Author Topic: Chloe02x - Cheadle  (Read 3570 times)


40 review(s) for Chloe02x (27 positive, 1 neutral, 12 negative) [Indexed by chandlerhandler]

Offline Soulfly007

External Link/Members Only

Been a long time since I punted, decided to treat myself  and see who was available and saw Chloe was working

Had a check on here and saw she had mixed reviews, she’s got a faf body but not reliable

Decided based on the body I’d give it a go.

Meet was all agreed in the morning for an afternoon, 30 minutes before she messaged me, I assumed it would be room details but she instead asked me if I used this website!

I said yes, I checked out your reviews on UKPunting before messaging you.

Her response was she doesn’t see people who use UKPunting, and cancelled the meet.

Moral of the story, lie to WGs if they ask you a question 😂

Shame I missed out on such a good body, but I usually don’t see girls who don’t take facials so I would probably have left feeling like I didn’t get quite what I wanted anyway


Offline OakTree

External Link/Members Only

Been a long time since I punted, decided to treat myself  and see who was available and saw Chloe was working

Had a check on here and saw she had mixed reviews, she’s got a faf body but not reliable

Decided based on the body I’d give it a go.

Meet was all agreed in the morning for an afternoon, 30 minutes before she messaged me, I assumed it would be room details but she instead asked me if I used this website!

I said yes, I checked out your reviews on UKPunting before messaging you.

Her response was she doesn’t see people who use UKPunting, and cancelled the meet.

Moral of the story, lie to WGs if they ask you a question 😂

Shame I missed out on such a good body, but I usually don’t see girls who don’t take facials so I would probably have left feeling like I didn’t get quite what I wanted anyway

School boy error I’m afraid. Should have denied all knowledge.

She seems particularly sensitive to this site probably due to her rather piss poor record on here.

Mainly due to her atrocious admin.



« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 12:21:04 pm by OakTree »

Offline Bustydusty

Yes just say what is uk punting

Offline Aji81

Given her track record she probably double booked and then used this as an excuse to cancel on you.

Offline kayak

I wouldn't feel bad mate, I reckon you dodged a bullet there!

Offline lewisjones23

School boy error I’m afraid. Should have denied all knowledge.

She seems particularly sensitive to this site probably due to her rather piss poor record on here.

Mainly due to her atrocious admin.

+1

If she could get the admin side of things sorted, quite literally just by changing who she currently uses, then she wouldn't get anywhere near as many red reviews as she has.

Nearly all of them are for ghosting/radio silence and the general feeling is that she is very good once in the room

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
I’ve seen her regularly since she started. She’s sent me the screenshot of this conversation and asked me to post it so people can see this for what it was, as a few lies in the review

Screenshot of another punter's messages removed
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 08:14:34 pm by daviemac »
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

I’ve seen her regularly since she started. She’s sent me the screenshot of this conversation and asked me to post it so people can see this for what it was, as a few lies in the review



Begs the question that why does she ' ban ' UKP members when she clearly does see known UKP members

How does she know you're a member? who reached out to who?
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 08:14:45 pm by daviemac »

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
Begs the question that why does she ' ban ' UKP members when she clearly does see known UKP members

How does she know you're a member? who reached out to who?
She knows I use it because I’ve reviewed her on here years ago. So sent it me I guess
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

She knows I use it because I’ve reviewed her on here years ago. So sent it me I guess

I don't think she has a blanket ban on UKP members, sounds to me it was more of an excuse not to see this punter.

If the screenshot is real, which to me it does look like, the OP has came over a bit odd and saying he'll put a review on the way he has, its almost like it is putting pressure on the WG


Offline OakTree

I’ve seen her regularly since she started. She’s sent me the screenshot of this conversation and asked me to post it so people can see this for what it was, as a few lies in the review



Another school boy error having the same username on here and AW and by the looks of it WhatsApp.

The review does seem to differ from the screenshot. It could be argued the red doesn’t stand, not that it’s going to make much difference to the fact she’s pretty inconsistent when it comes to admin.

« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 08:14:58 pm by daviemac »

Offline OakTree

I’ve seen her regularly since she started. She’s sent me the screenshot of this conversation and asked me to post it so people can see this for what it was, as a few lies in the review


How do you go about booking her if you don’t mind me asking?

Offline lewisjones23

Another school boy error having the same username on here and AW and by the looks of it WhatsApp.

The review does seem to differ from the screenshot. It could be argued the red doesn’t stand, not that it’s going to make much difference to the fact she’s pretty inconsistent when it comes to admin.

Think she has saved the number as that name

Good point, she / the person who does her phone actually cancelled this booking, an improvement actually, usually just leaves them high and dry

Offline OakTree

Think she has saved the number as that name

Good point, she / the person who does her phone actually cancelled this booking, an improvement actually, usually just leaves them high and dry

Yeah I’m guessing the delay to cancel was them telling her about the booking and the mention of UKP then her saying no cancel it.

