Soony - tokyo & seoul in uk - Crossharbour

[melter]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comms: ?/10 (quick responses, but rude as hell)
Depends what you classify as comms. Replies pretty quickly, but can be really fucking rude. Clearly does not care to keep a customer happy. Speaks broken english. Definitely handled by the famously known Korean pimp, not the WG.

Location: 6/10
Easy to get to, pretty central, but a bit dodgy with access, and doesn't look all that nice inside.

Price: 2/10
Really expensive for what it is (220 per hour + 100 bareback & cip, plus tons of extras - everything's extra)

The girl: 2/10
So when you text the pimp he gives you a link to a website. You go there and there's the menu with photos. Only two photos for Soony. I thought I'd TOFTT so I went there to see her in person. I don't really care about the price as long as I'm happy with the girl... But when I saw her, I decided to walk away. Overweight, lots of makeup, I am guessing a lot of plastic surgeries (incl. nosejob) - definitely not my type. And that's coming from a guy who already has an Asian thing going.

The meeting: 0/10
Walked away. Not even BB and CIP were convincing enough. I think she'd have to pay me to have sex with her 

Overall: 0/10
I had a little treatment from the pimp, texting me shit after I walked out. Not nice. Deserves a negative for this. Treat your customers well b*tch!

[puntingking]

As someone who don't partake in bb with sps, I am glad there are still a number of members who are on here that do.



Some advice though for when you see non barebakers is to make sure you don't identify yourself to them in your review of these sps as they may blacklist you as you regularly do bb.

I have no problem with you doing bb but some sps might so just something to think about for when you post your next review.

 

[melter]

you'd be surprised how many non barebackers still do it if you ask nicely  maybe it's cause i am fairly good looking and young though, don't know

anyways... people judge but you can get more sh*t if you do owo and not prepare yourself vs if you full on do bb but with adequate preparation. that's why i wrote up this bb quide in here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439162

stay safe

[puntingking]

you'd be surprised how many non barebackers still do it if you ask nicely  maybe it's cause i am fairly good looking and young though, don't know

anyways... people judge but you can get more sh*t if you do owo and not prepare yourself vs if you full on do bb but with adequate preparation. that's why i wrote up this bb quide in here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439162

stay safe

you too mate 
 

[Lou2019]

As someone who don't partake in bb with sps, I am glad there are still a number of members who are on here that do.



Some advice though for when you see non barebakers is to make sure you don't identify yourself to them in your review of these sps as they may blacklist you as you regularly do bb.

I have no problem with you doing bb but some sps might so just something to think about for when you post your next review.

 

You are seriously odd, sucking up to a BB review yet posting your disgust elsewhere

[puntingking]

You are seriously odd, sucking up to a BB review yet posting your disgust elsewhere

Lets look what I said on the other thread -

HIV is my biggest fear, so owo I think is fine but barebacking is a big fat NO for me.

I may not like do bareback with sps but I respect indivudual choices in what they want to partake in or not partake in.
I respect his review, we need reviews on here from all different tastes, kinks and likes and interests when it comes to sex.
I am defending his review, so that others know that if they too seek out barebackers then they can also type up about their experiences.
plus, alot of punters want to avoid barebackers so a bareback review will help them to avoid an sp who would partake in that service. It is a win/win  for all punters no matter whether you seek bareback sex with a sp or not.

I am not a barebacker but I respect his review for what it is.
I may disagree with bareback sex with an sp but i still respect his review. I would much rather the OP to tell me of his experience than not to.


As for what I said on this thread -

As someone who don't partake in bb with sps, I am glad there are still a number of members who are on here that do.



Some advice though for when you see non barebakers is to make sure you don't identify yourself to them in your review of these sps as they may blacklist you as you regularly do bb.

I have no problem with you doing bb but some sps might so just something to think about for when you post your next review.

 

I was giving the op some advice which as a sharing community of information which I am able to do.
I don't see this as "sucking up" as you put it.

[Strawberry]

Lets look what I said on the other thread -

I may not like do bareback with sps but I respect indivudual choices in what they want to partake in or not partake in.
I respect his review, we need reviews on here from all different tastes, kinks and likes and interests when it comes to sex.
I am defending his review, so that others know that if they too seek out barebackers then they can also type up about their experiences.
plus, alot of punters want to avoid barebackers so a bareback review will help them to avoid an sp who would partake in that service. It is a win/win  for all punters no matter whether you seek bareback sex with a sp or not.

I am not a barebacker but I respect his review for what it is.
I may disagree with bareback sex with an sp but i still respect his review. I would much rather the OP to tell me of his experience than not to.


As for what I said on this thread -
I was giving the op some advice which as a sharing community of information which I am able to do.
I don't see this as "sucking up" as you put it.

Just to clarify are you saying you are glad he writes reviews?

[puntingking]

Just to clarify are you saying you are glad he writes reviews?

yes

[Strawberry]

yes

The way you wrote it, the way your post made 10.05pm 17th September reads, is as if you are saying you are glad he engages in bareback intercourse.

Possibly why you've received the reactions and criticism you've received.

[puntingking]

The way you wrote it, the way your post made 10.05pm 17th September reads, is as if you are saying you are glad he engages in bareback intercourse.

Possibly why you've received the reactions and criticism you've received.

I have re worded it down below here for better understanding in what I meant. 

As someone who don't partake in bb with sps, I am glad you still post your bareback reviews as it still helps out this site

[jj98]

They have a new girl Aya. Anyone seen her yet?