Lamaison Bury.

[Bigerection]

Not been to Lamaison for a while so not up to speed with the current girls and thinking of paying visit tomorrow.
Anyone got.any info on these hotties?
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Cheers

[Princealbert1985]

I personally can't help you here, haven't been for a very long time, but Jessica and Cherry look right up my street

[lewisjones23]

They used to let WG take the piss there, probably still do, so I'd be phoning to make sure the WG is actually in the building before setting off on any sort of journey

[Bustydusty]

They used to let WG take the piss there, probably still do, so I'd be phoning to make sure the WG is actually in the building before setting off on any sort of journey

Definitely do that

[Blackpool Rock]

Cherry's worth a punt IMO, seen her twice but not reviewed yet 

[Blackpool Rock]

They used to let WG take the piss there, probably still do, so I'd be phoning to make sure the WG is actually in the building before setting off on any sort of journey

Yeah I tend to book after the start of their shift so they should already be there.

Brooke was always worth a punt but I lost count of the number of times she didn't show for her shift, probably more than she actually made it to work 
I see she was due to work yesterday but suddenly dropped off the rota at the last minute, wonder if she will make it on Saturday  My money is on No 

[Bigerection]

Cherry's worth a punt IMO, seen her twice but not reviewed yet 

Cheers for the info B R. Does Cherry kiss?

[sandy2000]

I’ve not been for ages but I remember booking one Girl who turned up late and, whilst I was waiting, another rang in to say she had run out of Petrol on the Motorway.

Was the guy on the desk called Nigel ?

He wasnt happy that day 

[lewisjones23]

I’ve not been for ages but I remember booking one Girl who turned up late and, whilst I was waiting, another rang in to say she had run out of Petrol on the Motorway.

Was the guy on the desk called Nigel ?

He wasnt happy that day 

Its his fault that the girls take the piss there, he lets them do whatever they want and had the attitude of fuck the punters.

Most organisations from big to small want to have their customers at the top of their priorities, at LM, customers are treated as the lowest priority going

[Blackpool Rock]

Cheers for the info B R. Does Cherry kiss?

Not me she didn't, I did ask her if she did and she said no but perhaps she just "Discretioned" me out however as a general I don't think it's on the table which is a real shame

[Blackpool Rock]

Its his fault that the girls take the piss there, he lets them do whatever they want and had the attitude of fuck the punters.

Most organisations from big to small want to have their customers at the top of their priorities, at LM, customers are treated as the lowest priority going

I do agree that a lot of the girls take the piss turning up or rather not turning up when they don't feel like it on a whim however there are a lot of girls working there as it suits them to be able to pick and choose their days and hours to fit in around childcare etc

[VitIron]

They used to let WG take the piss there, probably still do, so I'd be phoning to make sure the WG is actually in the building before setting off on any sort of journey

I did that as well. I rang them before setting off and was told that the WG I wanted to see would be arriving soon.

When I got there (a twenty mile journey) I was told that she wasn't coming in

[Duke of Earl]

Not me she didn't, I did ask her if she did and she said no but perhaps she just "Discretioned" me out however as a general I don't think it's on the table which is a real shame

It was a no with me too

[Duke of Earl]

I think both Cherry and Charlie used to work at Ladybirds. Cherry might still do the odd shift there

[TomTank]

I do agree that a lot of the girls take the piss turning up or rather not turning up when they don't feel like it on a whim however there are a lot of girls working there as it suits them to be able to pick and choose their days and hours to fit in around childcare etc

I get how people get annoyed and accuse them of taking the piss, but I also think there is a positive about a parlour where girls have this freedom.
They're only there when they want to be, and that can be a good thing.

[lewisjones23]

I get how people get annoyed and accuse them of taking the piss, but I also think there is a positive about a parlour where girls have this freedom.
They're only there when they want to be, and that can be a good thing.

