Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: New Chinese service  (Read 1921 times)


Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,462
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
The point being?   :unknown:

Touting is against the rules.  It isn't even in your area.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2023, 08:09:14 am by daviemac »

Offline bops909

The point being?   :unknown:

Touting is against the rules.  It isn't even in your area.

Look at the link again ....  :cool:

what word is spelt correctly in several places in the advert but not everywhere ?

Offline scutty brown

Have you read the advert?

"Chinese massacre in Stowmarket IP14"    ????

Do you seriously think I'm touting that as a service?
I posted it because it's a funny fuckup by whoever created the profile and I thought some might find amusement from it.
Obviously not all do.

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,462
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
Look at the link again ....  :cool:

what word is spelt correctly in several places in the advert but not everywhere ?
I've no idea what word's spelt incorrectly, all I know is the title says "new Chinese service" with a link to an advert with no further explanation.

There's a thread about mistakes on AW but it makes it clear it's about mistakes it doesn't just list AW profiles. 

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,462
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
Have you read the advert?

"Chinese massacre in Stowmarket IP14"    ????

Do you seriously think I'm touting that as a service?
I posted it because it's a funny fuckup by whoever created the profile and I thought some might find amusement from it.
Obviously not all do.
See above reply, a lot of people wouldn't notice a spelling mistake and just see what they expect to see, me included.

Offline scutty brown

So I shouldn't have posted it because viewers wouldn't see the mistake???

I'd have thought most could differentiate "massacre" from "massage"?
« Last Edit: July 24, 2023, 08:32:44 am by scutty brown »

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,462
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
So I shouldn't have posted it because viewers wouldn't see the mistake???

I'd have thought most could differentiate "massacre" from "massage"?
No I'm not saying that at all, what I'm saying it's you should have indicated it was about an spelling error.

From my point of view, you use Asian massage places that advertise on VS, you post a link to an Asian massage place on VS. I'm glancing through the advert expecting it to say massage so that's what I see, people seeing what they expect to see is a very common thing with spelling errors going unnoticed as a result.

Like those pictures with something hidden, once it's pointed out it's obvious and seen every time you read it.

"New Chinese service" to me is just a new Chinese massage parlour.

Offline Bat

I have to admit I didn’t spot the spelling error either.

I had to check the link to see if I could spot the new service. The first thing I noticed was that the ad says they provide a massage at £50 an hour but there’s and extra charge of £30 for “massage” 🤦‍♂️

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,462
  • Likes: 391
  • Reviews: 24
I have to admit I didn’t spot the spelling error either.

I had to check the link to see if I could spot the new service. The first thing I noticed was that the ad says they provide a massage at £50 an hour but there’s and extra charge of £30 for “massage” 🤦‍♂️
Perhaps a title of 'mistakes on VivaStreet adverts' to go with the mistakes on AW thread would have been better, then everyone knows it's a mistake they're looking for. 

It could be added to with others as well.   :unknown:

Offline Bat

Good call, makes sense to me :)

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

Everi wun noe that stowemarkert is a dangerous place boi;!!!

Actually their pricing is very suspect, seems even a massage is an extra!!
« Last Edit: July 24, 2023, 07:27:28 pm by Watts.E.Dunn »

Offline Stevelondon

The one thing the OP does show. Is that different people have different views on what may or may not be seen as …….. humour/wit……. Whatever.

I got it by the way.

But I also thought what was posted after the opening post was equally as hilarious.

Just my warped sense of humour I suppose.  :crazy: :lol: