I noticed others which I did agree with, e.g. Sienna and Eden at SOS, Milly at LM, Alex at Piccadilly and possibly others that I’ve missed. So on that basis, 4 agreements vs 1 disagreement (albeit strong) I do think my experiences aren’t necessarily that dissimilar to yours. So I will now admit my criticism seems rather unjustified (especially based on my own experiences) although I still stand by my assessment of your overall “success rate”.

I don’t take pleasure in writing negatives but I do try to make sure I do a review of them all (as they are surely the most useful contribution one can make to this forum). Admittedly, I haven’t totally succeeded but they are almost all there. I don’t post all my positives or my neutrals (although that’s something I’ve been trying to work on lately as they’re often very helpful too). I’d also add that if you have so many negatives – then put them on here because they’re no use on an unreliable site that hardly anyone reads anyway. It’s also not hard to copy & paste. Of course though, if they’re grossly out of date then there’s probably little point. Unless you’ve not posted a lot of your negative experiences on here (since you started doing reviews on this site) then I stand by my criticism of your seemingly overly positive review record. I don't think it can just be explained by you picking well-established/safe girls (especially since many don't have any previous reviews - although I'm not sure about other sites although on those I'd be sceptical about reliability but admittedly you are in a much better position to judge that).

I do agree with that. Although I didn't say parlour girls are all shit. I did however say there aren’t that many good parlour girls. I was mainly referring to ones that claim to offer GFE though as obviously there’s higher expectations with that and they don't always deliver (certainly not over 95% of the time). I think most parlour girls (as a general rule) would be a neutral or worse. Admittedly I don’t have many neutrals because I find them fairly hard to write and so I often give up (I am now trying harder though) but you only have 1.

Perhaps I'm a little harsh on most girls, especially the cheap ones or the ones at the parlours where you should have low expectations, nonetheless I still expect good enthusiasm during the shag but that's often lacking too.

Nigel F are you trying to mask your fraud report writing by calling someone else out?

 

It’s been a while since I posted any review of any kind regardless of outcome so the reason you decided to call me out doesn’t make any sense. Personally I have had suspicion you are a bit of a fantasist and make stuff up based on other people’s reviews, you rarely see new girls and your descriptions seem copied from other people’s reviews, basically, I don’t think you are real!!!

 

Unfortunately for you thinking that about me, I was in and about parlours that much that loads of people off here have met me and even seen me before or after getting my end away.

 

In the past I would rarely write up a neutral report and full blown negatives are quite rare, If I have had issues with any of the girls in parlours I would have also said something in the place at the time so the parlour would have had direct feedback too.  

 

You even prove a point, my descriptions are accurate and you chose to call me out incorrectly as you only disagree with one report of mine??? Again you’re not making sense. It doesn’t make sense that you decided to pick me out in the first place.

 

However

 

A) What I chose to write about has got nothing to do with you and

 

B) I don’t even know why I am explaining myself for you

 

Basically here’s what I think, you’re a fantasist that’s trying to cover his own back and picked the wrong poster because of lack of knowledge.

                                                                            

However if my suspicions are wrong and you are actually real without an attitude and with good hygiene like you say.  I still feel sorry for the girls who see you because if you waffle on in the room to the girls in person like you post on here in that boring dreary manner it’s no wonder you’re getting a worse experience than some people. You sound really, really boring.

 

Trot on anyway cos I don’t care if you’re not real or what you have to say, and if you want to ignore my reports that’s great!

 

xxx

[con-a-ser]

Knowledge is power 

I meant copying & pasting isn't really knowledge unless you believe what you have actually read

I will post comments that will seem more cryptic (the party thread, A topic me & Admin discussed Six month back) 
Now to post the full details could be viewed as outing someone & as I don't know if the guy is a ex punter & a pimp or a punter & stalker

[NigelF]

Nigel F are you trying to mask your fraud report writing by calling someone else out?