It is not a good thing for punters

It allows them to have no regard for those who travel and lets them piss them about

[TomTank]

It is not a good thing for punters

It allows them to have no regard for those who travel and lets them piss them about

yep, they should manage that side better - a girl who knows she has bookings should not let the punter down .... if I have a booking there now, I call before I set off to make sure the girl is in

[MerlinGray]

Cherry is reliable at Ladybirds, I'd guess if she's on she's going to show up.

[Blackpool Rock]

Yeah I tend to book after the start of their shift so they should already be there.

Brooke was always worth a punt but I lost count of the number of times she didn't show for her shift, probably more than she actually made it to work 
I see she was due to work yesterday but suddenly dropped off the rota at the last minute, wonder if she will make it on Saturday  My money is on No 

Brooke suddenly appeared on the rota for today too but has now been removed again, another no show I guess 
I've actually had this conversation with her and she laughed and said she really needs to make more of an effort to show up, WTF are these girls like 
I guess this is why many of them can't hold down a proper job type job 

[lewisjones23]

Brooke suddenly appeared on the rota for today too but has now been removed again, another no show I guess 
I've actually had this conversation with her and she laughed and said she really needs to make more of an effort to show up, WTF are these girls like 
I guess this is why many of them can't hold down a proper job type job 

They're like that because they are allowed to be like that.

How often did it happen at Sandys? hardly ever, if they were on the rota then you pretty much knew they'd be there.

I know its hard for a parlour to reach the same standards as what SS was, but its not hard to try and be a bit more professional

[Atlas1957]

I disagree and think you both have it a bit backwards in your thinking, they wouldn't work at SS as they couldn't handle the rigid shifts.

LMB provides a place for WGs to work who for whatever reason want very flexible start and end times to shifts. So flexible in fact they sometimes don't start their shift at all.

This increases the available pool of WGs working in Manchester parlours. This is why I like that all the parlours are different to each other, with different start times, end times, shift lengths, rules, leniency of rules, etc. It widens the kind of WG who can work in a parlour.

What isn't acceptable is unclear communication from LMB reception. If they say a WG is in the building and she isn't, then that is bad.

However, punters need to hold themselves accountable too. Don't book a flaky WG at the start of her shift, drive an hour to see her, then be upset when she no shows. Book her a few hours into her shift, call after her shift starts and ask "is she in the building as I don't want to travel if she isn't". I believe LMB has lied in the past in this situation, but I do wonder if punters are asking unclear questions, e.g. "is she working today" rather than "is she in the building" and then conflating the answers. Also, if you know the WG is flaky your questions should reflect that.

Also, some punters need to accept that some WGs are unsuitable for them because of their flakiness. There are other punters out there who can easily handle schedule changes, those WGs are suitable for them. So they still serve a purpose in the 'pool of WGs'. When saying this I am also specifically thinking of Phoebe's time at various parlours, who seems to attract a bunch of punters who ignore the crystal clear evidence that while she is a good WG (per reviews) she doesn't show to every shift she is put on website rotas for (also per reviews). I don't get why punters who are clearly time sensitive/poor or are upset by cancellations would try to book her. Read the reviews, plan accordingly.

[Blackpool Rock]

I disagree and think you both have it a bit backwards in your thinking, they wouldn't work at SS as they couldn't handle the rigid shifts.

LMB provides a place for WGs to work who for whatever reason want very flexible start and end times to shifts. So flexible in fact they sometimes don't start their shift at all.

This increases the available pool of WGs working in Manchester parlours. This is why I like that all the parlours are different to each other, with different start times, end times, shift lengths, rules, leniency of rules, etc. It widens the kind of WG who can work in a parlour.

What isn't acceptable is unclear communication from LMB reception. If they say a WG is in the building and she isn't, then that is bad.

