Author Topic: Nicky Devine - Harrow  (Read 3345 times)


5 review(s) for Nicky.Divine.xxx (4 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline masalacock

I visited Nicky earlier this week and came out with mixed feelings about the experience. This was my first London punt and review so I will try and keep it meaningful.
Details:
External Link/Members Only
Location- 200 meters from Harrow on the hill underground. Very convenient.
Comms: prompt responses to calls and texts
Appearance: toned figure, those enchanting fuck-me-now eyes, let down by saggy and disproportionate tits
Service- this is where the review borderlines towards negative. I felt Nicky was not into at all, the sex and BJ was very mechanical, not deep and very toothy. very light FK (as if fulfilling a formality). I was aroused and eventually CIM only because of the sight of her great looking toned body and arse. The overall experience was poor with Nicky's indifference towards it making it less than worthwhile. 

Damages of £90/hour, sound vfm but in hindsight I would rather spend 20-50 and opt for a lot more fulfilling experience with an engaging WG.
 

Offline pumps

First post and first review! but it sounds like a believable account of events to me, so thanks for the review.

I'm sure her fan club will be all over this review soon!

johnnyboy61

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just thought I say hi Pumps so not to disappoint you! ;)

Offline claretandblue

Masalacock :scare:

That's got to be the worst username on here!

LL

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've not seen her for over a year.  Toned figure you say?  So the ginormous arse is gone?

a10

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Gotta ask though, for £90 an hour, what were you expecting?

Offline MP778

seen her much more recently than a year ago and definitely she was not toned so unless she toned up quite a bit in the last couple months...

her ass is pretty big (but very nice imho)

Offline pumps

Just thought I say hi Pumps so not to disappoint you! ;)

Hi  :hi:

I've not seen her for over a year.  Toned figure you say?  So the ginormous arse is gone?

Maybe the OP weights 24 stone and to him she is toned? 

mastershifu

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I visited Nicky earlier this week and came out with mixed feelings about the experience. This was my first London punt and review so I will try and keep it meaningful.
Details:
External Link/Members Only
Location- 200 meters from Harrow on the hill underground. Very convenient.
Comms: prompt responses to calls and texts
Appearance: toned figure, those enchanting fuck-me-now eyes, let down by saggy and disproportionate tits
Service- this is where the review borderlines towards negative. I felt Nicky was not into at all, the sex and BJ was very mechanical, not deep and very toothy. very light FK (as if fulfilling a formality). I was aroused and eventually CIM only because of the sight of her great looking toned body and arse. The overall experience was poor with Nicky's indifference towards it making it less than worthwhile. 

Damages of £90/hour, sound vfm but in hindsight I would rather spend 20-50 and opt for a lot more fulfilling experience with an engaging WG.


What would you say the dress size is? another review posted just yesterday indicates figure isn't quite the same as in this post
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=53925.0

johnnyboy61

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm sure her fan club will be all over this review soon!

OK, after my initial greeting it won't surprise Pumps (as he knows that I am a fully paid up member of her "fan club") that I can't resist putting in my two pennies' worth!


That may be true in some cases, but Nicky has already built up her client/fluffy base, so she can afford to be a temp wg as she knows she'll get her usual flow of long term customers.

She has had quite a few profile changes which have been listed by other reviewers: Elegant Chanel, Divine Paris, Nicole Spring, Nicole Vanilla Sky and Nicky Divine.

Two things to note:

Her combined ratings from her reviews under her various names/profiles are 11 Positives and 2 Neutrals.  Her two Neutrals are her most recent reviews (including this one) written by punters for whom she is a newbie.  As you say, maybe she knows that she has returning custom and is now going through the motions with new customers.  She has been over here for a few years and is planning to retire after the summer and is possibly suffering from burnout with the end in sight and, whether consciously or not, is starting to wind-down.

Nearly every review and comment mentions that her bottom half in particular is larger than you might expect from the cleverly angled photos, although opinions vary as to how much of a negative factor this is.  I know it might surprise some, but I think that she is quite into fitness, and although she certainly does carry more weight than is desirable for many (and not enough for the BBW lovers) she is still quite firm and has a trim tummy (but, judgments vary, and this is just mine).  There seems to be almost as many opinions about her breasts as there are people commenting on them, including some very conflicting descriptions.

So she definitely divides the commentators, and as I have said on another thread, I hope that generally we can trust UKP reviewers to give honest reviews, but we have to understand that they can do so from their perspective.  A Positive review from one member cannot guarantee the same for other punters, especially it seems in this case where Nicky's service does seem to have started to tail-off, but it doesn't mean that the review was excessively "fluffy" or dishonest.  Some WGs also vary their service over time, and although I didn't know her in the Southfields days, it seems that she was prepared to offer a wider range of services when she moved to Harrow to become independent. 

From my personal experience she is still giving a great service to her returning clients (or to use Pumps' more negative alternative - her "fluffies") and I have never experienced anything vaguely mechanical, but obviously from her recent reviews one should treat with caution if you are thinking of visiting her for the first time.


