Author Topic: Tittilating Teen of London (Read 8397 times)

bobdavid · « **on:** January 29, 2013, 07:59:33 am »

External Link/Members Only

3 hours outcall - London - £300

This girl was another of those where, at first, I was really worried that her photos wouldn't be real ... well, I can tell you, they absolutely are.

Timi, currently working as TittilatingTeen (bear in mind that she changed her name 2 weeks ago from SexyTeenSeductress), is awesome.

At only 19 years old, I was amazed at her conversation.. she has a very sultry voice and, for me at least, very intelligent. When your twice somebody's age, you certainly don't expect them to know more about the world than you, or to have visited more destinations - but Timi beat me hands down...

Going from great conversation, my next false assumption was that she mustn't be great in bed ... in terms of services offered, there's definitely a mixed bag there - no rimming or strapon offered ... yet she offers watersports (giving and receiving) and hardsports (giving) at additional cost ... I wasn't interested in either of these, though, leaving me with "just" the regular sex (I'm not much of an "A" person either).

So, after lots of tongue tangling french kissing and teasing each other by slowly undressing each other, we moved to the bed. There I was in for a shock ... Timi's oral skills were amazing - exactly how I liked with loads of spit, very wet, smooth, taking in my cock and balls easily... wow. I reciprocated with oral on her, including some 69 - we must've been at each other for almost an hour like this..! Then, finally, I could take no more and had to fuck her ... so on with a condom and we alternated between doggy and missionary... when I was closed to cumming, I let her know - and off went the condom for me to finish in her mouth.

Fantastic. I would definitely love to see Timi again the next time I'm in London. Absolutely gorgeous, wonderful time - amazing. Definitely recommended.

mh · « **Reply #1 on:** January 29, 2013, 08:40:16 am »

Quote from: bobdavid on January 29, 2013, 07:59:33 am

External Link/Members Only

3 hours outcall - London - £300

That's a lot less than listed pricing, does she do deals?!

vt · « **Reply #2 on:** January 29, 2013, 05:39:29 pm »

Are you sure she's 19? Judging by the lines on her face, she looks over 30 in that pic!

Perhaps that explains how she is so well-travelled!

bobdavid · « **Reply #3 on:** January 29, 2013, 11:01:47 pm »

She's definitely no more than 21... I actually believe, from meeting her, that she really is 19.

bobdavid · « **Reply #4 on:** January 29, 2013, 11:04:22 pm »

Quote from: mh on January 29, 2013, 08:40:16 am

That's a lot less than listed pricing, does she do deals?!

I listed a reverse booking and she'd bid on it - so, yeah, in a way.. with many girls of course it depends what you want - if I'd said in my reverse booking that I wanted a PSE with 3 hours of anal sex and such, her bid would likely have been at a much higher price ... but since I'd mentioned wine, chatting, massage, kissing, etc, she hopefully would've realised that I wasn't expecting to just non-stop hump.......

vt · « **Reply #5 on:** January 30, 2013, 10:35:05 am »

Quote from: bobdavid on January 29, 2013, 11:01:47 pm

She's definitely no more than 21... I actually believe, from meeting her, that she really is 19.

Have you seen her verification pic, she looks 40+ in that!!!!

Can you explain that?

Is she British?

ali123 · « **Reply #6 on:** January 30, 2013, 10:58:21 am »

What the hell is that verification photo? My god bloody woke me up!!

yumyum3 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 30, 2013, 11:07:06 am »

It is your money but:
£200 an hour

£300 for a blow job and a shag

taffy · « **Reply #8 on:** January 30, 2013, 05:38:23 pm »

Couldn't even fool a blind man with those lines on her face.

Steve2 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 30, 2013, 05:49:21 pm »

Quote from: yumyum3 on January 30, 2013, 11:07:06 am

It is your money but:
£200 an hour
£300 for a blow job and a shag

She bid on a reverse booking YY

So maybe the £200'hr went out of the window along with the dusty phone

bobdavid · « **Reply #10 on:** February 04, 2013, 07:50:53 am »

I can't really force anyone to believe me - she's really nice, she "might" be a year or two over 19 (though personally I believe her) and I guess the point is that I thought my time was well spent.

Plus, about cost, I do the "cheaper" punts when I'm back home ... £50 half hours. Those are fine - but when I'm in London I like to have a more relaxed, intimate time ... it's something that I don't get much of from my wife so, yeah, I'll pay for that.

Jimmyredcab · « **Reply #11 on:** February 04, 2013, 02:17:39 pm »

Quote from: bobdavid on February 04, 2013, 07:50:53 am

I can't really force anyone to believe me - she's really nice.

Oh Dear.

vt · « **Reply #12 on:** February 04, 2013, 11:05:05 pm »

Quote from: bobdavid on February 04, 2013, 07:50:53 am

I can't really force anyone to believe me - she's really nice, she "might" be a year or two over 19 (though personally I believe her) and I guess the point is that I thought my time was well spent.