 

It’s been a while since I posted any review of any kind regardless of outcome so the reason you decided to call me out doesn’t make any sense. Personally I have had suspicion you are a bit of a fantasist and make stuff up based on other people’s reviews, you rarely see new girls and your descriptions seem copied from other people’s reviews, basically, I don’t think you are real!!!

You are somewhat right about having a fairly low number of TOFFTs although many others are the same boat and of course I like to use this site to plan my punts (as that's the point of it). Although really, I do have quite a few. I'm literally about to post one now and that definitely does not cover me in glory, as it's poor decision making on my part from the start and I end up paying £100 for a 30 min shit punt.
 

Unfortunately for you thinking that about me, I was in and about parlours that much that loads of people off here have met me and even seen me before or after getting my end away.

 

In the past I would rarely write up a neutral report and full blown negatives are quite rare, If I have had issues with any of the girls in parlours I would have also said something in the place at the time so the parlour would have had direct feedback too. 

 

You even prove a point, my descriptions are accurate and you chose to call me out incorrectly as you only disagree with one report of mine??? Again you’re not making sense. It doesn’t make sense that you decided to pick me out in the first place.

 

However

 

A) What I chose to write about has got nothing to do with you and

 

B) I don’t even know why I am explaining myself for you

 

Basically here’s what I think, you’re a fantasist that’s trying to cover his own back and picked the wrong poster because of lack of knowledge.

                                                                             

However if my suspicions are wrong and you are actually real without an attitude and with good hygiene like you say.  I still feel sorry for the girls who see you because if you waffle on in the room to the girls in person like you post on here in that boring dreary manner it’s no wonder you’re getting a worse experience than some people. You sound really, really boring.

 

Trot on anyway cos I don’t care if you’re not real or what you have to say, and if you want to ignore my reports that’s great!

 

xxx

I chose you because not only do you have an extremely high proportion of positives, you also have a high total number of reviews (basically you post a hell of a lot of positives and hardly any neutrals or negatives).

It's bizarre you think I'm a fantasist. It's a fucking weird fantasy to post reviews of escorts on the internet. The only reason I do it is to help others make more informed decisions and save some cash.

What you choose to write doesn't have anything to with me but you do seem to struggle with the concept of a forum.

You are somewhat right about having a fairly low number of TOFTTs (although many others are in the same boat and the vast majority have less than me) as I like to use this site to plan my punts, which is the whole point of it. Although really, I do have quite a few, don't make me count them! I'm actually about to post one now which is hardly fantasy as I definitely don't cover myself in glory as it's poor decision-making on my part from the start and basically I pay £100 for a pretty shit 30 min punt.

[Tango]

I chose you because not only do you have an extremely high proportion of positives, you also have a high total number of reviews (basically you post a hell of a lot of positives and hardly any neutrals or negatives).

It's bizarre you think I'm a fantasist. It's a fucking weird fantasy to post reviews of escorts on the internet. The only reason I do it is to help others make more informed decisions and save some cash.

What you choose to write doesn't have anything to with me but you do seem to struggle with the concept of a forum.

I have probably been in more wg's than you have hot dinners (i have not seen your waist line and more than likely no one else on here has either because we don't even know if you are real) and just so i am clear you do come across a little weird to be honest. Xxx

[NigelF]

I have probably been in more wg's than you have hot dinners (i have not seen your waist line and more than likely no one else on here has either because we don't even know if you are real) and just so i am clear you do come across a little weird to be honest. Xxx

Big deal, I thought this wasn't a dick measuring contest? Besides you have no idea how many girls I've been in.

Just FYI, I did also edit my last post to include a bit about your point regarding 1st reviews.

[Tango]

Big deal, I thought this wasn't a dick measuring contest? Besides you have no idea how many girls I've been in.

Just FYI, I did also edit my last post to include a bit about your point regarding 1st reviews.

