Author Topic: AdultWork verification photos (London) (Read 560041 times)

JayEZ2K · « **Reply #4950 on:** March 23, 2021, 10:33:13 pm »

Quote from: magnetico on March 23, 2021, 08:49:52 pm

Interesting, didn't know that.

That's a shame, and a loss for indexing. I suppose it's a move to improve our relations with WGs who might not want veripics posted.

magnetico · « **Reply #4951 on:** March 24, 2021, 09:43:41 am »

Quote from: JayEZ2K on March 23, 2021, 10:33:13 pm

who might not want veripics posted.

Unlikely, or we would have to also remove negative reviews

JayEZ2K · « **Reply #4952 on:** March 25, 2021, 05:29:12 am »

Quote from: magnetico on March 24, 2021, 09:43:41 am

Unlikely, or we would have to also remove negative reviews

Good point. It seems the AW functionality has changed as well, so this could be an industry-wide change. Whatever the reason, I'm betting it's done in our favour.

nohey1 · « **Reply #4953 on:** March 31, 2021, 01:15:15 pm »

Quote from: myothernameis on March 23, 2021, 01:09:32 am

Rule 29, verification photos are no longer allowed on ukp

That is genuinely an insane rule. The point of this forum is for us punters to be safe and know what we're getting into. Verification photos are a massive safety net when deciding to see a girl.

Fuzzyduck · « **Reply #4954 on:** March 31, 2021, 01:26:42 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 01:15:15 pm

That is genuinely an insane rule. The point of this forum is for us punters to be safe and know what we're getting into. Verification photos are a massive safety net when deciding to see a girl.

Have you actually given any thought to why? If you think it's bollocks you should tell management they've got it wrong.

RAJEC · « **Reply #4955 on:** March 31, 2021, 01:30:43 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 01:15:15 pm

That is genuinely an insane rule. The point of this forum is for us punters to be safe and know what we're getting into. Verification photos are a massive safety net when deciding to see a girl.

Fully agree with this.

BUT

As a forum it also helps to have regular reviews. 4 in 5 years of membership doesn’t really do that does it???

nohey1 · « **Reply #4956 on:** March 31, 2021, 01:52:38 pm »

Quote from: RAJEC on March 31, 2021, 01:30:43 pm

Fully agree with this.

BUT

As a forum it also helps to have regular reviews. 4 in 5 years of membership doesn’t really do that does it???

Wow what a skillful pivot onto the usual pointless trope insult of lack of reviews. If i've not seen more than 4 WGs how can i write reviews? Please save yourself the embarrassment of making stupid comments in the future.

finn5555 · « **Reply #4957 on:** March 31, 2021, 02:06:46 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 01:15:15 pm

That is genuinely an insane rule. The point of this forum is for us punters to be safe and know what we're getting into. Verification photos are a massive safety net when deciding to see a girl.

Follow the rules of fuck off simple really

nohey1 · « **Reply #4958 on:** March 31, 2021, 02:16:52 pm »

Quote from: finn5555 on March 31, 2021, 02:06:46 pm

Follow the rules of fuck off simple really

I only just understood what you meant with your awful grammar. So in response: I never said i wasn't going to follow them. I said it was insane. Totally different.

The UKpunting Dickhead Detachment is out in force today, i see. Jesus.

finn5555 · « **Reply #4959 on:** March 31, 2021, 03:01:10 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 02:16:52 pm

I only just understood what you meant with your awful grammar.

Before you become the grammar policeman of UKP go back to school 🤦🏻‍♂️

nohey1 · « **Reply #4960 on:** March 31, 2021, 03:08:36 pm »

Quote from: finn5555 on March 31, 2021, 03:01:10 pm

Before you become the grammar policeman of UKP go back to school 🤦🏻‍♂️

That is literally the worst comeback I've ever seen, buddy. Sorry. Looking back at your posts, you're a bit of an instigator and i don't have time for all that, so you keep arguing by yourself mate. Crack on.

