Kerry in Watford

[panel999]

Going through a period at present where I am seeing the slightly 'Older' girl instead of the 18-25 younger teens - Just making a slight change - similar to when I was meeting  up with the taller girls 5' 11''+ (I am 5' 5'')
I always beleive that sometimes you need a new challange and to try something different - This was also a 30 mins session instead of my usual 1-2 hours punt. Meeting with Kerry on Thursday afternoon for 30 mins for £80

ALSO VERY IMPORTANT is that this could have been a positive review by another punter had they found Kerry more attractive than myself.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only++++++++++

The good bit as per my AW post for kerry - ''Very good BJ in different positions as well as lots of dirty talk in between doggy and come all over her tits, Nice relaxed session and no clock watcher''.
She was clean and chatty - great large soft tits and nipples, clean shaven pussy although more saggy and heading south. Also IMO more late 30's than 33 - maybe add +6/6 years extra but very soft - looks wise very average 5/10 -

Had a quick shower, she is based near the station near the shopping centre in a small 1 bedroom house - fit for purpose with nice bedroom and nice bed - had a shower she did look a lot better when she had her bra on as her tits are very large and soft with great nipples that are very suckable. She started with DFK - very good - and DTBJ again Very good, tried her front and doggy and thencome all over her tits - she was talking dirty all through the session and to be fair she is good with what she does -

SO WHY the negative!!! - She is definately not 33, closer to 40 IMO, i would class her as a very fit MILF with good body and large tits and arse. However from my point of view I found her very plain in looks and really not attractive - Also If I am NOT willing to do a second return visit then I would class it as a negative.

Thanks for reading

 

[Steve2]

I am confused Panel. You left her a positive on Adultwork and a negative here

I haven't seen Kerry for a couple of months but she certainly was very fit then. Kept talking about her Zumba dance classes.

As you say very good service and chatty. Slim with big tits. Facially I find her attractive but as always that is subjective.

I'd have said the age is fairly accurate.

 There are lots of girls I have seen who, for one reason or another ,I would not return to but wouldn't give them a negative just for that

[NightKid]

I am confused Panel. You left her a positive on Adultwork and a negative here

Didn't realise that until you mentioned it.

[panel999]

Just to clarify what i put on Aw i also put onto the UKP post - she was good at DFK and also good DTBJ, however what made this review field report move into the Neutral zone and then into the Negative punt was a couple of major points -

!. Her age - she is more near 40 than the early 30's as per her profile - we all know that some/most wg's do not tell the truth about their age and we normally have to add a few years on especially if they say they are between age 28-35 in my experience, however in Kerry's case IMO  it was too far out - she is much more in the MILF stage and maybe hitting age 40.

2. I know beauty is very subjective and everyone would look at a girl different but at best in my eyes she is 5/10 - def does not warrent anything more than this.

Again her service is good as mentioned in AW review BUT overall taking into account the 2 points above I would rate this for UKP members a Negative. if I had known that she was a lot older then I would NOT have seen her and gone and booked elsewhere.

Hope that explains the pomts bought up by the previous posts.
Thanks

[Tailpipe]

Panel

I sort of understand your position on this , one , but I suspect you will be in for
A shit storm for going positive on AW and negative on UKP .

I hope not as you have made a massive contribution to the forum this year
 

[panel999]

Maybe - all i said on AW was that she did a good BJ and also DFK - it was just feed back, AW does not give you a lot of room to do a fulll review unlesss ou do a proper field report/

As mentioned in earlier thread - she is nearer 40 not early 30's and if she had this on her profile I would not have had the meeting in the first place

[Tailpipe]

Maybe - all i said on AW was that she did a good BJ and also DFK - it was just feed back, AW does not give you a lot of room to do a fulll review unlesss ou do a proper field report/

As mentioned in earlier thread - she is nearer 40 not early 30's and if she had this on her profile I would not have had the meeting in the first place

I agree that makes it a negative , for sure .

[oinki]

Everyone rate differently here anyways. I would have probably given her positive here, you fqor the reason of services and how it was provided, I am less fussed about looks unless its falsely advertised because that is the risk one take with no face pictures. If only neutral option... ...

[LL]

I sort of understand your position on this , one , but I suspect you will be in for
A shit storm for going positive on AW and negative on UKP .

I said it before when the debate came up about our review system - I reckon we should be able to just write reviews with as much detail as we care to remember / share and leave out the rating altogether if we choose to.  Then it would be up to the reader to establish whether it would likely be a positive experience for them if they were to visit the same girl in the future.
Should the reader really care if the rating left by the reviewer is positive or negative?  Surely the review itself is the only thing of relevance since we all have different preferences, priorities and tolerances.

[panel999]

Yes totally agree LL - the reader can then decide maybe give a points systems 1-10?

[BeesKnees]

Could you not have given Kerry a neutral rating on aw?

The feedback comment and positive rating will appear to be a solid thumbs up to a regular punter.

So to clear things up, bottom line, she provides a very good service but you didn't find her attractive so she's a neutral?

EDIT: Made text bold so it'll be easier to read when scanning

[panel999]

Yes would agree with your comments - also the fact that IMO she is closer to 40 than 32/33...

