MissRedLipsChloe - Cheetham Hill

[Kobayashi]

LINK External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I saw Chloe. twice

COMMS couple of messages on AW then all text. Response was a little slow to my first text. But then we got everything organised quickly.
The first meeting she flaked.
Im sat in a car in the pouring rain in cheetham hill on a sat night thinking what the eff am i doing here. After waiting 5 mins to my "whats your address, im in the area" to no reply. I just went home. Kind of a blessing in disguise, because i just switched up my diet and was moving from cant poop to cant stop pooping ...but my intestinal issues aside, not a good start.

She did text the next morning and said she fell asleep - noted no apology though.
So arranged to meet again - but got the full addy this time

LOCATION  main road in cheetham hill, loads of parking. discreet block of flats. Buzzed up. Told to wait 5 mins - what is this 5 mins thing? Is it cos i turn up 5 mins early? I always turn up early for appointments, so maybe thats it?
MEETING This girl has a unique look, tall, 5'11" pushing over 6 feet in heels. She seemed a little quiet, but i can yammer away pretty much anywhere to pretty much anyone. I undress her slowly, and start massaging her all over - i always like to be in control of her pleasure. She opens her legs and lifts her hips up to pull my hand closer to her pussy - she shows me exactly how she likes to be fingered. I kiss and lick her all over. She (again) shows me exactly how to RO, thats me pretty much set I'm happy to go to town on her puss.

She sits up to blow me  - shes v confident about her oral skills - again ive never gotten much from this - but it's OWO which always feels nice, but meh.
We fuck missionary and doggy - but again cant cum from sex.
I think about wanking on her tits, but - this may sound strange -  sometimes, if i dont cum, i get this huge surge of energy - and i kinda dont wanna lose that drive by firing off a quick load.

The second meeting was similar, but i couldn't stay hard, just not into this chic.
We had zero rapport and shes not my type.
But i just love how responsive to RO she is still not got my mojo back!

[daviemac]

You can't review 2 SPs in one review.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

[Kobayashi]

You can't review 2 SPs in one review.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

Hi, sorry if I've misunderstood.
I've posted three separate reviews for three separate girls.
Each post mentions the two encounters I've had with each girl.
In this post I mentioned one of the other girls, but only one girl (the one who's link is at the top) is the subject of the review.

Have I got this right or am I missing something?

[daviemac]

So review two - I saw _Vivien_ first then Chloe.]

then at the end you mention first girl and second girl, to me Vivien is the first girl and Cloe is the second, 2 girls 1 review?

If this is a review for one girl why are you mentioning two. 

If this is in fact a review of 1 girl I'll put it back but to save any complications just talk about the one you are reviewing.

I've edited the mentions of a second girl out so people can understand this is a review of 2 bookings with Chloe.

[Sweetadam786]

What is this review? 🤣🤣🤣

[chrishornx]

What is this review? 🤣🤣🤣

about chloe I think but seems he had zero rapport and couldn't get hard so have to ask why he went back. Can't see a mention of vivien I must be missing something

[RandomGuy99]

about chloe I think but seems he had zero rapport and couldn't get hard so have to ask why he went back. Can't see a mention of vivien I must be missing something

He's done a number of separate reviews one for Chloe and one for Vivien. I think his end statement (which I think daviemac has now removed so it's a review on a single SP as per the rules) isn't really relevant to the review it's just saying he did 2 bookings and had different outcomes and he's off to more. SPs are all different and will act in different ways.  I think some of his different experiences could probably be addressed by better expectation setting. It appears he likes rough sex, so he needs to find an escort who is happy to accept rough sex. If he explained what he wanted to the SPs before he booked they might explain that they don't do rough sex and he can then find another SP who does. Probably SPs who provide Porn Star Experience (PSE) would be better suited to deliver what he wants.

[chrishornx]

He's done a number of separate reviews one for Chloe and one for Vivien. I think his end statement (which I think daviemac has now removed so it's a review on a single SP as per the rules) isn't really relevant to the review it's just saying he did 2 bookings and had different outcomes and he's off to more. SPs are all different and will act in different ways.  I think some of his different experiences could probably be addressed by better expectation setting. It appears he likes rough sex, so he needs to find an escort who is happy to accept rough sex. If he explained what he wanted to the SPs before he booked they might explain that they don't do rough sex and he can then find another SP who does. Probably SPs who provide Porn Star Experience (PSE) would be better suited to deliver what he wants.

ah that explains it cheers I was not aware an end statement was removed but that explains it

his reviews are  a little bit difficult to follow and don't always provide all the right info

[daviemac]

ah that explains it cheers I was not aware an end statement was removed but that explains it

then at the end you mention first girl and second girl, to me Vivien is the first girl and Cloe is the second, 2 girls 1 review?

If this is a review for one girl why are you mentioning two. 

If this is in fact a review of 1 girl I'll put it back but to save any complications just talk about the one you are reviewing.

I've edited the mentions of a second girl out so people can understand this is a review of 2 bookings with Chloe.