RAJEC · « **Reply #4961 on:** March 31, 2021, 04:35:44 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 01:52:38 pm

Wow what a skillful pivot onto the usual pointless trope insult of lack of reviews. If i've not seen more than 4 WGs how can i write reviews? Please save yourself the embarrassment of making stupid comments in the future.

You seem to ask for more than you give on here.

No need to be pompous twat. If you don’t like the rules but you say you’re going to follow them, perhaps just shut the fuck it and do that

nohey1 · « **Reply #4962 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:04:56 pm »

Quote from: RAJEC on March 31, 2021, 04:35:44 pm

You seem to ask for more than you give on here.

No need to be pompous twat. If you don’t like the rules but you say you’re going to follow them, perhaps just shut the fuck it and do that

Irony at it's best. Weird how you agree with the rule I point out and yet are starting shit purely on my review rate which is equal to who i've seen. Maybe you should be the one fucking off, son.

myothernameis · « **Reply #4963 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:43:29 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 05:04:56 pm

Irony at it's best. Weird how you agree with the rule I point out and yet are starting shit purely on my review rate which is equal to who i've seen. Maybe you should be the one fucking off, son.

You need to calm down, as eventuality someone will get them self's banned

nohey1 · « **Reply #4964 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:45:20 pm »

Quote from: myothernameis on March 31, 2021, 05:43:29 pm

You need to calm down, as eventuality someone will get them self's banned

I'm giving as good as i get. If i get banned for that so be it.

Kev40ish · « **Reply #4965 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:49:13 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 01:15:15 pm

That is genuinely an insane rule. The point of this forum is for us punters to be safe and know what we're getting into. Verification photos are a massive safety net when deciding to see a girl.

Like others have told you it’s the new rules..
You may think it’s insane, but it’s not your site to decide what is allowed

You just enjoy the benefits

nohey1 · « **Reply #4966 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:50:46 pm »

Kev you're absolutely right. That's why I'm going to abide by them.

Private Parts · « **Reply #4967 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:51:47 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 05:45:20 pm

I'm giving as good as i get. If i get banned for that so be it.

‘Fraid not nohey1. Do not pretend to lecture those about grammar when you omit single person present ‘I’

nohey1 · « **Reply #4968 on:** March 31, 2021, 05:58:51 pm »

I was happy to leave it at my opinion. I didn't start the slanging match.

Private Parts · « **Reply #4969 on:** March 31, 2021, 06:04:37 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 05:58:51 pm

I was happy to leave it at my opinion. I didn't start the slanging match.

Of course you were. But then you know better.
Best left methinks

finn5555 · « **Reply #4970 on:** March 31, 2021, 07:44:50 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 03:08:36 pm

That is literally the worst comeback I've ever seen, buddy. Sorry. Looking back at your posts, you're a bit of an instigator and i don't have time for all that, so you keep arguing by yourself mate. Crack on.

You’re very aggressive for a new boy 🤷🏻 Maybe you need to sit down relax and take on board what people say

Slinky · « **Reply #4971 on:** March 31, 2021, 10:25:58 pm »

Quote from: myothernameis on March 23, 2021, 01:09:32 am

Rule 29, verification photos are no longer allowed on ukp

oh wow thanks for that, I hadn't seen that change, fortunately the change in AW profile configurations has been hiding them for new accounts now or i might have fallen fowl of that rule, as I thought these threads were a really good idea when i saw them.

RAJEC · « **Reply #4972 on:** March 31, 2021, 11:06:10 pm »

Quote from: nohey1 on March 31, 2021, 05:04:56 pm

Irony at it's best. Weird how you agree with the rule I point out and yet are starting shit purely on my review rate which is equal to who i've seen. Maybe you should be the one fucking off, son.

Listen to the advice others are giving you... you’ve been here long enough to know how this place works.

Fuzzyduck · « **Reply #4973 on:** April 01, 2021, 08:49:46 pm »

Quote from: RAJEC on March 31, 2021, 11:06:10 pm

Listen to the advice others are giving you... you’ve been here long enough to know how this place works.

I'm not sure why the prick is even interested in veri pics. It's not as if he uses them for his punting.

