Doing UKP reviews

[Midlane]

I haven't been here anything like as long as some but I frequently read comments like "yes I've seen her, she was... etc"

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Reckon its a question of motivation - either very good or very bad. Since I joined I've done 4 reviews, 3 very good and 1 today, spectacularly bad....

[willbred]

Reckon its a question of motivation - either very good or very bad. Since I joined I've done 4 reviews, 3 very good and 1 today, spectacularly bad....

Just read the "spectacularly bad" review. I veered between sympathy, empathy and laughter at your laconic style. Sounds like another epsiode down to "dick brain"? What a fucking 'mare. Least you'd had a great ride up 'til then, though, mate

 

[Jimmyredcab]

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

I would not do a negative review of a girl who has visited my house, far too risky. 

[vw]

I haven't been here anything like as long as some but I frequently read comments like "yes I've seen her, she was... etc"

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

All up to the review writer in the end, some i skip over as outcall only part time girls and less motivated to do these as 95% punts are incalls and feel some are wasted.

What ever I feel like a negative always jumps the review queue and gets put up to protect other punters from the same fate.

All about priorities !

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Just read the "spectacularly bad" review. I veered between sympathy, empathy and laughter at your laconic style. Sounds like another epsiode down to "dick brain"? What a fucking 'mare. Least you'd had a great ride up 'til then, though, mate

 

willbred dick brain is spot on, should've had a wank.

[RedKettle]

In my early days on here I slipped up and gave a girl enough information to work out who I was on here, and unusually for me she also knew my AW name - I normally just call so they do not.  I was also not then using a punting phone  A review would have been neutral and I decided it was too big a risk given all the dots she might be able to join up.

Now I review without fear given all the security stuff I learnt on here.  I never let slip I am in here, I have a punting phone and other than RBs I tend to avoid comms via AW.

[Malvolio]

I've yet to put up a second review of WGs I've revisited - and would only do so if things had materially changed.  Other than that, nothing would put me off doing a review.

[Jimmyredcab]

I've yet to put up a second review of WGs I've revisited - and would only do so if things had materially changed. 

Nothing wrong with a second review, especially if a few months have elapsed.   

[smiths]

I haven't been here anything like as long as some but I frequently read comments like "yes I've seen her, she was... etc"

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

I don't view a WG who already has 10+ reviews as one not to review myself as the review would be that punters experience of the punt, but as ever that's up to the punter to decide.

I sometimes didn't review a gem for a while so I had my fill first, the gem might of been recommended to me by a punter who asked me not to post about the WG on the open forum. I would always post up a negative review.

[Sonny Crockett]

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

If the girl was neither brilliant, nor awful in a meet I had with her. She was just OK, but not special. She would be not worth mentioning on a forum.

[claretandblue]

I would always review a shit punt to warn other punters, I try and review most other punts, particularly if I don't plan on seeing them again, the only time I might hold back on reviewing is if I plan on seeing a girl multiple times,would hold off until I have had my fill 

[Nagilum]

I haven't been here anything like as long as some but I frequently read comments like "yes I've seen her, she was... etc"

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

I review all girls I see, to warn punters or confirm the service is up to scratch.

I only do one review per girl as a rule.

The punter comes first and no girl can be reviewed enough IMHO.

[Blackpool Rock]

As others have said a negative really needs to be done fairly soon just to warn other UKP members especially if a punter has been robbed / conned / threatened.
I've not done a second review of a girl yet as it wouldn't add anything new and at what point does it start to become fluffy / touting? A change in service level etc from the girl would warrant a second review if she went downhill.
The other issue is finding time to review and a neutral probably wouldn't get reviewed unless a lot of guys were posting about whether anybody had seen her.
I did do a positive review on a girl a couple of weeks ago but only after i'd seen her a few times, don't see why the best girls should get podged early doors by the lurkers who just cherry pick the good ones without punting the shit, I did however PM the girls details to half a dozen guys who actively review to give them the heads up 1st

[Third Man]

as per NIKs rules of punting no 15, about negative reviews I must admit I have usually tried to block them from my mind and not posted, but I would say that I would never not do it if its a scam , bait and switch etc, but fortunately Ive not had that for many a year apart from a timewaster last summer that I did do a negative. I have responded to questions though about girls I didnt rate for info purposes. Re posting positives, yes Ive done it and then found i can hardly get a booking so now that makes me wary.

[Nagilum]

Re posting positives, yes Ive done it and then found i can hardly get a booking so now that makes me wary.

Explain? 

[uutarn]

I just wondered, apart from cases where there are already 10+ UKP reviews on a particular girl, under what circumstances would you NOT put up a review of a punt ?

For me no.
I would always review a girl i see for the first time no matter what the meet was like and no matter how many reviews she already has. I would do a re-review of a girl i'd seen before if the meet was special in some way.
Unlike others i have no desire to keep "gems" for myself as that behavior is contrary to the way i was brought up. And besides, i've always been able to see the girl after a good review and even if i couldn't see her, there's plenty more pussy to plunder.

[oring123]

Any reviews on ukp are of value
 as its does not improve your score such as aw
Normally if say 3 review of a girl are posted here
 you can get a feeling of if they are for you
When aw  10 reviews can be totaly missleading
due to fluffy punters .white knights ..and pimps / sergi
False reporting ,