How far back can I post Reviews?

[PaintingMan]

Having just had the bottle to join up  I'd like to post some reviews  however what do people think is a sensible amount of time to go back?

I assume my review of Big Brenda in Bournemouth from 1996 is too old but is a 6 month old review still seen as out of date?

I spend 80% of my time travelling the country and there's plenty to tell from my lonely nights away

[unclepokey]

I don't really have an authorised answer. I for one would think that 6 months is about the absolute limit. But please check that the woman in question is actually still working!

UP

[Knny]

If you can post a link to the girl, then definitely review.  State when approx you saw her.  This would still help.

[cueball]

I'd say if she's active and you can provide a link to her then you're good to go with the review.

[smiths]

Having just had the bottle to join up  I'd like to post some reviews  however what do people think is a sensible amount of time to go back?

I assume my review of Big Brenda in Bournemouth from 1996 is too old but is a 6 month old review still seen as out of date?

I spend 80% of my time travelling the country and there's plenty to tell from my lonely nights away

There isn't a set limit and admin once posted its up to reviewers to decide for themselves but use common sense. So if you have any my advice is IF the WG is still working post a review up with a link to her profile/site and mention in your review it was however long ago it was when you last punted with her.

Obviously reviews of more recent punts are more useful to some of us. And on here you don't have to give the date and time you saw the WG.

[threechilliman]

There isn't a set limit and admin once posted its up to reviewers to decide for themselves but use common sense. So if you have any my advice is IF the WG is still working post a review up with a link to her profile/site and mention in your review it was however long ago it was when you last punted with her.

Obviously reviews of more recent punts are more useful to some of us. And on here you don't have to give the date and time you saw the WG.

^^ This.

tcm

[Blackpool Rock]

Think the above comments hit the nail and the only thing i'd add is that it's probably more important to review the girl if she is a negative to warn other punters of bad service etc.

[mr small]

I would say +ve and -ve are equally important, would think additional info for any wg's with little or no info on this site would be more important

  

[pking_paul]

I would say +ve and -ve are equally important, would think additional info for any wg's with little or no info on this site would be more important

 

What he said! I also asked this question some time back and the general consensus was to make it clear if it was an old review. Also rule of thumb in those responses as best I can recall - was that anything over a year old wasn't really worth it unless these was something important to say as a newbie.

[Nagilum]

I'd say if she's active and you can provide a link to her then you're good to go with the review.

This ^^

[PussyLover789]

I saw a girl just before christmas 2015, and ive only been on this site since May 2016 so im not sure if i should bother now 

[mr small]

If it adds to the information about her put it up, as others have said make it clear it was last year.

To my mind the site is about sharing as much info as we can to help with our chosen hobby to get the best for our ££££

Info about a 3 year old punt is still better than no information at all on a wg

Hopefully flip side is that wg will try harder to keep us happy   

[MilesPrower]

I'd personally like some 1976 punts.

-------------
POSITIVE: Susan
Location: Prefab City Centre
Price: 2 and 6

I entered her house, she had ceramic ducks and purple wall paper as decor. Jimi Hendrix was playing in the background.

Susan dropped her robe, she had a mighty bush, bitch must think it's still 1972. I tried to fuck her but I took a bad trip so her face melted and her bush grew teeth and attacked me. Good comms though.

Peace out
-------------

[hantshagger]

....I for one would think that 6 months is about the absolute limit. But please check that the woman in question is actually still working!

UP

Yikes!  I had better get my finger out and do those reviews I've been planning!

I was thinking i might share a review of a WG i saw, when celebrating the close of WW2 in 1945, shame..... I might have to leave that one out then.   

Good point about the girl still working though!   

[Steely Dan]

Just to close the loop, the guidelines, as well as the link to Admin's comments, are in point 17 on the guide to writing a review.   Just adding the link here to make searching easier.

External Link/Members Only

And to the OP, since you didn't notice point 17, I assume you didn't notice the other 16.  Suggest you glance at them.  Few punters read them and it is not required - just might prevent an attack for breaking some other tiny point.  We are capable of attacking new posters on this board at times....

[Blackpool Rock]

Few punters read them and it is not required - just might prevent an attack for breaking some other tiny point.  We are capable of attacking new posters on this board at times....

Can't say i've noticed   

[Boringbob]

I'd personally like some 1976 punts.

-------------
She was dressed in classic teacher gear. Heals, stockings, horn rimmed glasses.
I pressed her over the desk and lifted her hem and buried my face in her snatch.

She scolded me harshly.  "Robert, go to the headmaster at once! I will not accept this behaviour!"
I burst in to tears.  Being 8 really sucks sometimes.

Would recommend tho if you are a bit bigger and not scared of a bit of shouting.
-------------

[MilesPrower]