Bad Communication = Good Service

[Clarence Boddicker]

I've been making my way through what I feel are UKP Londons blue chip providers and something I've noticed is there's often a correlation between bad comms and good service, I'm not sure why, perhaps it's being less professional makes them more adventurous or maybe scatty girls are more spontaneous.  Is this ayoe else has found? 

[Mr Garmin]

I can believe that, as a big generalisation, this could be the case with some girls

crazy in the head = crazy in bed = disorganised chaotic lifestyle

[alabama1]

I've been making my way through what I feel are UKP Londons blue chip providers and something I've noticed is there's often a correlation between bad comms and good service, I'm not sure why, perhaps it's being less professional makes them more adventurous or maybe scatty girls are more spontaneous.  Is this ayoe else has found?

Actually this reminds me of a now retired Polish hottie that was a forum darling on here, amongst other places.

[hendrix]

For me, it's the opposite, generally speaking. MissKDD being the gold standard for the comms/service combo. I guess Lola Wild would be a good example of atrocious comms/excellent service though 😂

[alabama1]

Just thought of another Pole who used to reside in Brum, 'Sweet Pola'. Notoriously difficult to arrange a meet , but offered the best ever GFE .

[Heph]

Like him or not, Trump was right on the matter of 'the crazy ones are better in bed'
Speaking for myself, I can think of half a dozen example where this is expressly not true of either the crazy or uncrazy ones*; but very generally, I agree with the overall thrust of the hypothesis, especially if, by 'better' we mean 'more likely to be willing to be adventurous'

*For me, it's the opposite, generally speaking. MissKDD being the gold standard for the comms/service combo. I guess Lola Wild would be a good example of atrocious comms/excellent service though 😂

Quite. For my money, Ellie_30_Rose is the exemplary communicator, and a treat in the sack. I've never visited Lola precisely because of her twin-towering reputation for terrible comms and unreliability

Actually this reminds me of a now retired Polish hottie that was a forum darling on here, amongst other places.

Khloe Colindale perchance?

[alabama1]

Like him or not, Trump was right on the matter of 'the crazy ones are better in bed'
Speaking for myself, I can think of half a dozen example where this is expressly not true of either the crazy or uncrazy ones; but very generally, I agree with the overall thrust of the hypothesis, especially if, by 'better' we mean 'more likely to be willing to be adventurous'
Khloe Colindale perchance?

No, but actually i have seen her. Can't remember her comms being bad though. I was remembering 'Gorgeous Vicky'

[Heph]

No, but actually i have seen her. Can't remember her comms being bad though. I was remembering 'Gorgeous Vicky'

Yes, Khloe's comms were, from memory, very good and she was also all-round marvellous.
GV: sadly unknown to me. I gather she was Midlands based?

[alabama1]

Yes, Khloe's comms were, from memory, very good and she was also all-round marvellous.
GV: sadly unknown to me. I gather she was Midlands based?

Birmingham, amongst other places down south lol

[Mkhelen]

It's the difference between being managed by a parlour, brothel with a receptionist or a solo independent sp with her own calender , diary and managing her own phone.

If she can't answer because she's busy it's a good thing, not answering mid BJ service .

We read in the reviews it's very disrespectful to the customer to answer the phone, when In your well paid booking.

If she responds straight away surely she has a dusty phone and crap service

[Strawberry]

It's the difference between being managed by a parlour, brothel with a receptionist or a solo independent sp with her own calender , diary and managing her own phone.

If she can't answer because she's busy it's a good thing, not answering mid BJ service .

We read in the reviews it's very disrespectful to the customer to answer the phone, when In your well paid booking.

If she responds straight away surely she has a dusty phone and crap service

I respond to many enquiries almost immediately, but I am busy/fully booked a long way ahead (4-6 weeks). However some of the rapid response is because I answer whenever possible, some days from when I get up in the morning until I go to sleep at night.

I like to keep on top of my comes, if I see a message or can answer a call, I respond.

[thatsaint]

maybe the blue chip providers, get a tonne of time wasting messages, so it's draining to give great comms to endless timewasters?

Whereas, bad service providers give great comms to get you in the door, then can be lazy.

Just throwing out some thoughts

[Clarence Boddicker]

For me, it's the opposite, generally speaking. MissKDD being the gold standard for the comms/service combo. I guess Lola Wild would be a good example of atrocious comms/excellent service though 😂

Funnily enough, some of the girls with patchy comms offered duos with KDD, namely Sasha Nox and her comms have vastly improved, she must be rubbing off on them

[Haderach]

For me good comms has always, always been a great indicator of the service I will be provided.