However, punters need to hold themselves accountable too. Don't book a flaky WG at the start of her shift, drive an hour to see her, then be upset when she no shows. Book her a few hours into her shift, call after her shift starts and ask "is she in the building as I don't want to travel if she isn't". I believe LMB has lied in the past in this situation, but I do wonder if punters are asking unclear questions, e.g. "is she working today" rather than "is she in the building" and then conflating the answers. Also, if you know the WG is flaky your questions should reflect that.

Also, some punters need to accept that some WGs are unsuitable for them because of their flakiness. There are other punters out there who can easily handle schedule changes, those WGs are suitable for them. So they still serve a purpose in the 'pool of WGs'. When saying this I am also specifically thinking of Phoebe's time at various parlours, who seems to attract a bunch of punters who ignore the crystal clear evidence that while she is a good WG (per reviews) she doesn't show to every shift she is put on website rotas for (also per reviews). I don't get why punters who are clearly time sensitive/poor or are upset by cancellations would try to book her. Read the reviews, plan accordingly.

I actually agree with what you've posted, perhaps I didn't word my previous posts very well

[Blackpool Rock]

They're like that because they are allowed to be like that.

How often did it happen at Sandys? hardly ever, if they were on the rota then you pretty much knew they'd be there.

I know its hard for a parlour to reach the same standards as what SS was, but its not hard to try and be a bit more professional

If they no showed at SS without a good reason or did it too often they got the push.

I think more leeway was given to established girls with a good record but new girls who started to no show didn't last long, it was run more like an employer / employee type relationship

[lewisjones23]

I disagree and think you both have it a bit backwards in your thinking, they wouldn't work at SS as they couldn't handle the rigid shifts.

LMB provides a place for WGs to work who for whatever reason want very flexible start and end times to shifts. So flexible in fact they sometimes don't start their shift at all.

This increases the available pool of WGs working in Manchester parlours. This is why I like that all the parlours are different to each other, with different start times, end times, shift lengths, rules, leniency of rules, etc. It widens the kind of WG who can work in a parlour.

What isn't acceptable is unclear communication from LMB reception. If they say a WG is in the building and she isn't, then that is bad.

However, punters need to hold themselves accountable too. Don't book a flaky WG at the start of her shift, drive an hour to see her, then be upset when she no shows. Book her a few hours into her shift, call after her shift starts and ask "is she in the building as I don't want to travel if she isn't". I believe LMB has lied in the past in this situation, but I do wonder if punters are asking unclear questions, e.g. "is she working today" rather than "is she in the building" and then conflating the answers. Also, if you know the WG is flaky your questions should reflect that.

Also, some punters need to accept that some WGs are unsuitable for them because of their flakiness. There are other punters out there who can easily handle schedule changes, those WGs are suitable for them. So they still serve a purpose in the 'pool of WGs'. When saying this I am also specifically thinking of Phoebe's time at various parlours, who seems to attract a bunch of punters who ignore the crystal clear evidence that while she is a good WG (per reviews) she doesn't show to every shift she is put on website rotas for (also per reviews). I don't get why punters who are clearly time sensitive/poor or are upset by cancellations would try to book her. Read the reviews, plan accordingly.

some valid points in there

in reality they should just do away with the rota or post a warning on the website to say punters should call ahead to check

I have been in there personally when the receptionist has outright lied to someone on the phone and said a WG was working that day when she was over 2 hours late, obviously never to be seen that day in there.

that sort of behaviour is an absolute disgrace towards punters who ultimately pay their wages and bills. A little consideration for punter logistics would go a long way

out of interest, has anyone been lately? is it still a dump inside? their excuse used to be that it could be raided and shut down so they didnt want to spend money on it

[Blackpool Rock]

some valid points in there

in reality they should just do away with the rota or post a warning on the website to say punters should call ahead to check

I have been in there personally when the receptionist has outright lied to someone on the phone and said a WG was working that day when she was over 2 hours late, obviously never to be seen that day in there.

