Vicky_28 - Feltham

[gbawekanu]

External Link/Members Only


Location:
The flat is just a few minutes' walk from Feltham station. It’s on a relatively quiet street and offers a good level of discretion.

Price:
£150 for the hour (Good value for money).

Appearance:
Based on her pictures on AW, I was not sure what to expect as she does not have any picture showing her face. In person, she looks slightly different but still very attractive. Her body is nicely proportioned with minimal body fat, although not as toned as the photos might suggest. I’d rate her looks around 8/10 for both body and face.

Experience:
We started with a shower, followed by some foreplay and OWO, which was skillful—around 8/10 in terms of technique. We moved through several positions, and she seemed engaged throughout. There was no need for lube, and she appeared to be enjoying herself. After about 10 minutes, we wrapped up round one. We had a casual chat before initiating round two, which she picked up on easily and delivered with the same enthusiasm and finished with A-level.

Would I return?
Yes. Overall, I’d rate the experience a consistent 8/10 across all areas. 150 is great value for money with A-level included.

[Lorachoop]

can't go wrong with Vicky but you are still using AI to write reviews even after a ban 

[iq129]

can't go wrong with Vicky but you are still using AI to write reviews even after a ban 

How can one tell if AI is being used?

[Haderach]

can't go wrong with Vicky but you are still using AI to write reviews even after a ban 

Is that against the site rules, I could not find anything about it under reviews.

[Easygoingdude]

How can one tell if AI is being used?

Normally a double hyphen "--" is a big give away

[gbawekanu]

can't go wrong with Vicky but you are still using AI to write reviews even after a ban 

No I did not use AI for this review.

[Head1]

can't go wrong with Vicky but you are still using AI to write reviews even after a ban 

Not everyone has perfect grammar, and if AI can help punters express their thoughts better, it could be good.

As long as the opinions are unique and not copied and pasted. Focus on what's being said, not how bling it is.

AI is going to be a big part of this site for the non-members  so many members are going to become more aware of it 

[divinemadman]

Not everyone has perfect grammar, and if AI can help punters express their thoughts better, it could be good.

As long as the opinions are unique and not copied and pasted. Focus on what's being said, not how bling it is.

AI is going to be a big part of this site for the non-members  so many members are going to become more aware of it 

I think a lot of people confuse using AI to edit what you've already written vs using it to write the whole thing from scratch. If someone's just cleaning up grammar or structure, don't really see the issue. If you're using it to pump out fake reviews which it can do in an instant then that's where it crosses a line.