Seeing minimal almost no new girls and leeching so you don't get a shit punt without ever taking one for the team is in my opinion poor form but i keep it to myself normally as what other people do is none of my business and remember you started this one.

You wanted to measure dicks so don't get upset that mine is bigger.

However i don't think you are real. Xxx

[NigelF]

Seeing minimal almost no new girls and leeching so you don't get a shit punt without ever taking one for the team is in my opinion poor form but i keep it to myself normally as what other people do is none of my business and remember you started this one.

You wanted to measure dicks so don't get upset that mine is bigger.

However i don't think you are real. Xxx

You were the one who randomly brought up a "dick measuring contest" - I said it had nothing to with that. Although given your obsession with it, perhaps your insecurities are showing a bit.

Since your point about new girls has intrigued me, I've tried to find out myself. Ignoring "no shows" but including reviews that may have had previous comments on here (but definitely not previous reviews), I have about 26 TOFTT/new girl reviews.

At parlours these include: Jessica, Sophie, Tyler, Chloe, Lola, Skye and Dominique (good to see her getting some recent good reviews but I was first) all at KSG. Mya, Isha and Carly at Ladybirds. Zoe and Camilla at Cosmo. Molly, Daisy, Kimberley and Louise at Sheridan's. Savannah and Erica at GFE Bury and Alex at La Maison.

The independents include: Laura Uk1, Rubina no.1 x, Taylor xx xx, xxCurvyxx Monikaa, "Aromatherapy-massage", HOT COLOMBIAN PUSSY and an upcoming negative for EnglishCleo. Naturally when you're spending more on independents, you tend to do more research beforehand (and of course it is easier to do than with parlour girls).

Now of course, particularly with the parlour girls, some may have had different names elsewhere (but they weren't mentioned on here) and of course comments (but not reviews) as well (many of which aren't particularly revealing or helpful). I know there's been quite a lot of a chat about the Sheridan's girls but for example I was definitely the first to review Daisy and even Kimberley (despite, admittedly I think previous positive comments).

I'll also admit that what I've said above might not be 100% accurate but it's definitely almost there. It will of course depend on how good I was at searching for previous reviews and comments but I think I was pretty thorough.

[Kriss]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[NigelF]

Seeing minimal almost no new girls and leeching so you don't get a shit punt without ever taking one for the team is in my opinion poor form but i keep it to myself normally as what other people do is none of my business and remember you started this one.

You wanted to measure dicks so don't get upset that mine is bigger.

However i don't think you are real. Xxx

I finally posted that TOFTT review I was banging on about. But you're right about me waffling on, indeed that review is no different, in fact it's probably migraine inducing too. Don't worry though, I do have some positives coming up but I tend to prioritise the negatives.

Oh and I think it's fine to criticise to my punting style, this is site designed for such discussion. I think I've proved you wrong in your assertion that I see almost no new girls (see my post above) but you are right about new reviews being the most valuable nonetheless I also think negatives are more valuable than positives (as many others on this site will agree - see topics on similar subjects). Still, I never claimed to be an amazing reviewer.

[Tango]

I finally posted that TOFTT review I was banging on about. But you're right about me waffling on, indeed that review is no different, in fact it's probably migraine inducing too. Don't worry though, I do have some positives coming up but I tend to prioritise the negatives.

Oh and I think it's fine to criticise to my punting style, this is site designed for such discussion. I think I've proved you wrong in your assertion that I see almost no new girls (see my post above) but you are right about new reviews being the most valuable nonetheless I also think negatives are more valuable than positives (as many others on this site will agree - see topics on similar subjects). Still, I never claimed to be an amazing reviewer.

You are waffling again, get a grip. You are missing the point however, I'm not criticising your punting style at all, I wouldn't do that as its not my place.

I do not think you are real. xxx

[Tango]

I see you have posted some more "War and Peace" boring and fictional.

I do not think you are real. xxx