that sort of behaviour is an absolute disgrace towards punters who ultimately pay their wages and bills. A little consideration for punter logistics would go a long way

out of interest, has anyone been lately? is it still a dump inside? their excuse used to be that it could be raided and shut down so they didnt want to spend money on it

As I posted i've been caught out before so now tend to wait until a girl has started her shift before calling and booking, I did call to book someone years ago who regularly didn't turn up and in fairness they did say i couldn't book as they didn't know if she would turn in, I actually booked a slot to secure it on the basis i'd call an hour before hand to check she was in (She wasn't)
Having been let down after a 100 mile round trip I tend to have a plan B and hopefully C lined up, it's not just the distance but the wasted time 

I've been a few times this year, still the same inside 

[Southernbloke]

Repeatedly let down there by booking in advance, I’ve actually only had one booking there and that was when I just turned up ( negative reviewed) .
As others have said best to make sure that the person you want to see is actually on shift before going there.
Facilities were awful. Remember trying to jump around in the shower to try and get wet enough to wash in alternative scalding hot or absolutely freezing water!
I prefer the security of seeing a decent SP at Sheridans and you get a decent cup of tea there as well

[Rack Admirer]

out of interest, has anyone been lately? is it still a dump inside? their excuse used to be that it could be raided and shut down so they didnt want to spend money on it

It's not amazing but it's less of a dive than some of the other parlours still in existence. I'm glad it's still open.

On the no show front, one of the things about LM that is good is that GFE is literally just round the corner, providing a useful plan B. As mentioned above, ringing to check before setting off should be done regardless of the parlour and should even be done with independent girls.

The current LM line up doesn't appear as good as in the past but where is? I don't think there's a must see girl on the rota (maybe Cherry?) but at least it's open and gives us all an option.

[Bustydusty]

I’ve been there twice and both times was kept waiting 10-15 minute’s despite booking and ringing to confirm 30 minutes before hand - not a disaster but was blatantly lied to on one of these

[Atlas1957]

If I go to the barber or dentist or GP and wait 10 minutes past my appointment I don't get upset, so I don't see waiting 10 minutes at a parlour as an imposition even worth remembering (as long as they don't try to run off with 10 minutes of your time to fix the problem for the next punter). But, some punters do like to squeeze their punts into really tight windows and I can see that being an issue.

There are a lot of stories in these last few posts about the parlour/receptionist and I think that is where the blame should clearly lie rather than with the WGs, as the parlour/receptionist do have a lot of control with the messaging they give or could give.

I haven't been to LMB for a few months, but the facilities were mixed as usual that last few visits. Good clean sheets and towels, unrealiable showers, not enough heating in cold weather. I am not a huge fan of the parlour, I don't like the premium price for what doesn't feel like a very premium service. As a result I have visited 10+ WGs more often than I've visited LMB in total. I do have a long round trip almost as long a BRs for LMB and I do factor in the reliability of the reception. There are plenty of other similar round trip distance parlours I've been to 2 to 3 times more because they are better on reception (and slightly cheaper).

One other thing in relation to WGs and not showing for shifts that might apply to LMB, but definitely does at a few others, is that often the WG doesn't use the website (maybe they don't want that website on their phone at home). So I have had a WG who worked something like Tuesday/Thursday and they've told me they've told the parlour they aren't working Thursday next week. But next week rolls around, they are shown as working the Thursday until either getting pulled off the rota mid Thursday or sometimes they are left on the whole day. Probably causes a lot of phone calls where the impression given is the WG didn't show.

I also try to make a note of the quality of the specific receptionist and what days they work, as they can vary a lot in a lot of different customer service aspects including booking taking. Sometimes WGs know which are the good or bad receptionists they work with, but a few times when I've told a WG I prefer receptionist A to B, they actually say the opposite. So sometimes the WGs understand why they get more punters Tuesday compared to Thursday but sometimes they don't.

[TomTank]

I disagree and think you both have it a bit backwards in your thinking, they wouldn't work at SS as they couldn't handle the rigid shifts.

LMB provides a place for WGs to work who for whatever reason want very flexible start and end times to shifts. So flexible in fact they sometimes don't start their shift at all.

This increases the available pool of WGs working in Manchester parlours. This is why I like that all the parlours are different to each other, with different start times, end times, shift lengths, rules, leniency of rules, etc. It widens the kind of WG who can work in a parlour.

What isn't acceptable is unclear communication from LMB reception. If they say a WG is in the building and she isn't, then that is bad.

However, punters need to hold themselves accountable too. Don't book a flaky WG at the start of her shift, drive an hour to see her, then be upset when she no shows. Book her a few hours into her shift, call after her shift starts and ask "is she in the building as I don't want to travel if she isn't". I believe LMB has lied in the past in this situation, but I do wonder if punters are asking unclear questions, e.g. "is she working today" rather than "is she in the building" and then conflating the answers. Also, if you know the WG is flaky your questions should reflect that.

Also, some punters need to accept that some WGs are unsuitable for them because of their flakiness. There are other punters out there who can easily handle schedule changes, those WGs are suitable for them. So they still serve a purpose in the 'pool of WGs'. When saying this I am also specifically thinking of Phoebe's time at various parlours, who seems to attract a bunch of punters who ignore the crystal clear evidence that while she is a good WG (per reviews) she doesn't show to every shift she is put on website rotas for (also per reviews). I don't get why punters who are clearly time sensitive/poor or are upset by cancellations would try to book her. Read the reviews, plan accordingly.

Great post and spot on.

[MerlinGray]

If I go to the barber or dentist or GP and wait 10 minutes past my appointment I don't get upset, so I don't see waiting 10 minutes at a parlour as an imposition even worth remembering (as long as they don't try to run off with 10 minutes of your time to fix the problem for the next punter). But, some punters do like to squeeze their punts into really tight windows and I can see that being an issue.

There are a lot of stories in these last few posts about the parlour/receptionist and I think that is where the blame should clearly lie rather than with the WGs, as the parlour/receptionist do have a lot of control with the messaging they give or could give.

I haven't been to LMB for a few months, but the facilities were mixed as usual that last few visits. Good clean sheets and towels, unrealiable showers, not enough heating in cold weather. I am not a huge fan of the parlour, I don't like the premium price for what doesn't feel like a very premium service. As a result I have visited 10+ WGs more often than I've visited LMB in total. I do have a long round trip almost as long a BRs for LMB and I do factor in the reliability of the reception. There are plenty of other similar round trip distance parlours I've been to 2 to 3 times more because they are better on reception (and slightly cheaper).

One other thing in relation to WGs and not showing for shifts that might apply to LMB, but definitely does at a few others, is that often the WG doesn't use the website (maybe they don't want that website on their phone at home). So I have had a WG who worked something like Tuesday/Thursday and they've told me they've told the parlour they aren't working Thursday next week. But next week rolls around, they are shown as working the Thursday until either getting pulled off the rota mid Thursday or sometimes they are left on the whole day. Probably causes a lot of phone calls where the impression given is the WG didn't show.

I also try to make a note of the quality of the specific receptionist and what days they work, as they can vary a lot in a lot of different customer service aspects including booking taking. Sometimes WGs know which are the good or bad receptionists they work with, but a few times when I've told a WG I prefer receptionist A to B, they actually say the opposite. So sometimes the WGs understand why they get more punters Tuesday compared to Thursday but sometimes they don't.

On the money here Atlas

Sps very often need flexible work. We all do. Many of is have family commitments. How often do you at short notice have to get kids from school or clubs or whatever. You expect SPs to be different? Making Time to fuck us isn't they're only committnment

[MerlinGray]

Sorry for my poor spelling n shit bit you get my point

[cheshireknobb]

OLIVIA
External Link/Members Only
If you like curves
BOOBS
& I Bit of fluff on the pitch .. not full bush but nice retro pussy vibes