Roxy Ravishing Pimlico

[marcusp123]

Roxy is well documented on here and is the only girl i go to when in London which is not very often the last few years.
I havn't posted any reviews as it's been a while since i saw her until recently.
Glad to say she is still performing to high kinky standards and will try almost anything.
No need to go into details as it's all been said before.

I paid £250 for the hour which i believe is her normal rate.
Communication via Whatsapp
Nice flat in Pimlico fit for purpose.
Highlights of the meet include anal, gagging deep throat, toys.
She really does seem to be up for anything.
Roxy seems to be just as happy with anal as anything else.
A real pleaser.


External Link/Members Only   External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

No need to go into details as it's all been said before.

Without details it can't be a review mate, none of the previous reviews tell us how long you booked, what you paid or what services you received.

If you read the guide to review writing then post the required details here I'll edit them into your review and put it back in that section as the positive you gave it.

External Link/Members Only

You've used the site regularly for 5 years so you should know what's required in a review.

[marcusp123]

Apologies but as i said i am very rarely in London and only go to see Roxy when there so didn't see the point in adding to the numerous reviews already on here.
But please add...
I paid £250 for the hour which i believe is her normal rate.
Communication via Whatsapp
Nice flat in Pimlico fit for purpose.
Highlights of the meet include anal, gagging deep throat, toys.
She really does seem to be up for anything.
Roxy seems to be just as happy with anal as anything else.
A real pleaser.

Hope this is sufficient, i know i am not much of a contributor but i don't have much to contribute.
I find the threads on here very entertaining and promise to add more reviews if and when any meets occur.

[RandomGuy99]

I think Davie was suggesting that you write a review as it would still be helpful to other members. You've pretty much already written it, but it feels a bit wrong for you to expect a mod to effectively write it for you. The mods have other things to be spending their limited and valuable time on.

[Often Visitor]

Gone now anyway

[RandomGuy99]

Gone now anyway

Probably just on a Christmas break.

[marcusp123]

I only did it like that because he said he would edit it.

"post the required details here I'll edit them into your review and put it back in that section"

[RandomGuy99]

I only did it like that because he said he would edit it.

"post the required details here I'll edit them into your review and put it back in that section"

I think it might be time to learn how to post your own reviews?

[daviemac]

I think Davie was suggesting that you write a review as it would still be helpful to other members. You've pretty much already written it, but it feels a bit wrong for you to expect a mod to effectively write it for you. The mods have other things to be spending their limited and valuable time on.

He's done exactly what I asked him to do, I don't know why you are getting involved.

[daviemac]

I think it might be time to learn how to post your own reviews?

Stay out of moderation issues.

[daviemac]

I only did it like that because he said he would edit it.

"post the required details here I'll edit them into your review and put it back in that section"

Take no notice of the wannabe mod mate, I've sorted it in the way I suggested.

Of course there's far more posts on this thread than there should be due to people involving themselves.

[RandomGuy99]

Take no notice of the wannabe mod mate, I've sorted it in the way I suggested.

Of course there's far more posts on this thread than there should be due to people involving themselves.

Ok, so next time I can't be arsed putting the effort into writing a review, I'll just dump the info into the general thread and let you move it to reviews for me as that is what you're encouraging me to do.  Thanks in advance. 👍

[daviemac]

Ok, so next time I can't be arsed putting the effort into writing a review, I'll just dump the info into the general thread and let you move it to reviews for me as that is what you're encouraging me to do.  Thanks in advance. 👍

It was his first review and as such the new ethos of the site is to give help, guidance and encouragement not for members to act in the way you have and call him out on it. That does nothing to encourage him to post more or for any other members to start contributing.

 

I think Davie was suggesting that you write a review as it would still be helpful to other members.

That is not what I was suggesting at all so what makes you think you can tell a member what I mean? Just to remind you of the rules.

32 Wannabe Mods and/or who do not heed mods/admins' warnings will be banned.

What was posted here was between a moderator and a member, nothing for you to get involved in.

Not that it has anything to do with you but if you had read my post properly you would see I said I would put it BACK in the review section, that denotes that's where it was posted initially before I moved it because of the lack of detail.

If you choose to post a similar review it will also be moved to discussions though in your case you should know better.

BTW all the mods know it's standard procedure in the case of a review lacking detail to move it to discussions then back to reviews if the required details are added.

Stay out of moderation issues.

[RandomGuy99]

It was his first review and as such the new ethos of the site is to give help, guidance and encouragement not for members to act in the way you have and call him out on it. That does nothing to encourage him to post more or for any other members to start contributing.

 That is not what I was suggesting at all so what makes you think you can tell a member what I mean? Just to remind you of the rules.

32 Wannabe Mods and/or who do not heed mods/admins' warnings will be banned.

What was posted here was between a moderator and a member, nothing for you to get involved in.

Not that it has anything to do with you but if you had read my post properly you would see I said I would put it BACK in the review section, that denotes that's where it was posted initially before I moved it because of the lack of detail.

If you choose to post a similar review it will also be moved to discussions though in your case you should know better.

BTW all the mods know it's standard procedure in the case of a review lacking detail to move it to discussions then back to reviews if the required details are added.

Thank you for your detailed explanation of your handling of this review. I can now see that my understanding of how it was being handled was incorrect and you were indeed handling it correctly. I apologise for suggesting otherwise.

[puntingking]

thanks for your first review mate 

[Bartolomeo]

Thanks for your first review 

When she comes back, I need to make a new effort to see her. I had her booked 3 times when she was £250 for 90 mins, but she cancelled on me twice for different reasons and then I had to cancel on her as I got the stupid cold