Author Topic: Lillian Sweet Girl: Too Good To Be True?  (Read 841 times)

Offline Tom Foolery

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I am a new user and have just 3 massages under my belt, one of which was a god awful B&S where I should have walked.

Now looking to step up to something more adventurous but well reviewed SPs in my area are few, but loads with non feedback.

Lillian is however very appealing but suspiciously so given she has no feedback.

Does anyone have experience or is her profile BS as I suspect?

Thanks and I hope this is an acceptable use of the site.

Online Bdk78

A review of your bad experience is invaluable here to stop others making the same mistake and saving their hard earned cash. Also makes other members more willing to help out with requests like this.  :thumbsup:

Offline Tom Foolery

Thank you. Unfortunately that was in November 2023 and I only joined this week and I have not seen the profile since, sorry.

Due to MS my outings will be infrequent but I intend to review especially as I can add a perspective on how an SP is able to cater for the less able. So don't expect 13 different positions in my reviews

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,056
  • Likes: 160
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
Thank you. Unfortunately that was in November 2023 and I only joined this week and I have not seen the profile since, sorry.

 So don't expect 13 different positions in my reviews

Tom - as a new member you can, during the first 6 months of your membership, review anyone you have seen in the past 12 months. Once you have been here 6 months, it reverts to 6 months - as it is for longer term members.

The fact that you can't identify the WG/SP is a separate issue and may make giving a review pointless - in fact a link is one of the requirements for a review. And you don't have to go into as much graphic details (eg positions) as some guys do.