LL

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I never wrote a review for her after my visit. I would agree with the above. I.e. great service and overall it was a positive experience. However her shape (size 10 top half, size 14 bottom half) isn't for me so I haven't been back.  When I asked the question about her current size I was genuinely interested as if she had lost some of the junk from her trunk I'd be back to see her in a shot.

johnnyboy61

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I never wrote a review for her after my visit. I would agree with the above. I.e. great service and overall it was a positive experience. However her shape (size 10 top half, size 14 bottom half) isn't for me so I haven't been back.  When I asked the question about her current size I was genuinely interested as if she had lost some of the junk from her trunk I'd be back to see her in a shot.
I first saw her about a year ago and would say that her shape hasn't really changed in that time, so if she wasn't for you then there's no reason to return.  For me her service overrides the negatives about her body, but I can quite understand that if you are not getting the same level of enthusiastic service then she becomes much harder to recommend.

Offline pumps

OK, after my initial greeting it won't surprise Pumps (as he knows that I am a fully paid up member of her "fan club") that I can't resist putting in my two pennies' worth!

She has had quite a few profile changes which have been listed by other reviewers: Elegant Chanel, Divine Paris, Nicole Spring, Nicole Vanilla Sky and Nicky Divine.

Two things to note:

Her combined ratings from her reviews under her various names/profiles are 11 Positives and 2 Neutrals.  Her two Neutrals are her most recent reviews (including this one) written by punters for whom she is a newbie.  As you say, maybe she knows that she has returning custom and is now going through the motions with new customers.  She has been over here for a few years and is planning to retire after the summer and is possibly suffering from burnout with the end in sight and, whether consciously or not, is starting to wind-down.

Nearly every review and comment mentions that her bottom half in particular is larger than you might expect from the cleverly angled photos, although opinions vary as to how much of a negative factor this is.  I know it might surprise some, but I think that she is quite into fitness, and although she certainly does carry more weight than is desirable for many (and not enough for the BBW lovers) she is still quite firm and has a trim tummy (but, judgments vary, and this is just mine).  There seems to be almost as many opinions about her breasts as there are people commenting on them, including some very conflicting descriptions.

So she definitely divides the commentators, and as I have said on another thread, I hope that generally we can trust UKP reviewers to give honest reviews, but we have to understand that they can do so from their perspective.  A Positive review from one member cannot guarantee the same for other punters, especially it seems in this case where Nicky's service does seem to have started to tail-off, but it doesn't mean that the review was excessively "fluffy" or dishonest.  Some WGs also vary their service over time, and although I didn't know her in the Southfields days, it seems that she was prepared to offer a wider range of services when she moved to Harrow to become independent. 

From my personal experience she is still giving a great service to her returning clients (or to use Pumps' more negative alternative - her "fluffies") and I have never experienced anything vaguely mechanical, but obviously from her recent reviews one should treat with caution if you are thinking of visiting her for the first time.


Her returning clients are not fluffies,  that's solely you at the moment, you feel the need to defend or find justification for every critical thing said about her or her service.

Of course thats entirely up to you however you stsrt to lose credibility in what you say about wg's or this wg thereafter on the forum; when your seen to be a self appointed white knight.

Your not the first punter to disagree with what's been said in a review and you won't be the last

Offline DH

I've seen her 3 times last year the first time I've seen her was unbelievable good enthusiastic energetic sweaty sex and all that she holds the record on how many times can I come in an hour 5 times! None of the other wg managed( not even the top aw rated Platinum Cindy and the rest) to do that usually it's 2 or 3 in an hour.
2nd time was good but not as good as the first time
My last visit it was more or less as the above review... something was missing which kinda put me off.
I thought maybe she had one of those days  I want to see her again but after the 2 neutrals I'm not so sure anymore.

One thing I haven't done on my 3rd visit was not giving her oral. Could that be the key that unlocks her sex drive? She got quite wet the first 2 visits on oral.

Offline pumps

I've seen her 3 times last year the first time I've seen her was unbelievable good enthusiastic energetic sweaty sex and all that she holds the record on how many times can I come in an hour 5 times! None of the other wg managed( not even the top aw rated Platinum Cindy and the rest) to do that usually it's 2 or 3 in an hour.
2nd time was good but not as good as the first time
My last visit it was more or less as the above review... something was missing which kinda put me off.
I thought maybe she had one of those days  I want to see her again but after the 2 neutrals I'm not so sure anymore.

One thing I haven't done on my 3rd visit was not giving her oral. Could that be the key that unlocks her sex drive? She got quite wet the first 2 visits on oral.

Tis a shame, probably didn't care much about the repeat business as she knew she was retiring

Offline MancSean

Profile seems to have gone. Never appealed to me this wg mainly coz she's ripped someone else's name off which I find lazy and trying to cash in on someone else's rep. For me that's always been a big no.
The white Knighting is also a big put off for me and find that it actually detracts from the girls appeal rather than increasing it
When one of the girls I have seen the most this year got a negative I said nowt because most of the negative points were valid.  Defending a girl with a multitude of excuses for her shit performance is probably the most pathetic posts I see on her. And winding down to "retirement" is no excuse at all neither is giving a shite service coz someone is new.
What makes people white knight or defend a wg from a neutral or negative review? Because unless the white knight was in the room how could he possibly have anything to say about another punters experience I will never know.  If this girl still had a profile I would blacklist her purely down to this thread alone. Mainly coz it sounds like my dad is bigger than yours with all the defending of someone who hasn't delivered the service to meet the punters expectations
« Last Edit: September 17, 2015, 08:52:02 am by MancSean »