RAJEC · « **Reply #4974 on:** April 02, 2021, 10:03:44 am »

Quote from: Fuzzyduck on April 01, 2021, 08:49:46 pm

I'm not sure why the prick is even interested in veri pics. It's not as if he uses them for his punting.

+1

sunnyj · « **Reply #4975 on:** April 02, 2021, 12:59:59 pm »

Now we can't post verification photos, it should be ok to post profile links which contains verification picture in gallery or profile pictures. Like this one
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
This WG looks to be pimped out and not sure how long this profile will last.

myothernameis · « **Reply #4976 on:** April 02, 2021, 01:30:59 pm »

Quote from: sunnyj on April 02, 2021, 12:59:59 pm

Now we can't post verification photos, it should be ok to post profile links which contains verification picture in gallery or profile pictures. Like this one

I would say no, no verification photos, and no re-posting of verification photos, so would say posting a link to a verification photo, is just the same as post the photo here

Xtro · « **Reply #4977 on:** April 02, 2021, 01:52:23 pm »

Quote from: myothernameis on April 02, 2021, 01:30:59 pm

I would say no, no verification photos, and no re-posting of verification photos, so would say posting a link to a verification photo, is just the same as post the photo here

In which case a review cannot be done on the SP if she uses a veripic as one of the main pics on her profile.

myothernameis · « **Reply #4978 on:** April 02, 2021, 01:58:38 pm »

Quote from: Xtro on April 02, 2021, 01:52:23 pm

In which case a review cannot be done on the SP if she uses a veripic as one of the main pics on her profile.

I would say, that isn't the case, so if someone has found a verification photo, and posts a link, to the profile, then thats just the same as posting the photo here

If someone is posting a review, and the AW profile has a verification photo, you not posting a link to the verification photo, but rather to the profile

daviemac · « **Reply #4979 on:** April 02, 2021, 03:43:43 pm »

Quote from: sunnyj on April 02, 2021, 12:59:59 pm

Now we can't post verification photos, it should be ok to post profile links which contains verification picture in gallery or profile pictures. Like this one
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
This WG looks to be pimped out and not sure how long this profile will last.

If a review was posted for this SP, though why anyone would want to see a barebacker is beyond me, then her profile pictures would show at the top on the page.

If she or the pimp want to publicise the verification pic as one of the profile pics then that would be outwith the rules here.

Rule #29 is do not post verification pictures that have been inadvertently left on show or pictures from private galleries. Previous posts that include such photos should not be linked to in a new post.

This is in addition to rule #22 which covers the likes of private photos or those from from social media.

As a basic rule of thumb, if there's any doubt it might be against the rules don't do it or ask.

A Decent Fist · « **Reply #4980 on:** April 02, 2021, 06:34:14 pm »

Quote from: daviemac on April 02, 2021, 03:43:43 pm

If she or the pimp want to publicise the verification pic as one of the profile pics then that would be outwith the rules here.

There was a discussion only today on a professional forum I belong to about whether the word "outwith" is used outside Scotland. Can't link to that, but I did find this:

External Link/Members Only

deantannn · « **Reply #4981 on:** April 03, 2021, 12:00:41 pm »

It a shame that the new rule prevents us posting those photos here as I found this thread super useful as many times someone I think of going for, i check and find them to be super ugly here in this thread and on the other hand, this was the thread which make me started going to the korean pimp in east london too.

I assume the rule is to protect this site from being attacked by haters of this site so I can understand that this is just a small sacrifice to protect the overall forum but still sad.

PatMacGroin · « **Reply #4982 on:** April 03, 2021, 01:09:13 pm »

Quote from: daviemac on April 02, 2021, 03:43:43 pm

If a review was posted for this SP, though why anyone would want to see a barebacker is beyond me, then her profile pictures would show at the top on the page.

If she or the pimp want to publicise the verification pic as one of the profile pics then that would be outwith the rules here.

Rule #29 is do not post verification pictures that have been inadvertently left on show or pictures from private galleries. Previous posts that include such photos should not be linked to in a new post.

This is in addition to rule #22 which covers the likes of private photos or those from from social media.

