Isabella - Herbal Clinic Cricklewood

[Duron]

Last time there was in 2020 to see the Russian Daria.

1 hour. £55 entrance. + £70 for HR and B2B.
Went specially for Isabella from having read the reviews. I was attracted by words like 'huge' and 'massive'. However, its all in how your mind interprits those words, I always find.

Had the usual parade of girls saying Hi in a 1 sec flash. No names given - had to ask. But I was there for Isabella, so it was only a side show for me.

Boobs not huge or massive to me. Big areola was mentioned in a review. Hmmm, ok a little larger than usual. Not small.

Isabella was pleasant and playful, but fell short of my expectations somewhat. Play with boobs was restricted, nipple sucking was not allowed. A tit wank on the B2B was ok though not special. The boobs were natural but were not large enough or saggy enough for a good swinging boob session, as most boobmen like.

It was a neutral experience for me. YMMV as she is friendly.

To compare, not proactive like Julia of Romford.
No kissing at all. Julia is great at it.
Boobs not that big, and not dangly enough. (Claudia of 77a Berwick St was the gold standard in this. 25 years ago!)
Limited service (to me anyway)
Still looking for a 'Camilla replacement'.

[scouting]

Links -

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[LLPunting]

Thanks for this counterbalance 

Sorry it didn't measure up.  GL with next foray. 

[OliverK]

Last time there was in 2020 to see the Russian Daria.

1 hour. £55 entrance. + £70 for HR and B2B.
Went specially for Isabella from having read the reviews. I was attracted by words like 'huge' and 'massive'. However, its all in how your mind interprits those words, I always find.

Had the usual parade of girls saying Hi in a 1 sec flash. No names given - had to ask. But I was there for Isabella, so it was only a side show for me.

Boobs not huge or massive to me. Big areola was mentioned in a review. Hmmm, ok a little larger than usual. Not small.

Isabella was pleasant and playful, but fell short of my expectations somewhat. Play with boobs was restricted, nipple sucking was not allowed. A tit wank on the B2B was ok though not special. The boobs were natural but were not large enough or saggy enough for a good swinging boob session, as most boobmen like.

It was a neutral experience for me. YMMV as she is friendly.

To compare, not proactive like Julia of Romford.
No kissing at all. Julia is great at it.
Boobs not that big, and not dangly enough. (Claudia of 77a Berwick St was the gold standard in this. 25 years ago!)
Limited service (to me anyway)
Still looking for a 'Camilla replacement'.

I think you and I are very much aligned on this.
I NEED the boobs to be D cup at the absolute minimum for me to even consider visiting the SP.
I've also been to see masseuses that reviewers said had 'huge naturals' and on arrival I was disappointed to find that they were a C cup at best. Either that or they were large but so saggy that they reached her belly button.
There was a girl called Teesha at this place who had spectacular tits but I'm not sure if she's still there.

Shame your experience with Isabella didn't deliver, she's on my HL as well. What cup size would you say she is anyway?
If you like them big I'd recommend Kathalina at TP, but bear in mind that they're fake (well done fakes imo) and you have to see her in a shabby flat.
If you insist on naturals then try Dina Massage Heaven in Marylebone.

I like the sound of Julia in Romford but Essex is too far for me.

[LLPunting]

Young Julia the "masseuse" who reportedly no longer gives blow jobs?  Her naturals were only a C at most, pert and young but only C.

[Duron]

Young Julia the "masseuse" who reportedly no longer gives blow jobs?  Her naturals were only a C at most, pert and young but only C.

OliverK, she said they are C cup. I think us connosiores need a boob quality guide as words do not explore the nuances of the connosoire. I like the Christy Canyon variety. Large areolas if possible. Never small areolas on any size boobs. Big nipples yes, suckable. Enough swingy-ness to wrap around cock. Some exampoles:
Christy Canyon (swingy)
Stella Fox (swingy)
Haley Cummings (all rounder)
Tiana Wolfe (for the areola. Areola lovers need a good definition of colour between them and boob. Black on black doesn't work)
Buffy/Lucy Wilde (for the sheer fullness and weight)
Camilla (of TP - small frame large naturals you can see from behind)
etc.

Kathalina I am keen on checking out, even though fake. I have had some good fakes over the years.
How would she compare on the above list?

Dina I have seen at Masha's. Both perfect shape and larger. She seems to have lost weight on her AW.
Some others I used to like seem to have lost weight from what I gather. Therefore not seen recently. Jess (Ego), Lora (Leightonstone).

I'd like to see Jane of London Bridge if someone can give me a better guide as to her boobiness. It's not worth the wasted opportunity if disappointment is a risk.

Also, full access to enjoy the boobs is a must. I once saw a black girl who said 'these are yours. You can do anything you want with them'.

Julia of Romford - yes C cup. The DFK makes up for it.

[LLPunting]

Agree Duron C's don't measure up for a proper titfuck that provides a fully enclosed fleshy haven even for the non-girthy dick I barely need to "pack".
If a girl can crank her neck to give you a suck as you emerge from her cleavage then that might suffice.  Pretty sure Julia used to do that for me.

Don't recall ever getting Lora to crouch or lie down so I could enjoy a full envelopment from her (haven't seen her since she got a reduction) and I don't even remember being permitted to glazing her chest either.


 

[OliverK]

OliverK, she said they are C cup. I think us connosiores need a boob quality guide as words do not explore the nuances of the connosoire.

100% agree.  I was thinking about making one actually. 

I like the Christy Canyon variety. Large areolas if possible. Never small areolas on any size boobs. Big nipples yes, suckable. Enough swingy-ness to wrap around cock. Some exampoles:
Christy Canyon (swingy)
Stella Fox (swingy)
Haley Cummings (all rounder)
Tiana Wolfe (for the areola. Areola lovers need a good definition of colour between them and boob. Black on black doesn't work)
Buffy/Lucy Wilde (for the sheer fullness and weight)

I've never heard of any of these women and Google is not much help as it can only find two of them.

Kathalina I am keen on checking out, even though fake. I have had some good fakes over the years.
How would she compare on the above list?

Vaguely similar to Haley Cummings.

Dina I have seen at Masha's. Both perfect shape and larger. She seems to have lost weight on her AW.
Some others I used to like seem to have lost weight from what I gather. Therefore not seen recently. Jess (Ego), Lora (Leightonstone).

Dina has lost weight and is slimmer than she was about 5 years ago. Tits are still large but not as full as they were. Good service and very pretty face though (imo).
Definitely swingy enough for a good titwank.

I'd like to see Jane of London Bridge if someone can give me a better guide as to her boobiness. It's not worth the wasted opportunity if disappointment is a risk.

Also, full access to enjoy the boobs is a must.

Judging by recent reviews you may only be allowed to touch with your hands so better ask her first.

[moonlight_lad]

Judging by recent reviews you may only be allowed to touch with your hands so better ask her first.

Jane takes only her top off and her cup is no bigger than Julia's. If you are looking for better massage than an erotic one, you can take a chance.  Having read my own review of Jane, I have mentioned that Jane is D cup. All I can remember is that hers is no bigger than Julia's. She also allows to play with hers.  I had given neutral for Jane.

[moonlight_lad]

To compare, not proactive like Julia of Romford.
No kissing at all. Julia is great at it.

I was keen to read your review of Julia