[hendrix]

Funnily enough, some of the girls with patchy comms offered duos with KDD, namely Sasha Nox and her comms have vastly improved, she must be rubbing off on them

In more ways than one 

[Paul9144]

For me good comms has always, always been a great indicator of the service I will be provided.

I concur with that, and notice that's it's well reflected in your reviews

[GreyDave]

  Some of the worst text and stroppy messages have lead to fantasic punts the girls havent been interest in the coresponding bit or their command of english bad or you are dealing with the pimp who answers 100 of school boy enquirys so you get short shift

The most well planed and business like have ALWAYS ended up with a perfunctory business like routine from said Service Provider. Ive felt OK but not excited by the episode,

Trump is right the crazy ones are better in bed,  I think he might have something there But no birds come out and said he was great yet

[Nomerzypuntr]

Once I was chatting with a SP, late at night, I asked her what she doing? She sent her dog’s pic, saying she just gave her a shower. I replied when will I get a shower? She didn’t replied to that, then Gudn8 text. But my next visit with her, she showered me. Sometimes we had fight while chatting, but no problem in visit, after all it’s just a transaction..

[Mr Garmin]

For some reason I've just wondered whether it's the same the other way around.  Punter with poor illegible messages = slightly odd = good sex?

Perhaps one of our resident SP's have a view?

I know what I think but it's just a guess and I may be wrong.

[alabama1]

For some reason I've just wondered whether it's the same the other way around.  Punter with poor illegible messages = slightly odd = good sex?

Perhaps one of our resident SP's have a view?

I know what I think but it's just a guess and I may be wrong.

Don't you mean 'good client' ????

[Strawberry]

For some reason I've just wondered whether it's the same the other way around.  Punter with poor illegible messages = slightly odd = good sex?

Perhaps one of our resident SP's have a view?

I know what I think but it's just a guess and I may be wrong.

No but poor communication can indicate he is going to be difficult, a good client is someone who is easy to make arrangements with, communicates well, provides relevant and requested information, confirms as and when requested. Turns up, has a good time. Isn't pushy or indiscrete at any point, has the correct fee...I could go on. When I say communicates well, this is not about grammar, spelling, flounce it's about providing useful, accurate information easily.

Sometimes poor communication improves after the first booking, sometimes it doesn't. I have had clients who have been great in the booking, but difficult with communication and unreliable. There is a limit and if the messing around reaches a certain amount, I will stop accepting bookings no matter how wonderful he is in the booking. Similarly if someone is pushy, unpleasant in a booking, doesn't matter how reliable and easy to make arrangements he is, he will be banned. A good, bad or otherwise client for me is based on the entire interaction from booking through to aftermath.

'Good sex' is subjective and not the primary objective.

[Mr Garmin]

'Good sex' is subjective and not the primary objective.

I realise that, it's business first and foremost.  However, I have met girls that enjoyed their time with me which will be a bonus rather than an objective.

In my real life I have clients who would be judged to be 'on the spectrum' (poor comms, unreliable, irrationally demanding, ridiculously price conscious etc.) and they are without exception a pain in the arse and I dump them as soon as I realise (which is usually pretty quickly) and have been know to advise them to contact the opposition.

[Strawberry]

I realise that, it's business first and foremost.  However, I have met girls that enjoyed their time with me which will be a bonus rather than an objective.

In my real life I have clients who would be judged to be 'on the spectrum' (poor comms, unreliable, irrationally demanding, ridiculously price conscious etc.) and they are without exception a pain in the arse and I dump them as soon as I realise (which is usually pretty quickly) and have been know to advise them to contact the opposition.

On the whole if someone is easy to make arrangements with, meets all the usual criteria, is not pushy - then I do have a good time. For me a good time is not necessarily what might be called 'good sex' or even 'orgasm'. I have orgasmed with some of the most irritating, annoying clients/punters. The ability to bring me to climax does not influence whether I want to see a client or punter again, some very difficult punters can become smug thinking an orgasm suddenly makes up for their other behaviour. It doesn't, it can actually make their behaviour more annoying.

Regards referring on this is tricky because if they are truly very rude, very difficult I would not want anyone else to go through the same, what I sometimes say is 'I hope you can find someone else to help/suit/with more patience/can engage more than I'.

[MLawro93]

If bad communication results in good service, probably just got lucky. Never found a consistent pattern other than if a SP has poor communication, it will put me off entirely. I like comms to be clear and upfront. There is a point that I can be a bit unforgiving with poor comms, but learned to not expect what I consider good communication with others. It isn't fair. As everyone communications differently depending on their wiring, so as long as we can get there in a couple messages it is all good.

I do find that for SPs, the initial point of communication starts with their profile/adverts. If I find out something I consider standard is suddenly an extra over messages, then instant red flag. Indicates poor comms or you aren't managing your profile/advert, puts me off completely.