I’ve had her in my hot list for ages but it’s the risk of being fucked about that’s stopped me from trying to book her.

I actually nearly booked her today but pulled back from pulling the trigger.

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
How do you go about booking her if you don’t mind me asking?
I just text the number on her profile the morning that I want to book
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I’ve seen her regularly since she started. She’s sent me the screenshot of this conversation and asked me to post it so people can see this for what it was, as a few lies in the review

Screenshot of another punter's messages removed
Are you for real???? posting a screenshot of another punter's messages on behalf of an escort. Not the way this site works mate, we are NOT a support service for escorts, especially one with loads of negative reviews.

Care to explain your motives and why she knows you are a member?

Looks to me like you are using your membership of this site to gain favour with this SP, are you getting a discount of freebies for sticking up for her?

Offline lewisjones23

Yeah I’m guessing the delay to cancel was them telling her about the booking and the mention of UKP then her saying no cancel it.

I’ve had her in my hot list for ages but it’s the risk of being fucked about that’s stopped me from trying to book her.

I actually nearly booked her today but pulled back from pulling the trigger.

Fantastic at blowjobs and shagging

Fucking awful at comms or anything admin related and partial to leaving punters high and dry

« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 08:34:43 pm by lewisjones23 »

Offline lewisjones23

I just text the number on her profile the morning that I want to book

Seen as you are on friendly terms with her, any chance of asking what the deal is with why she fucks so many punters around and leaves them like lemons outside hotels?

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
Are you for real???? posting a screenshot of another punter's messages on behalf of an escort. Not the way this site works mate, we are NOT a support service for escorts, especially one with loads of negative reviews.

Care to explain your motives and why she knows you are a member?

Looks to me like you are using your membership of this site to gain favour with this SP, are you getting a discount of freebies for sticking up for her?
No, she just asked me to post it for her. And when I read the review it didn’t match the conversation so seemed the right thing to do to show what was said instead of a false review
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
No, she just asked me to post it for her. And when I read the review it didn’t match the conversation so seemed the right thing to do to show what was said instead of a false review
Can you point out the difference between what was in the screenshot and what is in the review? "I post reviews" and "I checked your reviews" is not too dissimilar, both let her know he uses this site which is the reason she cancelled. The review states he uses UKP and the screenshot states he uses UKP. He even offered at the end to not post if she didn't agree.

You haven't answered the other points I made, what are your motives for posting on behalf of an escort.

One other point would you be happy if your communications with an SP were posted on the internet for all to see? :unknown: 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 09:13:33 pm by daviemac »

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
Can you point out the difference between what was in the screenshot and what is in the review? "I post reviews" and "I checked your reviews" is not too dissimilar, both let her know he uses this site which is the reason she cancelled. The review states he uses UKP and the screenshot states he uses UKP. He even offered at the end to not post if she didn't agree.

You haven't answered the other points I made, what are your motives for posting on behalf of an escort.

One other point would you be happy if your communications with an SP were posted on the internet for all to see? :unknown:
There’s several lies in the review. He says she asked him if he uses UKP, she never. He told her he reviews girls on here in his 2nd message when she hadn’t mentioned anything. He says she cancelled 30 minutes before when it was over an hour. It’s clearly a dishonest review.

My motives were the truth. I like this site for seeing which girls are best to book, I don’t want to read a pack of lies
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

The OP hasn't been online since early this afternoon, I can't imagine he'd have thought it'd blow up like this upon his return

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
There’s several lies in the review. He says she asked him if he uses UKP, she never. He told her he reviews girls on here in his 2nd message when she hadn’t mentioned anything. He says she cancelled 30 minutes before when it was over an hour. It’s clearly a dishonest review.

My motives were the truth. I like this site for seeing which girls are best to book, I don’t want to read a pack of lies
How accurate the review is is debatable, the fact is she found out he was a member on here and cancelled the booking.

It is not up to you to come on here on your white charger posting on behalf of any escort, if you have any concerns about any review then report it and the mods will deal with it.

Last time I'm going to ask, - would you be happy for a member on here posting screenshots of your communications with service providers.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
The OP hasn't been online since early this afternoon, I can't imagine he'd have thought it'd blow up like this upon his return
I've been taken away from the OP by SNation posting another member's messages on behalf of an escort, something totally unacceptable.

Offline lewisjones23

How accurate the review is is debatable, the fact is she found out he was a member on here and cancelled the booking.

It is not up to you to come on here on your white charger posting on behalf of any escort, if you have any concerns about any review then report it and the mods will deal with it.

Last time I'm going to ask, - would you be happy for a member on here posting screenshots of your communications with service providers.

If he is he could post his own comms with this WG today, see what really got said between them before he came on here on her behalf 🤷🏻‍♂️

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
How accurate the review is is debatable, the fact is she found out he was a member on here and cancelled the booking.

