Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Katie36xxx Deepest darkest Norfolk  (Read 1508 times)

Neal69

  • Guest
A Few weeks ago.

Opportunity arose and her green light was on.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

No Phone Number due to No Mobile signal in the Village but good comms via AW e mail.

Given address on the day of the punt and it is a bit remote.

Many reasons why this should be anything other than a positive but as usual I score these reviews on how I felt walking away and it was Positive.

Public only pics looked good. Services as advertised looked good too.

Got to Village and was met by an average looking WG who is definitely a bit larger than her pics depict.

More a girl next door than a stunner but not a munter.

Shown to a decent bedroom in a nice house and got straight into kissing ( not DFK but FK)

Wearing a Gown type thing over a bikini type underwear.

Taking off the Gown revealed the underwear which was soon taken off . Straight into the action , no messing around.

Snogging was good but not deep, taking off the  knickers revealed a shaven pussy which was begging to be played with.

RO produced the requisite responses but by heck did it get wet so maybe it was having the desired effect.

Quite a lot of suggestive chat such as when she was rubbing her pussy and I was having a pull of the old boy she said something like "I love watching that"

Unlike me I took the lead and said It would look good in your mouth and OWO was performed with gusto.

As Pressure was building I suggested shagging and was dressed up for it and said I would like doggy.

Like I said earlier she is bigger than her pics suggest but the rear view was great with very soft alabaster skin and the view from behind was awesome.

Did her doggy and blew into the bag.

The rest of the hour was spent messing with woman bits and chat.

So In summary.

Not as good looking as the pics suggest.

Bigger than the pics suggest.

Does watch the time. Although I was advised of this before hand.

 FK RO OWO and Fucking performed with willingness.

Got surprisingly wet.

Surprisingly nice pussy for a woman with 2 children.

Overall I enjoyed the meet.

£120 for one hour is a bit on the expensive side for what is otherwise available.

Return?

Probably Yes as I did enjoy the overall experience.

N

Offline Canaryboy

Every time I email her to make a booking she never replies!!!!

Offline happyharry

Every time I email her to make a booking she never replies!!!!

+1

Sent her polite e.mail requests but zilch (and I do have good AW feedback so it can't be that).

Mind, having read the review, she is now off my HL

Offline Mr Garmin

About 10 years ago (could even be more) I met a girl near St Neots who used those photos and IIRC was called Katie something. She was quite a bit bigger than her pics suggested which put me off a bit as I tend to like them slim, but not skinny. She was quite friendly and did talk a lot before the action began - I had to move it on as it was on the clock.

One thing I do remember was receiving a text that said 'I'm watching porn and getting horny' while I was driving to her place - that did put me in the mood.

She got me out pretty sharpish as the baby sitter was returning with the kid(s)

More of a neutral for me.

Offline Canaryboy

A Few weeks ago.

Opportunity arose and her green light was on.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

No Phone Number due to No Mobile signal in the Village but good comms via AW e mail.

Given address on the day of the punt and it is a bit remote.

Many reasons why this should be anything other than a positive but as usual I score these reviews on how I felt walking away and it was Positive.

Public only pics looked good. Services as advertised looked good too.

Got to Village and was met by an average looking WG who is definitely a bit larger than her pics depict.

More a girl next door than a stunner but not a munter.

Shown to a decent bedroom in a nice house and got straight into kissing ( not DFK but FK)

Wearing a Gown type thing over a bikini type underwear.

Taking off the Gown revealed the underwear which was soon taken off . Straight into the action , no messing around.

Snogging was good but not deep, taking off the  knickers revealed a shaven pussy which was begging to be played with.

RO produced the requisite responses but by heck did it get wet so maybe it was having the desired effect.

Quite a lot of suggestive chat such as when she was rubbing her pussy and I was having a pull of the old boy she said something like "I love watching that"

Unlike me I took the lead and said It would look good in your mouth and OWO was performed with gusto.

As Pressure was building I suggested shagging and was dressed up for it and said I would like doggy.

Like I said earlier she is bigger than her pics suggest but the rear view was great with very soft alabaster skin and the view from behind was awesome.

Did her doggy and blew into the bag.

The rest of the hour was spent messing with woman bits and chat.

So In summary.

Not as good looking as the pics suggest.

Bigger than the pics suggest.

Does watch the time. Although I was advised of this before hand.

 FK RO OWO and Fucking performed with willingness.

Got surprisingly wet.

Surprisingly nice pussy for a woman with 2 children.

Overall I enjoyed the meet.

£120 for one hour is a bit on the expensive side for what is otherwise available.

Return?

Probably Yes as I did enjoy the overall experience.

N
What sort of email did you send her to reply back?

vt

  • Guest
About 10 years ago (could even be more) I met a girl near St Neots who used those photos and IIRC was called Katie something. She was quite a bit bigger than her pics suggested which put me off a bit as I tend to like them slim, but not skinny. She was quite friendly and did talk a lot before the action began - I had to move it on as it was on the clock.

One thing I do remember was receiving a text that said 'I'm watching porn and getting horny' while I was driving to her place - that did put me in the mood.

She got me out pretty sharpish as the baby sitter was returning with the kid(s)

More of a neutral for me.

So the pics are at least 10 yrs old...no wonder the OP didn't think she looked like them!!  :thumbsdown:

Neal69

  • Guest
Canary boy,

If I understand your question correctly We used the AW Email system for all correspondence.

N

Offline Canaryboy

Neal69

every time I have tried talking through email on aw about a booking she either ignore or delete!!! Maybe I'm saying something wrong that she don't like
« Last Edit: March 05, 2016, 09:37:28 am by Canaryboy »

Neal69

  • Guest
Oh I see what you are asking now.

It was nothing unusual just a straight forward enquiry about a booking and available times.

Rough location given first then an actual address on the day.

Not very helpful I know but that's all there was to it.

N