Author Topic: Too good to be true? (Read 5278 times)

FifeMac · « **on:** November 25, 2012, 12:34:10 pm »

Got a reverse booking up for a fortnights time and had loads of bids for it. Have managed to narrow it down, taking out the time wasters, barebackers and those that simply don't read the details!

I'm so unsure on this one tho' -
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She has good feedback but reverse image searches bring up loads of other escort sites around the world! From Canada to Norway. Some say she is an EE, others Russian. Yet her primary language is shown as English.

Should I put this in the Declined pile???

Matium · « **Reply #1 on:** November 25, 2012, 12:58:32 pm »

How much is she charging you?

Because she pops us as Alisa and Valeria and in her London incarnation she's Lucia

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

£180 an hour

External Link/Members Only

FifeMac · « **Reply #2 on:** November 25, 2012, 01:07:34 pm »

Less than that for 2 hours!!!

Matium · « **Reply #3 on:** November 25, 2012, 01:13:03 pm »

It's a con then.

Bait 'n' Switch.

One for the discard pile.

blackburnian · « **Reply #4 on:** November 25, 2012, 01:14:55 pm »

I recognise a couple of the names who have left her feedback (seen some of the same girls as them) so i would say the feedback is genuine if that helps .

Blackburnian

k · « **Reply #5 on:** November 25, 2012, 01:55:28 pm »

Quote from: scotsbigmac on November 25, 2012, 12:34:10 pm

She has good feedback but reverse image searches bring up loads of other escort sites around the world! From Canada to Norway.

The resolution of the AW image for her primary photo is 768 × 1024. The question you need to answer is: can Google find images of that resolution or higher? The ones listed as being dupes are lower res, which could mean that they have been lifted from AW. Without going through the whole list 374 × 560 is about the best I could see.

ampersand · « **Reply #6 on:** November 26, 2012, 03:09:23 am »

Don't put it in the decline pile!!! Go to see her - if it isn't the girl in the photo, walk away. Contact one or more of the other possibles first to see if they will give you the same deal at a later date as an insurance. At worst, you will end up seeing someone else you may have seen anyway, at best you will see a real looker.

FifeMac · « **Reply #7 on:** November 27, 2012, 06:43:53 am »

Quote from: sgg13 on November 26, 2012, 03:09:23 am

Don't put it in the decline pile!!! Go to see her - if it isn't the girl in the photo, walk away. Contact one or more of the other possibles first to see if they will give you the same deal at a later date as an insurance. At worst, you will end up seeing someone else you may have seen anyway, at best you will see a real looker.

Already thought of that, but it won't work. The reverse booking is for 8am for 2 hours and then my train home is at 11.30. I'm working away from home and prefer punts first thing in the morning.

So I'm going to have to take a gamble on 1 girl although I'll happily turn them away if its bait and switch. But obviously I want to minimise the risk of going on a 6 hour train journey frustrated!!

This one seems to have split the camp!! Still unsure. Decisions decisions!!

k · « **Reply #8 on:** November 27, 2012, 07:40:03 am »

Quote from: scotsbigmac on November 27, 2012, 06:43:53 am

Already thought of that, but it won't work. The reverse booking is for 8am for 2 hours and then my train home is at 11.30. I'm working away from home and prefer punts first thing in the morning.

So I'm going to have to take a gamble on 1 girl although I'll happily turn them away if its bait and switch. But obviously I want to minimise the risk of going on a 6 hour train journey frustrated!!

This one seems to have split the camp!! Still unsure. Decisions decisions!!

I somehow doubt that an 8am appointment would be anything other than genuine. Two things though:-

(1) Never let on that your itinerary is tight - there was a case a while ago of a guy who visited a girl in Hillingdon area, he was due to fly from Heathrow soon after his meeting with this girl. She used time-wasting tactics to ensure her knickers stayed on until he had to leave.

(2) Make sure she read the time on your RB correctly. I once put an RB up for 9am and got a lot of takers, but most, yes most, thought that I meant 9pm.

FifeMac · « **Reply #9 on:** November 30, 2012, 03:17:35 pm »

Ok, it's decision time. Have narrowed it down to three so Im gonna let you guys make the decision for me!

I just can't decide which to choose! They all provide the services Im looking for, all look good IMO, so its an open vote - who am I booking??!?!

Decision made at 12 noon tomorrow so get yer votes in and spend my money!!

Option 1 - External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Option 2 - External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Option 3 - External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

D_smith24 · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2012, 06:17:44 pm »

The 3rd one is fit as, she looks like she'd be a naughty fuck aswell

blackburnian · « **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2012, 07:15:25 pm »

Id find it reasonably hard to choose between the 3- I'd have to be looking at all 3 likes lists and seeing if anything really took my fancy, other than that its down to price and the risk factor !

Blackburnian

Matium · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2012, 07:18:44 pm »

There's something of a wild look with Miss Danni, I'd say option 3

Stiltskin · « **Reply #13 on:** December 01, 2012, 02:34:31 am »

1st one is too dowdy, 2nd too glam (fake?), the 3rd looks like the best option.

The President · « **Reply #14 on:** December 01, 2012, 08:29:38 am »

3rd one looks very much like a timewaster I experienced before (3rd pic)
Wanted train fair up front and professed to be a squirter - just checked my hot list and profile dead so may not be

I'd agree second looks too glam but I would

Convince Me · « **Reply #15 on:** December 01, 2012, 08:42:17 am »

I love the way no1 vets her punters by asking for a photo to turn her on. Are you brave enough? We as punters do it all the time & are happy to dismiss with the click of the mouse.

My votes goes to No1, as I'm so self conseted, how dare she decline me on my looks alone!

essexbwoy · « **Reply #16 on:** December 01, 2012, 09:02:29 am »

I'd go for the 3rd one, Miss Danni. Wish I lived up north looking at her pics and prices, British too!

jeremiah · « **Reply #17 on:** November 28, 2014, 04:19:36 pm »

met mss danni last week in liverpool and she was great. Posted on Jessica as well a couple of years back, definately genuine but no longer available

anbceo · « **Reply #18 on:** November 29, 2014, 11:26:28 pm »

Jessica is still available. Maybe not in the NW, but she's still working.

Face pics here, I've seen her IRL and they are accurate. External Link/Members Only

cylon · « **Reply #19 on:** November 29, 2014, 11:48:30 pm »

Quote from: anbceo on November 29, 2014, 11:26:28 pm

Jessica is still available. Maybe not in the NW, but she's still working.

Face pics here, I've seen her IRL and they are accurate. External Link/Members Only

Here's her adult work profile External Link/Members Only I've seen her too. She's not the same Jessica as the OP

longballs · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2014, 11:24:56 am »

I saw the Jessica in the original post jessica xjx who is probably no longer working External Link/Members Only it was about 12 months ago, but just in case... she was a shit punt. Was older and heavier than her pics (we expect this to some degree) but at those prices you don't expect a gut (I paid less as it was a RB). She kept me waiting a lot, short changed me with time and generally put in very little effort.

This girl xoxojessicaxoxox looks hot, but she`s not for me with those prices.

Author Topic: Too good to be true? (Read 5278 times)

k

k

D_smith24

The President

essexbwoy

jeremiah

anbceo

cylon

longballs

Member Benefits