Sexy Jasmine Thai - Paddington W2

[doc friend]

From now on.  If I am not at least satisfied with a punt and there is false advertising then it’s an automatic Red Negative.  Regardless of how good the service is.

I cannot believe that as far as I can read no one doing the reviews have called out that her pictures give an indication of her looks.  ?   Either photoshopped 98% or the pictures are at least 10+ years old

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

She is not a size 6.  More 10-12. And much older and less good looking than the pictures.
Why are the reviews not saying this. ?  Do we all think with our dicks. ?or just want the AW feed back return?

The service was ok.  The BJ was ok.  The sex was ok.   But I just didn’t fancy her. And really I need to grow a pair and walk.   

1 hour at £150.   Nice warm flat.  In W2.
The session. Was in the last 10 days. 

[Veinspulser]

Many thanks for your realistic info.
Quite useful...

[Pleasure4ever]

Just double checked my old review.
I have indeed indicated her age in my review..

Quote

“ Girl
Must be around 33-36 as faded tattoo gives away her age.
Very pretty, lovely smile, hair immaculate every time. Small cup A but natural, shame about the silly artwork on her which doesn’t age well.”

I’ve seen her many times, last time probably 4 months ago and she was nowhere near size 10-12, so must be the chocolate she’s getting from the punters!

Conclusion
Never bring a WG any sweets it’ll backfire!!

[JonasG]

I did mention in my neutral review that she was older than her pics and not as good looking.

But yeah overrated WG for me but she seems to have a good record.

[anonymouse72]

Thanks for the review. I questioned myself whether or not I'd find her as attractive as portrayed and so didn't visit her recently. You've saved me a trip this week also so cheers. None of the current Thai crop are enticing me in currently so may revisit Mulan at Olina.

[PilotMan]

I cannot believe that as far as I can read no one doing the reviews have called out that her pictures give an indication of her looks.  ?   Either photoshopped 98% or the pictures are at least 10+ years old
........
Why are the reviews not saying this. ?  Do we all think with our dicks. ?or just want the AW feed back return?

The session. Was in the last 10 days.

@doc friend

I don't think you read any of the reviews, plenty of them describe the over use of photoshop, her size etc.

Don't blame others if you can't be bothered to read the reviews properly.



Here's my description of her in April 2024

"The Girl:

Jasmine is like her pictures, but they are typically Photoshopped to make her look slimmer and her face more angular, whereas in reality her face is rounder and her body is squarish, as opposed to a coke bottle shape. She is a size 8, but not toned. Nice C cup titties, large protruding nipples. She stands around 5,4”."

As other punters have mentioned, she appears to have put on weight recently too.

[ScottishWidower1982]

If you had a shit time - or feel cheated - just leave a review and move on.

I left a recent positive review for Jasmine as I thought she was hot and service was good. Been back twice since. Still hot and services got better each time.

I’ve never left or received AW feedback, I couldn’t care less.

Of course we are thinking with our dicks, we are paying prostitutes to have sex. What else are we thinking with?

[tp69]

She is not a size 6.  More 10-12.

If she's a size 12, I'll kiss your ass. Seen her 3 times (not for the last 2 months) and I'd say she's a size 8. Big difference between an 8 and a 12 in women's physiques.

[lillythesavage]

From now on.  If I am not at least satisfied with a punt and there is false advertising then it’s an automatic Red Negative.  Regardless of how good the service is.

I cannot believe that as far as I can read no one doing the reviews have called out that her pictures give an indication of her looks.  ?   Either photoshopped 98% or the pictures are at least 10+ years old

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

 
Why are the reviews not saying this. ?  Do we all think with our dicks. ?or just want the AW feed back return?

Reads like you made a choice on AW feedback alone  .

Then angry man, who handed over 150 quid to a woman " I did not fancy " had a " OK "  bunk up comes on her to vent without reading what others have said  , blaming them for your own decisions  , for thinking with their dicks when they paying to unload said dicks.

Advertising standards may help you  .

[magnetico]

She's been probably getting fatter, as she was fairly slim in Jan 2024.

Happens with a lot of Thais, some are starting to take Ozempic.