As a basic rule of thumb, if there's any doubt it might be against the rules don't do it or ask.

When and Why was rule 29 added to the rule book?

When I go back through my posting history I have noticed quite alot of photo's that have been deleted. All of them were photo's which had been openly shared on AW when I saved copies of them. Some of them may have been moved into the private galleries now, but at the time I saved them they were openly available within the public domain.

If this rule has been added due to a perceived legal obligation has there been some sort of change to the law? The legal position has been discussed multiple times in the past. Here's one example I contributed to, but there are many other examples:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=260592.msg2661512#msg2661512

daviemac · « **Reply #4983 on:** April 03, 2021, 02:26:18 pm »

Quote from: PatMacGroin on April 03, 2021, 01:09:13 pm

When and Why was rule 29 added to the rule book?

When I go back through my posting history I have noticed quite alot of photo's that have been deleted. All of them were photo's which had been openly shared on AW when I saved copies of them. Some of them may have been moved into the private galleries now, but at the time I saved them they were openly available within the public domain.

If this rule has been added due to a perceived legal obligation has there been some sort of change to the law? The legal position has been discussed multiple times in the past. Here's one example I contributed to, but there are many other examples:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=260592.msg2661512#msg2661512

I have passed your query on to Head1, he is the one who as site owner decides what can and can't be posted. Though whether or not he will feel the need to explain himself I do not know.

As a moderator I just ensure the rules set by the owner are not broken.

Head1 · « **Reply #4984 on:** April 03, 2021, 02:48:18 pm »

Quote from: PatMacGroin on April 03, 2021, 01:09:13 pm

When I go back through my posting history I have noticed quite alot of photo's that have been deleted. All of them were photo's which had been openly shared on AW when I saved copies of them. Some of them may have been moved into the private galleries now, but at the time I saved them they were openly available within the public domain.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=260592.msg2661512#msg2661512

Sometimes I get a request to remove images for a wide range of reasons. If I feel that the reason is a valid one, I will remove them

laurenb · « **Reply #4985 on:** May 01, 2021, 10:45:00 pm »

That’s seems to be reasonable . Women can have children or be threaten by local pimps when their photos are being published on ukpunting .

Payyourwaymate · « **Reply #4986 on:** May 02, 2021, 10:04:21 am »

Quote from: laurenb on May 01, 2021, 10:45:00 pm

That’s seems to be reasonable . Women can have children or be threaten by local pimps when their photos are being published on ukpunting .

Huh?

scutty brown · « **Reply #4987 on:** May 02, 2021, 11:20:55 am »

Quote from: Payyourwaymate on May 02, 2021, 10:04:21 am

Huh?

Simple
Pimps can - and have - used verification photos to identify / target / blackmail women into working for them. Or to intimidate competing women into moving. Or in some cases girls get targeted by nutters.
A few examples have emerged on here over the years, but they will be the tip of the iceberg.
I'm not going to give any examples - women threatened in this way are legally entitled to anonymity

Payyourwaymate · « **Reply #4988 on:** May 02, 2021, 06:51:58 pm »

Quote from: scutty brown on May 02, 2021, 11:20:55 am

Simple
Pimps can - and have - used verification photos to identify / target / blackmail women into working for them. Or to intimidate competing women into moving. Or in some cases girls get targeted by nutters.
A few examples have emerged on here over the years, but they will be the tip of the iceberg.
I'm not going to give any examples - women threatened in this way are legally entitled to anonymity

I see, thanks.

Mr_Shins · « **Reply #4989 on:** May 05, 2021, 08:29:28 am »

I think it's a good rule. If someone wants their photo to be hidden then it should not be displayed on the internet.

They send the verification photo in private to Adultwork to verify their account. Whilst it's true that there is no guarantee that the one who creates the account is the person you will meet, the fact is it's intended to be a private verification with the site, not something to be displayed on a public forum.

Let us really respect privacy.

Junkyardgrunze · « **Reply #4990 on:** May 06, 2021, 02:55:00 pm »

Quote from: Mr_Shins on May 05, 2021, 08:29:28 am

I think it's a good rule. If someone wants their photo to be hidden then it should not be displayed on the internet.

