Miss Elegance - Bristol

[victor989]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


When    : July 2024


Where   : A main road in Stokes Croft, Bristol


Cost      : £120/30min


Comms  : Good. Answered my call straight away and agreed a time the next day. However she was cold and business like.


The meet

Summer is finally here and with all the totty walking about in summer dress, my punting juices are starting to flow.

Normally my maximum punting budget is £100/30min as I believe no fuck is worth more than that. However I found Miss Elegance's A/W
pictures stunning and was even getting a boner just looking at them. I therefore had no choice but to satisfy my urges and book her at £120.

The meet never took place. About 1 hour before the agreed time she fired several texts to me saying 'Where you from ?', 'Are you English ?'
and 'What your race ?'. This was all within 60 seconds. I found this impertinent. I have a mediterranean look and texted her saying I am  'British
with light tan'. She immediately cancelled the meet saying 'The Landlord is here fixing the hot water system'. I don't believe this. All this time her
A/W 'available today' green light was on.

What a timewaster, but at least I enacted my plan B and had a great punt with a Czech girl called Kendall at Diamonds massage parlour. She has
black hair, black eyes, dress size 10 with medium size tits. However she is covered in tattoos.   

[newhere456]

Most photoshopped images I've seen for a while,  I expect you'd have been bitterly disapointed.

[GoodLookinGuy]

Would be interested in reading a review on Kendall

[victor989]

Most photoshopped images I've seen for a while,  I expect you'd have been bitterly disapointed.

When I first saw her A/W pictures last year, my first thought was also they are photoshopped. However punter Simping
posted a favourable review of her and this is why I decided to punt her.

Here's the link to the review  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=389262.0

[victor989]

Would be interested in reading a review on Kendall

I would like to post a separate review of Kendall, but I am barred by Diamonds from posting reviews of their WG's.
This is because of a nasty incident that happened to me at Diamonds a few years ago. I had posted a review (positive)
of one of their WG's called Paris, who read it and took offence and had me banned. I then, did not go back there for a long
time, but last summer decided to go back and see what would happen. I was recognised immediately but we agreed I
could come back as long as I didn't post any more reviews of them.

[Jameson20]

I would like to post a separate review of Kendall, but I am barred by Diamonds from posting reviews of their WG's.
This is because of a nasty incident that happened to me at Diamonds a few years ago. I had posted a review (positive)
of one of their WG's called Paris, who read it and took offence and had me banned. I then, did not go back there for a long
time, but last summer decided to go back and see what would happen. I was recognised immediately but we agreed I
could come back as long as I didn't post any more reviews of them.

I don't understand their thinking on this at all. Presumably, they don't want punters posting negative reviews of girls who work there, but to not want any? And to "allow" you back on the condition that you don't post reviews on here? I'd be tempted to say fuck 'em.

[daviemac]

I would like to post a separate review of Kendall, but I am barred by Diamonds from posting reviews of their WG's.
This is because of a nasty incident that happened to me at Diamonds a few years ago. I had posted a review (positive)
of one of their WG's called Paris, who read it and took offence and had me banned. I then, did not go back there for a long
time, but last summer decided to go back and see what would happen. I was recognised immediately but we agreed I
could come back as long as I didn't post any more reviews of them.

How do they know your name on here or that you are even a member? It's because of this sort of thing that we keep saying keep your membership of this site to yourself.

It's been 3 years since you posted a review of one of their SPs and to be honest letting some pimp tell you you can't post reviews goes against the ethos of the site.

[ForkEscort]

I doubt any UKP member is broadcasting their membership of this site in any way so I would imagine that the establishment would have known, or at least thought that they were able to connect enough dots with a reasonable degree of accuracy, for the same reason that I've been contacted privately about reviews in the past.

I think we all appreciate reviews that are somewhat proximal to the date that any meeting took place and I think we also appreciate a good level of detail in those reviews (at least I know that I do), however, the downside to this, imo, is that with a good level of detail and a small amount of time between meeting and review posting it's probably often possible for SPs to deduce who a UKP user is based on the content of their review. 
I suspect that it is more common than we think and that it seems quite rare as the number of reported instances of the occasions where the real-life punter is connected with their UKP review and the reviewed SP reaches out to the punter in some way is rather low I think - I feel like deducing this connection is particularly easy if the SP happens to be having a quiet day in the office which I believe is the reason it has happened to me.

For context, I have had one SP contact me about a negative review in the past and a couple contact me to thank me for a positive.  As far as I can tell (through conversation and area of the punt) they all had fairly quiet stays at their various locations.

That said, none of them ever asked me to post, not post, or amend any reviews, and had they asked I would have declined.  This brothel/parlour or whatever it is attempting to censor their customers is dodgy as fuck imo and is reason enough for me not to visit.  Like... what are you hiding by not wanting reviews put out there?

[daviemac]

I doubt any UKP member is broadcasting their membership of this site in any way so I would imagine that the establishment would have known, or at least thought that they were able to connect enough dots with a reasonable degree of accuracy, for the same reason that I've been contacted privately about reviews in the past.

I think we all appreciate reviews that are somewhat proximal to the date that any meeting took place and I think we also appreciate a good level of detail in those reviews (at least I know that I do), however, the downside to this, imo, is that with a good level of detail and a small amount of time between meeting and review posting it's probably often possible for SPs to deduce who a UKP user is based on the content of their review. 
I suspect that it is more common than we think and that it seems quite rare as the number of reported instances of the occasions where the real-life punter is connected with their UKP review and the reviewed SP reaches out to the punter in some way is rather low I think - I feel like deducing this connection is particularly easy if the SP happens to be having a quiet day in the office which I believe is the reason it has happened to me.

For context, I have had one SP contact me about a negative review in the past and a couple contact me to thank me for a positive.  As far as I can tell (through conversation and area of the punt) they all had fairly quiet stays at their various locations.

That said, none of them ever asked me to post, not post, or amend any reviews, and had they asked I would have declined.  This brothel/parlour or whatever it is attempting to censor their customers is dodgy as fuck imo and is reason enough for me not to visit.  Like... what are you hiding by not wanting reviews put out there?

You'd be surprised mate, we've banned loads for trying to use it to gain favours, then there's the one's who show reviews from here to and discuss them with SPs

We recommend never mention UKP, if UKP is mentioned deny all knowledge, leave a reasonable time between the punt and posting the review, (it can be up to 6 months) don't give dates or times in the review, keep them to a factual account of what services were provided and how they were delivered.

[victor989]

I don't understand their thinking on this at all. Presumably, they don't want punters posting negative reviews of girls who work there, but to not want any? And to "allow" you back on the condition that you don't post reviews on here? I'd be tempted to say fuck 'em.

I don't get their thinking either. My thinking is that they should be happy with a positive review, but with a negative
one, I don't care as I wouldn't see them again.

The only logical explanation for Diamonds stance I think is this. Paris was a stunning WG and a great cash cow for them.
A much bigger cash cow than me. They were afraid of losing her and tried to appease her by banning me.
 

[victor989]

How do they know your name on here or that you are even a member? It's because of this sort of thing that we keep saying keep your membership of this site to yourself.

It's been 3 years since you posted a review of one of their SPs and to be honest letting some pimp tell you you can't post reviews goes against the ethos of the site.

I had posted the review a few hours after the meet whilst the punt was still fresh in my mind. I also used the same name
Victor. This is how she must have found out and linked me to the review. At the time I had assumed that WG's in massage
parlours, don't read reviews. In this case she did. I would never disclose to a WG that I am a member on UKP. This seems
just common sense to me.

I can understand the ethos of this site. Barring me from posting is against my ethos too. This is why I have continued to post
little, mini-reviews of Diamonds very discretely, disguised and embedded within my other reviews where they won't be read
by them.

Punter Goodlookguy is interested in a review of Kendall. I have already described it briefly but will do a mini-review on 'this'
post (not a separate review) shortly.

[victor989]

I doubt any UKP member is broadcasting their membership of this site in any way so I would imagine that the establishment would have known, or at least thought that they were able to connect enough dots with a reasonable degree of accuracy, for the same reason that I've been contacted privately about reviews in the past.

I think we all appreciate reviews that are somewhat proximal to the date that any meeting took place and I think we also appreciate a good level of detail in those reviews (at least I know that I do), however, the downside to this, imo, is that with a good level of detail and a small amount of time between meeting and review posting it's probably often possible for SPs to deduce who a UKP user is based on the content of their review. 
I suspect that it is more common than we think and that it seems quite rare as the number of reported instances of the occasions where the real-life punter is connected with their UKP review and the reviewed SP reaches out to the punter in some way is rather low I think - I feel like deducing this connection is particularly easy if the SP happens to be having a quiet day in the office which I believe is the reason it has happened to me.

For context, I have had one SP contact me about a negative review in the past and a couple contact me to thank me for a positive.  As far as I can tell (through conversation and area of the punt) they all had fairly quiet stays at their various locations.

That said, none of them ever asked me to post, not post, or amend any reviews, and had they asked I would have declined.  This brothel/parlour or whatever it is attempting to censor their customers is dodgy as fuck imo and is reason enough for me not to visit.  Like... what are you hiding by not wanting reviews put out there?

Thanks for your input Forkescort. It's comforting to know that it's not just happened to me. In my case it developed into
a nasty incident at Diamonds all those years ago.

[victor989]

Would be interested in reading a review on Kendall

As promised, here is a review of Kendal at Diamonds massage parlour. It is not a separate review for the
reasons stated above.

It is a solid positive review and the cost was £80/45min, although I was done in 30min. It was a walk-in and
there were 3 other WG's available. They were Natasha and Maria but both were overweight. There was also Laura
but I couldn't get a good enough look at her but she looked stocky. Kendal was the best looking of the bunch.

Kendal is a Czech girl from Prague and looked in her late 20's. She had black hair, black eyes and a good figure
about dress size 10. Facially she is OK and has medium sized tits. She was friendly and I got the impression she
would be up for anything. The only downside for me is that she is covered in tattoos and her nipples are pierced
with little metal rods, which I'm not a fan off.

The action started with me massaging her firmly and sliding my cock up and down her pert bum giving me a stiffy.
Whilst she lay helplessly underneath me I took the opportunity to finger her, going deep inside which she enjoyed.
She began gyrating and became very moist. She then gave me a BJ which was excellent playing with my balls and
giving good suck. I could feel the sap starting to rise so I changed position to missionary to last longer. However, she
had the tightest pussy I have experienced in a few years causing me to shoot my load within a minute. I would also
add that she used no lube and payment for the punt was only taken afterwards, both of which I like.

So overall a great punt (apart from the tattoos and piercings) and I would certainly see her again. 

[victor989]

 
This is an update on the review of Miss Elegance.

She texted me last week apologising for the cancellation and was very eager for me to book her again very
soon. I now reckon this because business is slack for her. We eventually agreed to book 30min of GFE which happened
today. The location was a ground floor flat and the bedroom (the magic room as she called it) had good natural
light. The punt itself was a disappointment.

It is definitely the WG in the A/W pictures but much stockier with weight gain around the stomach, bum and thighs.
I'd say she is dress size 12 not 10 and age around 45 years but facially still attractive. She eagerly took my cash and
stashed it. Her overall tone throughout was business like and borderline bossy. She didn't even like the bed pillows
being moved.

Despite agreeing to GFE several times by text, she refused any kissing during the punt. She never once asked me what
I like. She has a set routine that she sticks to whatever is agreed. This is first to give a massage (a crappy one) with tons
of baby oil. This is followed by covered oral which was OK but not outstanding. We then fucked in missionary with her calling
me a 'Strong man' and then asking me 'Have you cum yet ?' . I replied 'Not yet'. Then onto cowgirl position and again calling
me a 'Strong man' followed by 'Have you cum yet ?'. This time I eventually did cum

I considered posting another review with a low neutral review as I was very underwhelmed by her service but have opted for another
negative as she misled me about GFE which I had confirmed with her several times. Basically this is a double negative review.
What a waste of £120. I have had much better punts recently at Diamonds and Bath Road Massage Parlours for only £80.

[victor989]

 
In less than 1 week from the day of my punt with Miss Elegance, she has dropped her prices and
is now offering a 15 minute quickie (not so elegant now are we). I reckon her business is slack
and hope my review has contributed to that.

[farmerboy70]

Shame she on my hot list