Plus, about cost, I do the "cheaper" punts when I'm back home ... £50 half hours. Those are fine - but when I'm in London I like to have a more relaxed, intimate time ... it's something that I don't get much of from my wife so, yeah, I'll pay for that.

So why has she now changed her name to Seductive LittleTeen , removed her gallery and hidden her verification photo??

If she really is 19, that must have been her mum in that pic!

Jimmyredcab · « **Reply #13 on:** February 04, 2013, 11:35:58 pm »

Quote from: vt on February 04, 2013, 11:05:05 pm

So why has she now changed her name to Seductive LittleTeen , removed her gallery and hidden her verification photo??

Yeah but, no but, yeah but ------------------- she's really nice.

bobdavid · « **Reply #14 on:** February 06, 2013, 09:02:21 am »

Quote from: vt on February 04, 2013, 11:05:05 pm

So why has she now changed her name to Seductive LittleTeen , removed her gallery and hidden her verification photo??

If she really is 19, that must have been her mum in that pic!

So changing her name, removing gallery pics etc shows that she's over 19?

seriously..? I think it's much more likely that she got worried that somebody would recognise her... and her name change shows that she's just trying to find her feet, nothing more.

I've met her and I will attest that she definitely is 19-20 years old. And seriously, this website needs a picture of somebody banging their head on a desk much more violently that the wall-banging GIF - because I'm seriously doing this right now with frustration at how stupid you guys are.

yumyum3 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 06, 2013, 10:15:48 am »

Quote

because I'm seriously doing this right now with frustration at how stupid you guys are.

£300 to have sex with someone doesn't sound particularly intelligent to me bob, sorry.

bobdavid · « **Reply #16 on:** February 06, 2013, 02:30:39 pm »

Quote from: yumyum3 on February 06, 2013, 10:15:48 am

£300 to have sex with someone doesn't sound particularly intelligent to me bob, sorry.

How can a figure of expenditure be attributed to intelligence?

Look at it this way ... take 2 people:-

Person 1: his take home pay is £1,000 per month and he spends £50-60 per escort session.

Person 2: his take home pay is £10,000 per month and he spends £300-400 per escort session..

If Person 1 sees 3 girls per month then he's spending 15-18% of his pay.

If Person 2 sees 3 girls per month, he's spending 9-12%.

That's based on TAKE HOME PAY. It doesn't take a genius to figure that these examples become even more greatly skewed if you consider EXPENDABLE INCOME instead of take home.

Now, tell me, who is lacking a little in the brain cells here..?

Would you expect Bill Gates to see a £50 escort? Tony Blair? Duncan Bannatyne? Would they be lacking in intelligence if they spent more money on a girl..?

So, before you know the facts, it's probably best not to bring intelligence into this. If you can't comfortably afford to spend £300 on a punt, that's fine - many people can't. But anyone who tries to insult the intelligence of somebody that can needs to resolve their own issues first...

Jimmyredcab · « **Reply #17 on:** February 06, 2013, 02:41:45 pm »

Quote from: bobdavid on February 06, 2013, 02:30:39 pm

How can a figure of expenditure be attributed to intelligence?

Look at it this way ... take 2 people:-

Person 1: his take home pay is £1,000 per month and he spends £50-60 per escort session.

Person 2: his take home pay is £10,000 per month and he spends £300-400 per escort session..

If Person 1 sees 3 girls per month then he's spending 15-18% of his pay.

If Person 2 sees 3 girls per month, he's spending 9-12%.

I am not sure who you are trying to convince, possibly yourself.

£200 an hour prostitutes are generally rip off chancers, the income of the punter is totally irrelevant.

skittish · « **Reply #18 on:** February 06, 2013, 04:23:34 pm »

In my unintelligent mind, I think for me higher disposable income would = more punts, not more expensive ones.

I wouldn't pay more just for the bragging rights.

yumyum3 · « **Reply #19 on:** February 06, 2013, 05:49:06 pm »

Quote

Quote from: yumyum3 on Today at 10:15:48 am

£300 to have sex with someone doesn't sound particularly intelligent to me bob, sorry.

How can a figure of expenditure be attributed to intelligence?

Look at it this way ... take 2 people:-

Person 1: his take home pay is £1,000 per month and he spends £50-60 per escort session.

Person 2: his take home pay is £10,000 per month and he spends £300-400 per escort session..

If Person 1 sees 3 girls per month then he's spending 15-18% of his pay.

If Person 2 sees 3 girls per month, he's spending 9-12%.

That's based on TAKE HOME PAY. It doesn't take a genius to figure that these examples become even more greatly skewed if you consider EXPENDABLE INCOME instead of take home.

Now, tell me, who is lacking a little in the brain cells here..?

Would you expect Bill Gates to see a £50 escort? Tony Blair? Duncan Bannatyne? Would they be lacking in intelligence if they spent more money on a girl..?

So, before you know the facts, it's probably best not to bring intelligence into this. If you can't comfortably afford to spend £300 on a punt, that's fine - many people can't. But anyone who tries to insult the intelligence of somebody that can needs to resolve their own issues first...

You sound really angry about this and it is blinding you. If you look at your own post from earlier it was you who called everybody stupid:

Quote

I'm seriously doing this right now with frustration at how stupid you guys are

I just responded by politely pointing that I don't think paying £300 for sex is a particularly intelligent thing to do. Having said that, as I pointed out in my first post it is your money and your choice what you do with it, not mine. You've now responded by almost frothing at the mouth and trying to rationalise your choices through a "spreadsheet" argument. You don't have to rationalise anything to me its up to you what you spend your money on but I think Jimmy's suggestion that you're trying to convince yourself is pretty accurate.

andrei · « **Reply #20 on:** February 06, 2013, 10:34:59 pm »

Quote from: bobdavid on February 06, 2013, 09:02:21 am

how stupid you guys are.

you know, when people come on here and start referring to the punting community as "you guys" it does make one suspicious

bobdavid · « **Reply #21 on:** February 06, 2013, 11:19:56 pm »

Right... dress the comments up how you like - but when JimmyRedCab posts a response with

the inference there is pretty clear and, frankly, insulting.

Quote from: andrei on February 06, 2013, 10:34:59 pm

you know, when people come on here and start referring to the punting community as "you guys" it does make one suspicious

I didn't mean the whole punting community - just the idiots who responded to my post thinking that inserting stupid head-banging smileys would help them win their arguments. When I see people thinking that they're clever just by inserting a

or a

, well, it just shows that they're

. So to be clear next time, I'll call them "the wackos" instead of "guys".

Jimmyredcab · « **Reply #22 on:** February 07, 2013, 01:19:42 am »

Quote from: bobdavid on February 06, 2013, 11:19:56 pm

Right... dress the comments up how you like - but when JimmyRedCab posts a response with the inference there is pretty clear and, frankly, insulting.

It certainly wasn't my intention to be insulting.

You may or may not know me but I always tell it as I see it.

That has made me many enemies over the years but I wouldn't have it any other way.

Dale · « **Reply #23 on:** February 07, 2013, 06:19:33 am »

I have her in my Hotlist, for when I get to London next. Should be one hot fuck!

andrei · « **Reply #24 on:** February 07, 2013, 11:12:32 am »

ok, i'll add my two pence with regard the profile

200 per hour for a girl who provides just one picture is a definite no-no

add to that the fact that she had a verification pic but chooses not to show it (possibly because it proves she is not the age she says she is) is also a negative

and one of my pet peeves, her profile lists her bum as her best feature yet its not depicted on her profile, so if you wanna check if it is her best feature you have to pay 200 quid as she doesnt have a half hour option

so i'm glad you had an enjoyable time but her profile makes it a no-go for me

bobdavid · « **Reply #25 on:** January 02, 2014, 08:37:45 am »

I just had a look at Timi's profile and... well.. it's now used by a different girl - with Timi's name. Either that or she's changed a LOT since I saw her...

Her review score is still 14 - no new reviews in a long, long time...

So I'd probably discount my review now, just in case anyone comes across this ..............

Mr Farkyhars · « **Reply #26 on:** January 02, 2014, 11:22:04 am »

They will certainly come across it now that you've bumped it to the top, BobD

bobdavid · « **Reply #27 on:** January 02, 2014, 02:25:23 pm »

Quote from: Mr Farkyhars on January 02, 2014, 11:22:04 am

They will certainly come across it now that you've bumped it to the top, BobD

Oh... arse. That's right... maybe the original review could just be deleted..?

Tonyleung · « **Reply #28 on:** January 05, 2014, 01:19:45 am »

Haha, fuck 'em all Bobdavid. At least you enjoyed the punt.

I just looked at the profile pics, and I gotta say those are butt ugly photo's on the profile and shit quality. Nothing personal.

Tonyleung · « **Reply #29 on:** January 05, 2014, 01:21:32 am »

oh yeah and "Timi johnson" sounds to me like a boys name,

cjkanye02 · « **Reply #30 on:** January 05, 2014, 04:44:20 am »

Haha why did he get a hard time for spending £300 on a 3 hour outcall? That's a pretty good rate!

Johny Stone · « **Reply #31 on:** August 19, 2015, 07:37:17 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She is still 200 ph, just popped up in Bristol.
What`s interesting is that she is 22 now

She was 19 in 2013, 2 years ago

PLeisure · « **Reply #32 on:** August 19, 2015, 07:58:15 pm »

Quote from: Having Fun on August 19, 2015, 07:37:17 pm

What`s interesting is that she is 22 now
She was 19 in 2013, 2 years ago

Perfectly possible depending on which month her b'day falls and when you viewed her profile

Author Topic: Tittilating Teen of London (Read 8397 times)

vt

vt

ali123

yumyum3

taffy

vt

yumyum3

yumyum3

andrei

andrei

cjkanye02

Member Benefits