External Link/Members OnlyI have had Kelly on my radar for quite some time but only just recently got round to seeing her. Her profile appears in Cambridge from time to time. I think she tours with another girl who appears at the same time. Believe it or not, I called Kelly because my girlfriend had arranged a threesome that ultimately fell through. So Kelly was my backup option.
I'll try to be clear as I can here without rambling. I'm pretty sure Kelly has recently updated her profile pics, as I recall being originally drawn to much better photos on her profile than the ones she uses right now. I toyed with all three ratings for this meeting, but I've plumped for a neutral. Although the meeting was enjoyable and Kelly is very pleasant, friendly and enthuiastic, the more I look at her photos, the more I get riled that they just aren't an accurate representation. I realise that most if not all girls take pics from clever angles or even use filters and photoshop, but I'm getting a bit tired with this side of the game. It makes you want to stick to the ladies that you've tried and tested before, which is not great for expanding your horizons. I paid 130 for the hour.
I had no bother getting through and she was available to meet relatively swiftly. The venue was at the busy end of Arbury Road. There was no parking outside the venue, but I drove up the road for a short distance and found plenty of free parking further along, giving me a 3 minute walk back to her place. She asked me to call her when I was outside on the street. I get the feeling she did that to vet me. (I have an unintentionally intimidating look about me
, and I have turned up to meets on a couple of occasions, been told to call from outside and then told that they've changed their mind.)
Up in the flat, the place was an air bnb so it was fine. En suite in the room. I'm sure that Kelly is the lady in the photos, but she is what posh people (i.e. not me of course
) call 'rubenesque'. Kelly was larger than I expected. She has folds on her back, for example, and none of her photos convey that. But I was up for it and did not find enough amiss to back out. Facially she is plain, say 5/10. Someone has mentioned in a previous review that she is clammy. I think she uses some sort of cream or lotion over her body. It was a bit odd but not a deal breaker for me.
She was keen on DFK and did it well, which is a definite plus for me. Then she moved on to BJ, which was fairly good, with a little bit of eye contact. I think she may have even deep throated the little fella at one point, though my memory is sketchy. I went down on her, which she seemed to enjoy and I did too. All clean and fresh, though I was the first punter of the day, so no excuses there. She was pefectly amenable to changing positions and doing whatever I wanted. I eventually came while taking her doggy style, and found myself maybe halfway in to the hour. We chatted for a short time and then to her credit she didn't rest on her laurels, despite my usual difficulties with round two too soon after round one. She offered a massage, which I accepted. It was fairly good, and she was writhing over me and managed to stir the old boy into life again. But at this point whatever the libido's equivalent to beer goggles had disappeared, and I realised I wouldn't be able to cum again while shagging her, so I opted for her giving me a handjob to finish instead.
So the positives were the price, her friendliness/enthusiam and skills at getting me hard for round two. On the downside, she just doesn't do it for me, and the photos are just not an accurate portrayal. I won't be going back, unless it's to see her flatmate.
Topic: Kelly 007, Cambridge (Read 2819 times)