Author Topic: xx BlondeLikesFun xx - Deposit Thief Cardiff  (Read 11856 times)

Offline Mil 34

Was the correct girl identified anyway?
Welsh Crystal appears to be the girl in these old reviews  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=16205
Unless anyone can connect that profile to this?

Crystal is what she calls herself

Offline brianamorgan

So have I got this right ? BLF never stole the OP’s deposit and I’m still not  sure what his motives were if this is true

What am i missing how has this review been discredited and how do we know this is john stoves?.

If their is evidence to prove this then that is unaceptable and should be banned but if its a case of the sp say so, then what is the point of this forum that when u post a negetive review all it takes is a word from the sp and your banned?.

If it is just the response from the sp then of course she is going to deny it, and why does a sp statement carry more weight than the punters on a punters forum??. But as ive said if their is credible evidence to prove this behaviour then that is total unaceptable.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2024, 09:35:43 pm by brianamorgan »

Offline Dan Dastardly

What am i missing how has this review been discredited and how do we know this is john stoves?.

If their is evidence to prove this then that is unaceptable and should be banned but if its a case of the sp say so, then what is the point of this forum that when u post a negetive review all it takes is a word from the sp and your banned?.

If it is just the response from the sp then of course she is going to deny it, and why does a sp statement carry more weight than the punters on a punters forum??. But as ive said if their is credible evidence to prove this behaviour then that is total unaceptable.
Yes this is what I found rather confusing

Offline Dan Dastardly

What am i missing how has this review been discredited and how do we know this is john stoves?.

If their is evidence to prove this then that is unaceptable and should be banned but if its a case of the sp say so, then what is the point of this forum that when u post a negetive review all it takes is a word from the sp and your banned?.

If it is just the response from the sp then of course she is going to deny it, and why does a sp statement carry more weight than the punters on a punters forum??. But as ive said if their is credible evidence to prove this behaviour then that is total unaceptable.
Yes this is what I found rather confusing

Offline justalad

Yes this is what I found rather confusing
Banned for threatening/ posting fake reviews in order for a booking and a positive review. Down to Admins to expand.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,939
  • Likes: 771
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Banned for threatening/ posting fake reviews in order for a booking and a positive review. Down to Admins to expand.
No it isn't, however what I will say is I have seen evidence that he offered to post a positive review and rebut the negative in exchange for a booking.

That is something we don't take lightly and don't act on without evidence.

Perhaps I could have worded the banning reason better and I will amend that.

« Last Edit: August 26, 2024, 11:48:04 pm by daviemac »

Offline justalad

No it isn't, however what I will say is I have seen evidence that he offered to post a positive review and rebut the negative in exchange for a booking.

That is something we don't take lightly and don't act on without evidence.

Perhaps I could have worded the banning reason better and I will amend that.
👍🏻

Offline LipLover

Just wondering - shouldn't the negative review be removed in this case?

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,711
  • Likes: 564
  •  
  • Reviews: 510
I’ve had issues trying to post reviews in the past but will try and do one in the next few days
What was the issue?

You couldn’t be arsed?

A member since 2016 with nothing to share.
You win this weeks star prize, the clock.

Offline justalad

Just wondering - shouldn't the negative review be removed in this case?
:thumbsup: