Miss Valeria Vixen - Not her or no longer her - Heathrow

[nightthrill19]

External Link/Members Only

Price and when - £120 for 1 hour, incall.  Within past week.

Location & facilities - Possibly converted office block on Bath Road, Heathrow.  2-bedroom flat, another woman was present.  Heard another guy come in.  Plenty of towels.  Communal area is a bit messy.  Open ground floor reception, no one attending it.  Nearest hotels are Novotel, Ibis Styles, Radisson Red.  -Latter would be ideal for parking.  But took me a while to find a place to park with some confidence, no permitted areas and generally, no rough-looking areas.

Comms - Called on day, a few hours before the intended meet, answered within seconds.

Services - Missionary.  No CIM as advertised though advertised, no kissing.

The meet and looks - Not the girl in the pics and private gallery.  In the sense that if it was her, those days are long gone.  My 3 identifying marks I tried to go and confirm/deny this were the beauty marks on her left breast at 12 o'clock, the one on her left bicep and the one on her right breast at our 4 o'clock.  I only clocked the one at 12 o'clock.  I was just so annoyed that I picked another profile that is not accurate.  Didn't bother looking for the other two.  She's about 5'3", Spanish-background seems very plausible as her accent sounded genuine and looks-wise.  Two-tone blonde/brown hair.  Possibly late 30s possibly enhanced by being a smoker (can smell it in breath).  Oh yes, she mouth-dodged me for kissing.  I was desperate for that triangle/hourglass build.  Reminded me of someone at work who I suspected was packing that body type.   She is more round/pear.    Her breasts are enhanced.  More ball-shaped and you can feel the hardness underneath the skin.  She has a bit of podge, too.  Looking back at her pics, her hands were already 'veiny' and some slight hint her nipples were pointing south, anyway.  Not much English as other reviewer said.

Went for shower (though I went before at home and shaved my body, too).  I like to make an effort, too (esp. if it increases the chances of OWO/CIM should the SP be feeling a bit uneasy about my looks).  Even coming back from the shower, baby wipes were generously flung at my dick.  The final thing that ruined it was no sooner had OWO begun, did she mention/gesture "no finish" pointing to her mouth.  Just did missionary, finished in the bag.  Then, out the door, wondering if this dire landscape will ever change from what appears the 'heyday' of about 5-10 years ago.   ...I know in myself, I need to get back into central and try other areas in the country...

My rationale for this one:  She was tied with 1 positive, negative and neutral.  I decided to try this one out as it felt like one previous review may have been a bit harsh though services were provided.  And, another was neutral but which was just a first-review for the OP.  I decided to try to read between the lines and do some legwork myself.  I tried to roughly ID the public and private pic ages with what appears to be her Samsung blue phone, with what looks like dual lenses.  So I rationalised these pics could be as old as 2018/19.  Those better versed with Samsungs can probably get a more accurate timeline/so pics could be older.  So, in my head, IF the pics were accurate or just slightly out, I may end-up with a fit 20-something, a mature-looking 30-something or a 40-something with some signs of ageing.  Any 3 would've been acceptable.  If I had landed that body-type and naturals which still maintained a boner, I'd have been happy as Larry.  AND, I'd have been happy to pay for an extra half hour.  I ended-up with nowhere near.


Summary
Weighing it up with the fact I don't do this that often these days, with the amount of effort I put in before any meet, on my own appearance, the searching for a secure parking location, misrepresentation of services and unfortunately, the misrepresenation of herself, it's a negative from me.  Would never go back.


Comparison and pursuit of my Top 4 Meets:
SweetKinkyNicole (2641728);
_Natalie_x (4151879);
Shy Tiffany (2592267);
xxxKama (1313400).

Nowhere near.  ...But the search for those levels goes on