lovelly_cassandra or abby_sweet_1991

[marco.f]

I originally booked this girl:

External Link/Members Only

When I come at Willesden Green, I called her (she asked me to call her 30 minutes before coming), but I couldn't understand a word at the phone. So I sent her another message, and tried to call her, but the phone was off. Probably she told me she was busy, I don't know (I was a little bit angry, because it's not the first time here). I looked at my phone, and searching for older messages containing "Willsden Green" and found a number to which I sent / received one message 1 month ago more or less (I couldn't remember who she was, but If i sent a message, she would probable be OK for me, probably one I came to see here and had the same problem, so my mind told me to avoid her but since I was there...). So I sent her a msg asking if she was free, she told me I had to wait 1 hour, and then after 10 minutes I sent her another message asking if she could be free soon and she told me she was free (later I tell you who she was..). When I reached the house (I called her and she told me the number), the location is not very privacy-preserving, it's on the main street, in-between two shops, she came downstairs to open the door. My first impression is that she had a pretty face but was dress like someone sleeping all day, no make up. We went first floor, there was smell of smoke (not that much), she had taken a mint before me noticing it. The house is very small, one bed-flat. I asked her for FK and OWO (asked for confirmation, cause I already asked in my previous messages, and she told me OK). So I opted for 30 minutes/60P. I don't want to go into details now, so I'll summarize them here:

POSITIVE
-She is gentle
-Pretty face
-Not clock watching (also because the watch is broken...)
-I had 3 or 4 positions, she was not cold but not involved either (she always kept eyes closed, like she doesn't like the job, but that's understandable...)
-Boobs are really big. Even if I much prefer smaller and tighter boobs, I really enjoyed them. Big and soft (all natural), but the kind of boobs that are OK when the girl is not standing on her back, otherwise the gravity shrink them... But overall, really outstanding
-In the middle of the fucking, I was thinking of giving her other 20 pounds for other 30 minutes, but I didn't ask (I really don't know if she would have accepted), so I was enjoying it the fucking.

MILDLY POSITIVE
-Light DFK all 30 minutes
-OWO was OK (probably should be in the positive list), but I stopped it soon after.

Negative
-I tried to do 69, but down there she stinks, both holes...). That really put me down, so I asked to fuck her.

Other info:
-She is Spanish (I thought she was Romanian, cause I remember the girls I searched for here where all Romanians), and she told me she is 20 (could be).
-She told me she will remain long
-Received several messages/calls (but she did not answer until I finished).

After what I think where 25 minutes or more, I asked for CIM and anal (I like to ask, even if I know they tell me no), and she told me no. I asked to come on her boobs, she told me no. Then I asked her to manually finish me, while I alternatively kiss her or lick her boobs while a finger in her pussy: that was worth it.

So in the end, the punt would have been positive, but the 69 was really really negative. Would I return? Probably not, but I cannot say for sure I will not go again (but this time specifically asking for cleanliness...). Bathroom is not that good, but she allowed me to use it (no soap...only shower gel in the shower, which I took it...)

When I arrived at home, I've searched for the phone number on adultwork: this is the person corresponding:

External Link/Members Only

But she is not her! So I re-looked at the photos of the girl I called first (the one I did not understand the  during the phone conversation), and she is the girl I met:

External Link/Members Only

So in the end, I think she has 3 numbers (because I also sent a message to another one I had in old msg, and I think she was her, same answers).

So, that was my punt of the day A kind of a mistery story à la Edgar Allan Poe solved with a lot of investigation and acumen 

[Luke]

How tall is she, and size ? she looks great but her service seems very average, also her profile seems to be a big lie

[som2083]

She looks like this lady too? same number?
External Link/Members Only

[Jason]

So the girl you saw is Cassandra and the title should be clarified. I think you just corresponded with their pimp or it was because girls in share flats many times pass their phones to each other when they are busy. And she is no way Spanish. She is Romanian 100%.

Light DFK? What a heck is this?
There is lipkissing (no tongue involvement). This should NOT be considered or referred to as French kissing at all.
French Kissing is with tongue and the 4 variations are:
(i) reluctant/light French kissing (lip locking plus just a couple of reluctant tongue flicks every now and then)
(ii) proper, sensual french kissing as shown External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
(iii) proper, passionate French kissing as shown External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
(iv) deep-throat French kissing aka deep French kissing as shown External Link/Members Only

I guess that by light DFK you just meant light FK in order to highlight the fact that there was some slight tongue involvement as opposed to "Romanian French kissing" which is just lipkissing and their “ Romanian Deep French kissing” which is the proper sensual French kissing.

Deep French kissing classification was previously discussed here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=15737.msg313019#msg313019

Please  reviewers stop referring to kissing as DFK just because there is tongue involvement and if not proper (as per definitions of (ii) or (iii) above) name it light DFK. There is no such thing!!!

[marco.f]

How tall is she, and size ? she looks great but her service seems very average, also her profile seems to be a big lie

She is something like 165cm (I don't know in feet...). She is not fat but I wouldn't say skinny.

[marco.f]

She looks like this lady too? same number?
External Link/Members Only

They seem to have the same way to have their name, like something_sweet_year. But this in the picture is another one.

[marco.f]

Hey man, what's the problem with you? She told me she is Spanish, can you read man? I didn't say she is Spanish, I said she told me she is Spanish: I asked her are you Romanian, and she told me not, I'm Spanish, then I asked her where from, she told me near Valencia, sorry man I don't speak Spanish neither Romanian, next time I'll have some proper language tests and only if she gets at least a B2 certificate I will write it in the forum. I don't want to argue about light DFK and all the crazy nomenclature you said: do you really think I want to distinguish four kind of FKs? If you don't like the title, changed it, I'm pretty sure what I wrote is true.

Take it easy man.
 

So the girl you saw is Cassandra and the title should be clarified. I think you just corresponded with their pimp or it was because girls in share flats many times pass their phones to each other when they are busy. And she is no way Spanish. She is Romanian 100%.

Light DFK? What a heck is this?
There is lipkissing (no tongue involvement). This should NOT be considered or referred to as French kissing at all.
French Kissing is with tongue and the 4 variations are:
(i) reluctant/light French kissing (lip locking plus just a couple of reluctant tongue flicks every now and then)
(ii) proper, sensual french kissing as shown External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
(iii) proper, passionate French kissing as shown External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
(iv) deep-throat French kissing aka deep French kissing as shown External Link/Members Only

I guess that by light DFK you just meant light FK in order to highlight the fact that there was some slight tongue involvement as opposed to "Romanian French kissing" which is just lipkissing and their “ Romanian Deep French kissing” which is the proper sensual French kissing.

Deep French kissing classification was previously discussed here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=15737.msg313019#msg313019

Please  reviewers stop referring to kissing as DFK just because there is tongue involvement and if not proper (as per definitions of (ii) or (iii) above) name it light DFK. There is no such thing!!!

[Jason]

Hey man, what's the problem with you? She told me she is Spanish, can you read man? I didn't say she is Spanish, I said she told me she is Spanish

Look. First of all you said she is Spanish as if you kind of verified it, not that she told you she is Spanish. You only used "she told me" for her age.

Other info:
-She is Spanish (I thought she was Romanian, cause I remember the girls I searched for here where all Romanians), and she told me she is 20 (could be).
-She told me she will remain long
-Received several messages/calls (but she did not answer until I finished).

You are perhaps new to punting and you don't know that many Romanians lie about being from Mediterranean countries especially Italy and Spain because Romanian WGs have bad reputation. Also her profile clearly says at the bottom that she is Romanian, i.e. she supplied a copy of her passport or ID to AW indicating she is Romanian (the reason she is not fully verified is because she has not provided proof of residence in UK). There is no need to test her Spanish or Romanian. Unless of course the profile has been passed to her by a Romanian WG. Yet again what are the odds of her not being Romanian as well and instead be Spanish? 1 in a trillion? Anyway.

I don't want to argue about light DFK and all the crazy nomenclature you said: do you really think I want to distinguish four kind of FKs?

It is not about distinguishing between 4 kinds of French kissing. What I wanted to say is that there is no such term as “light DFK”. I didn't want to attack you but to highlight a very common mistake made by many reviewers – not just you. Whenever this wrong term is used it is unclear whether the reviewer wants to refer to proper French kissing or (as it is usually the case) to  light/reluctant French Kissing. Personally I am still very satisfied with just "proper French Kissing" and not (true) DFK. But I am not happy with reluctant FK. I am pretty certain that the vast majority of UKP members would not rate as negative or neutral or "mildly" positive the lack of (true) DFK if just "proper FK" is provided but instead they will think of it as positive. Anyway.