Latest thoughts on face pics or no face pics on an AW profile?

[Fush]

I know this has been discussed before, but after my most recent punt where I was disapointed, I'd thought I get your latest thoughts on the subject.

My current record for the ladies who hide their face on their AW profile, 3/7 I've been pleased when I saw their face in person. 4/7 I've been disapointed (or not what I was expecting/hoping for).

It's not exactly cheap seeing any lady, and especially when you are taking a risk by not knowing what she looks like. Attraction is a big thing for me, I'm not there simple for a P&D. You could say well only choose ladies with face pics, however out of the 3/7 I was pleased with, 2 were great experiences which I would have missed out on with this rule.

Equally you could say if you are not happy and don't like what you see you could just walk, but easier said than done!

What's your thoughts/experience?

[Blackpool Rock]

I also like to know what the girl looks like and agree attraction is important for me.

Sometimes you can sort of get an idea from partial face pics but sometimes if the girl has videos on her AW page her face may be visible on the thumbnail of the video.
Another thing i've found is if you put her number into your phone and see if she has WhatsApp then quite often a face pic will be on there

Obviously doesn't account for a pure B&S

[PatMacGroin]

I mostly only visit WG's where their face is visible on their profile.

Where the profile didn't include a photo it used to be possible to find face photo's here on UKP. Especially when the validation photo's thread existed. But that option seems to have disappeared.

Occasionally, I have taken a risk where the obscured face photo appeared to give a good impression and reviews confirmed she was good facially.

A pretty face makes a much bigger difference to me than a perfectly toned body.

[Jonestown]

A pretty face makes a much bigger difference to me than a perfectly toned body.

I agree, a pretty face trumps body perfection, I can remember a period early in the 00’s before the onset of photoshop when agencies and girls used actual untouched photos and you could see exactly what was on offer, a golden age for punters.

[Monaco]

Without pics I weigh up my chances against the reviews here if there aren't any I'll pass.
Looks are subjective though.

[Punting2022]

I think partial face pics are better. You can still see if someone is attractive from the partial pic.
I choose sgencies that have selfies and face pics now.
Seeking is vid call before meets.
If a girls ugly i walk

Some send via whatsapp to,

[RandomGuy99]

I can understand why SPs don't want face pics on their profiles. Especially in the era of facial recognition software. I don't mind no face pics.

[Fush]

I also like to know what the girl looks like and agree attraction is important for me.

Sometimes you can sort of get an idea from partial face pics but sometimes if the girl has videos on her AW page her face may be visible on the thumbnail of the video.
Another thing i've found is if you put her number into your phone and see if she has WhatsApp then quite often a face pic will be on there

Obviously doesn't account for a pure B&S

Hadn't thought of some of those methods, so might try those in the future if needed, thanks.

[Fush]

I can understand why SPs don't want face pics on their profiles. Especially in the era of facial recognition software. I don't mind no face pics.

Yeah I can understand that, does make things awkward though. Perhaps a face-pic or partial in their PG?

[Pennine Rover]

I am surprised at the number of blurred photos on profiles.  That should only happen if the photos are NSW.  Clothed, lingerie, bikini photos are fine.  The main escort agencies have excellent photos which tell you what the girl is like, so why on AW profiles?

[Strawberry]

I am surprised at the number of blurred photos on profiles.  That should only happen if the photos are NSW.  Clothed, lingerie, bikini photos are fine.  The main escort agencies have excellent photos which tell you what the girl is like, so why on AW profiles?

AW online safety act censorship is definitely not consistent, and I had noticed groups & agencies seem to be less censored than independents but even that is not predictable.

[Mr Sinister]

Don't care for the face too much unless she's badly deformed or poor hygiene, plus I'm not one for DFK and all that business. I only care for the body when it comes to the physical aspect.

[therichardrichard]

A pretty face is important to me but not an absolute deal breaker so I'd say for me that a face pic is preferable but not essential. I can forgive a lot if they've got a fit body so as long as they've got enough photos for me to determine that then I'm good!

While I have definitely been quietly disappointed with a few faces when I have turned up in the past I have never had anyone that has made me want to walk. What I find worse is when it turns out their photos are very old and out of date or that they are hiding a belly or something.

(As mentioned furthe up I have found the old movie thumbnail trick can sometimes reveal an otherwise mystery face!)

[Alexmck]

Not just AW. Should be all girls? Helps decide on the attractive side if that is important? Is for me?