Author Topic: Miss 69 Ella - Bayswater  (Read 1510 times)

Offline Simonkey

External Link/Members Only

Last week

1hr - £150

LFK, OWO, missionary, doggy.

I saw the positive reviews on here and the pics and thought, why not? First time with Miss69, usually use Olina.

Booking was straight forward. Punt was totally so so. I wish I'd stuck with my usual Olina girls tbh.

Flat was a grotty, mouldy basement bedsit. She opened the door not dressed as requested. She is facially pretty, but the photoshop definitely hides a plumpness to her face. Her body is definitely on the buxom side - not what I expected at all. 

I felt similar to how I felt with Apple from Olina (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=3954019) - the pics are waaaay too different to the person IRL, but Ella didn't have the sexually engaging personally that made Apple a positive.

She's new to being an escort so needs instructions on positions etc. Very much no kissing on offer and I was taken aback by her no CIM policy on the second pop (due to being new and not liking the taste) so had to finish in the bag twice. Chatting was fine, massage was fine but she's very much not enthusiastic about the sexual interaction.

After some time from the punt, I realised that it was her facial prettyness that got me over the line tbh. Not her vibe or body or skills.

Definitely wouldn't return. She was nice enough as a person but this is a neutral bordering on negative.

YMMV and she's here for another week or so. But the more I think about it, the more I should have gone elsewhere.

Any advice on if it's worth exploring other Miss69 girls or are they all as misleading as this was?

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 05:56:43 pm by Simonkey »

Offline anonymouse72

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 06:39:18 pm by anonymouse72 »

Offline Simonkey


Offline SoapyTW

Any advice on if it's worth exploring other Miss69 girls or are they all as misleading as this was?

I found Alice @ Miss69 and Fallyn @ Olina very misleading and disappointing vs their agency photos.
Mata @ Olina looks a bit different to the photos also, but is still pretty.
Nana @ Miss69 looks very similar to photos / possibly better than photos in real life

Edit: obviously this is personal opinion. I'm sure many will disagree with me, particularly about Fallyn  :lol:
« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 07:46:32 pm by SoapyTW »

Offline Greendoc

I found Alice @ Miss69 and Fallyn @ Olina very misleading and disappointing vs their agency photos.
Mata @ Olina looks a bit different to the photos also, but is still pretty.
Nana @ Miss69 looks very similar to photos / possibly better than photos in real life

Edit: obviously this is personal opinion. I'm sure many will disagree with me, particularly about Fallyn  :lol:

When you live in a world of filters and don’t expect them to be used is amusing..

Offline SoapyTW

When you live in a world of filters and don’t expect them to be used is amusing..

Of course I expect filters to be used. But there a huge difference between low level blemish filtering vs the excessive and professional photoshopping / photos that are years out of date. I found Alice and Fallyn to look slender and enticing on the photos... but dumpy and disappointing in real life. That's not 'filtering'... that's fraud :)