It is not up to you to come on here on your white charger posting on behalf of any escort, if you have any concerns about any review then report it and the mods will deal with it.

Last time I'm going to ask, - would you be happy for a member on here posting screenshots of your communications with service providers.
If I’d posted a review about booking an escort and the screenshot was me booking the escort I wouldn’t mind at all. If I was lying about it I’d probably mind
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
If I’d posted a review about booking an escort and the screenshot was me booking the escort I wouldn’t mind at all. If I was lying about it I’d probably mind
Don't believe you. The most unfortunate thing about this is you don't realise or accept that posting another member's messages on here on behalf of an escort is way out of order.

How about you post screenshots of your comms with this escort about this review, unedited I might add.

Offline SNation

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 20
Don't believe you. The most unfortunate thing about this is you don't realise or accept that posting another member's messages on here on behalf of an escort is way out of order.

How about you post screenshots of your comms with this escort about this review, unedited I might add.
The screenshot she sent has his WhatsApp photo on it (which I obviously cropped before posting here) and she talks about another booking she had today. So that will be much worse than what I posted before
Banned reason: Posting screenshots on behalf of an SP, discussing punter with her.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline lewisjones23

The screenshot she sent has his WhatsApp photo on it (which I obviously cropped before posting here) and she talks about another booking she had today. So that will be much worse than what I posted before

Are you in direct comms with the WG on a private number or communicating via the number on her AW, and therefore via the person who handles her comms?

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
The screenshot she sent has his WhatsApp photo on it (which I obviously cropped before posting here) and she talks about another booking she had today. So that will be much worse than what I posted before
So you're lying then. "If I was lying about it I’d probably mind"

And are you really saying she is discussing other punters booking with you? 

The more you post the more a wrong'un you look.

Offline lewisjones23

So you're lying then. "If I was lying about it I’d probably mind"

And are you really saying she is discussing other punters booking with you? 

The more you post the more a wrong'un you look.

It looks that way but this WG is well know for using somone to do her comms, so depending on if he is using her main or a private number, he might be discussing all this with a complete unknown randomer in the situation

That is such a strange thing to be doing

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It looks that way but this WG is well know for using somone to do her comms, so depending on if he is using her main or a private number, he might be discussing all this with a complete unknown randomer in the situation

That is such a strange thing to be doing
The whole thing is totally out of order mate, even if you forget about him discussing other punters with the escort or her pimp, posting a screenshot of someone else's messages is just not on, he shouldn't even be in a position to see them.

Offline lewisjones23

The whole thing is totally out of order mate, even if you forget about him discussing other punters with the escort or her pimp, posting a screenshot of someone else's messages is just not on, he shouldn't even be in a position to see them.

There will 100% be more to it as well.

I personally suspect he has been communicating directly with the WG and the unedited messages would be damming

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
There will 100% be more to it as well.

I personally suspect he has been communicating directly with the WG and the unedited messages would be damming
I've given him a chance to explain it and to post the screenshots of his comms with her but he's unwilling so only one thing left.

Offline lewisjones23

I've given him a chance to explain it and to post the screenshots of his comms with her but he's unwilling so only one thing left.

Mindblowing what some punters think at times

Offline OakTree

Mindblowing what some punters think at times

He wasn’t thinking. He probably did have her personal number and didn’t have to deal with her assistant and therefore thought he had a special relationship with her. He was never going to show the rest of the messages.

Offline lewisjones23

He wasn’t thinking. He probably did have her personal number and didn’t have to deal with her assistant and therefore thought he had a special relationship with her. He was never going to show the rest of the messages.

+ 1

In essence, cuntstruck  :hi:

Offline Sinnerman10

I’ve said it before, I say it again,
it was pussy that made man eat
from the forbidden tree.  :sarcastic:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I said yes, I checked out your reviews on UKPunting before messaging you.

Her response was she doesn’t see people who use UKPunting, and cancelled the meet.
I don't know why you are telling SPs you are a member on here and that you post reviews, it is not the done thing, you being a member here should be kept to yourself.

By telling escorts you review on here makes us think that you are using the site to gain favour and that gets you banned.

Offline Bustydusty

I really don’t get why anyone on here would book her unless they had a solid plan b nearby - preferably in the same hotel

Offline lewisjones23

I really don’t get why anyone on here would book her unless they had a solid plan b nearby - preferably in the same hotel

Good advice

I held off booking her again until she started working more locally to me again, she isn't one to go out of your way for or to go all in on, there will always be that risk of being ghosted by her

Offline Shanks

Well I can say say she 100% does leave punters high and dry , see my review
Obviously dislikes most punters and likes her few patsies I’d say .
Did manage to see her once , great body but very vanilla booking
My advice book a more reliable and better service girl