They send the verification photo in private to Adultwork to verify their account. Whilst it's true that there is no guarantee that the one who creates the account is the person you will meet, the fact is it's intended to be a private verification with the site, not something to be displayed on a public forum.

Let us really respect privacy.

The problem is nowadays they a certain girl to verify the profile and then they change the photo in the profile with no face and sometimes stolen photos. The point of this community is to help fellow punters from being scammed or save from being bait and switch scenarios. It would have not been a problem but recently many Brazilian and Romanian WG’s pimp has been using this trick to lure fellow punters, some of whom won’t be able to walkout like others. Pure scam.

aanimator · « **Reply #4991 on:** May 10, 2021, 11:41:12 pm »

Quote from: Mr_Shins on May 05, 2021, 08:29:28 am

I think it's a good rule. If someone wants their photo to be hidden then it should not be displayed on the internet.

They send the verification photo in private to Adultwork to verify their account. Whilst it's true that there is no guarantee that the one who creates the account is the person you will meet, the fact is it's intended to be a private verification with the site, not something to be displayed on a public forum.

Let us really respect privacy.

I agree, even though it was nice to see verification pics on ukp, I can imagine it makes it a hassle for whoever owns the site when they get complaints from girls about stuff being on here. I don't remember it being that useful for me on this thread, but it was handy in reviews about specific girls, where their gallery was completely different to their verification. Then again verification's can make girls look rough but in person they look great.

Who the fuck care's that much anyway. A review with a profile link and a few photos is sufficient for me.

socksfellan2 · « **Reply #4992 on:** August 24, 2021, 07:48:03 pm »

Apologies, I didn't read the thread before posting a verification photo.

ollielon · « **Reply #4993 on:** September 21, 2021, 10:36:32 pm »

yes i see the point .. it was useful but i can imagine privacy concerns .. i would not be confortable with my photo on this thread or any other and would be glad if there was an easy way to remove it ... I think some of these verified pics were public by default on AW and had to opt out specifically ..

Marmalade · « **Reply #4994 on:** September 24, 2021, 01:53:06 am »

Good job someone’s drawn attention to this rule as it could be easily overlooked. As I understand it, public gallery photos are ok but not ones from the paid-for private gallery or verification photos. Good to know what the rules are, even if the hidden photos have served a purpose in the past.

I rarely pay for photos. But what can be useful is flicking thru the public gallery. Often a p4p just sticks loads of photos (including more up to date ones) there and only the best one on the profile.

On private gallery or verification pics, if you’ve seen them and they are at odds with the public photos, it’s maybe ok to describe the differences in words to help prevent punters being conned by a profile picture several years and several pounds out of date.

Rstone · « **Reply #4995 on:** August 11, 2022, 07:16:36 am »

Hi All,

I had not used the purple site for a while and can’t remember how to view verif pics on there.

Could you remind everyone how to please ?

Thanks in advance

scutty brown · « **Reply #4996 on:** August 11, 2022, 07:20:38 am »

Quote from: Rstone on August 11, 2022, 07:16:36 am

Hi All,

I had not used the purple site for a while and can’t remember how to view verif pics on there.

Could you remind everyone how to please ?

Thanks in advance

you can no longer view them: they are hidden

Makuta99 · « **Reply #4997 on:** September 29, 2023, 04:12:01 pm »

We need this service back asap

PilotMan · « **Reply #4998 on:** September 29, 2023, 04:42:38 pm »

Quote from: Makuta99 on September 29, 2023, 04:12:01 pm

We need this service back asap

Why do YOU need it?

daviemac · « **Reply #4999 on:** September 29, 2023, 04:58:05 pm »

Quote from: Makuta99 on September 29, 2023, 04:12:01 pm

We need this service back asap

You do realise that you have revived a thread that contains AdultWork verification pictures and they can't be posted, reposted, linked to or quoted and doing so can result in a ban don't you?

While we're on is there any viable reason for your lack of contributions to the site by way of reviews?

Author Topic: AdultWork verification photos (London) (Read 560041 times)

Member Benefits