[BeesKnees]

 

[Steve2]

Maybe - all i said on AW was that she did a good BJ and also DFK - it was just feed back, AW does not give you a lot of room to do a fulll review unlesss ou do a proper field report/

Positive    panel999 (83)    23/08/2013 00:45    Seeking Services
     Very good BJ in different positions as well as lots of dirty talk in between doggy and come all over her tits, Nice relaxed session and no clock watcher

Panel, you can do positive or negative on Adultwork  or feedback only if the booking has not been accepted. I still can't see why you did a positive review and didnt mention the age discrepancy that you think exists

[pay as u hoe]

isnt it obvious why he left positive on AW and neg on UKP. He doesnt want to risk getting a shit rating on his profile from Kerry, where as on UKP he can tell it like it is. But there is no chance he is going to admit as much.   

[Tailpipe]

isnt it obvious why he left positive on AW and neg on UKP. He doesnt want to risk getting a shit rating on his profile from Kerry, where as on UKP he can tell it like it is. But there is no chance he is going to admit as much.

This is the problem with the AW system which is why I never use it and never will
My fb is zero being a member for over 10 years , I have never left fb to a WG on aw.
This is why the very experienced punters like smiths does not believe a word of what's posted on aw.

Panel is top class and has provided many with top class punts in London.
Whatever his reason , he's not going to get any shit off me over it.

However you have made a good point and I understood you view.   



 

[panel999]

''pay as u hoe'' = Yes you may be correct in your post -

I put everything on the UKP post that i put on the AW FB. I said on AW that she does DFK and nice DTBJ - However IMO she is not good looking a 5/10 at best and is older than her profile age, nearer 40 than early 30's - If I had known before she was older i would not have arranged the meeting.  The AW remarks are 100% correct she does DFK and also DTBJ this is NOT a lie and 100% true.
To me she becomes a Negative due to the age and looks....

[smiths]

I have punted with Kerry as Steve knows although its a couple of years ago now. A good WG then, i found her attractive with a good attitude offering me what was agreed. Looked around the age she advertised as being to me.

Seems her profile is down at present.

[FlaccidoDomingo]

hi...long time lurker here just jioned up...i to have seen kerry,about 2 years ago,and found it enjoyable experience,she's into role play and stuff but opted for gfe ,would put her around mid 30,s....nice body and face,very pleasent girl,spent an hour and half session with her at the time,done a bit of reverse oral,but got a mouth full of lube,but shouldnt of swallowed and had a sore throat for a day afterward coughing the bloody stuff up.anyways id say her profile is pretty much accurate and was an okay punt,i didnt return due to being skint these days and punting is kept more for a birthday treat..though i did do alot of punting in the past.

[panel999]

Smiths and Steve2 - really value you feed back - as said before in my case with Kerry although her service was as per profile it did not work with me so I put it down as a Negative - But as mentioned before some guys will look at her as a lot more prettier than what i saw. As previously mentioned beauty is very subjective. Some guys who saw her a fe years ago put her age at mid 30's so my assumption that she is neraer 40 is maybe correct? HOWEVER I could be wrong and if I am then apologies and take everything back.

If UKP members prefer I would ask NIK to delete the whole post completely.

[NightKid]

If UKP members prefer I would ask NIK to delete the whole post completely.

I reckon some are just saying you were a little wishy-washy with this one. Do your review on UKP first next time and if it's a negative here, it should be a negative there as well. 
No point in deleting it as it's still a warning for other punters, although probably to a lesser amount than if you had marked it the same as on AW.

[herbie007]

I guess Panel’s expectations of the girl’s he sees are high due to the fact he has shagged so many gorgeous girls in such a short space of time, and I’m glad he did as two of those have been the best fucks of my life.

He says in his report
ALSO VERY IMPORTANT is that this could have been a positive review by another punter had they found Kerry more attractive than myself.

I reckon Panel’s being honest with us, knowing our expectations are higher than those whom just seek AW feedback.

[smiths]

Smiths and Steve2 - really value you feed back - as said before in my case with Kerry although her service was as per profile it did not work with me so I put it down as a Negative - But as mentioned before some guys will look at her as a lot more prettier than what i saw. As previously mentioned beauty is very subjective. Some guys who saw her a fe years ago put her age at mid 30's so my assumption that she is neraer 40 is maybe correct? HOWEVER I could be wrong and if I am then apologies and take everything back.

If UKP members prefer I would ask NIK to delete the whole post completely.

I would say Kerry is anywhere between her advertised age of 33 and 37, as i dont ask for photo ID she could be older.

This is your review on your punt with her, i certainly wouldnt want it to be deleted.

[glorfindel]

Panel, can you give us some recommendations for taller girls you have seen?

[panel999]

VIP Roxane - see my UKP review - over 6' 3''+ in heels - also Mia stars but she is away at Home in Hungrey.

Also maggie21 anal siperstar is very tall and well built a good size 10. Also a girl in Esse tall +6' BUT complete waste of time she is based in CM post code - £120 worse spend in a long time - did not even get hard enough to come...

[belinelli]

I really want to book a session with Kerry - can you briefly describe what she looks like ? Does she resemble anyone ?

[dritzter]

It is the old horses for course?
I saw Kerry about 6 years ago and she was around 30 then.  Kerry's age and looks were close enough on AW (lord know how many are not!). So she is prob about 38/39 now.

Her services are good, she is friendly, chatty and not a clock watcher - Again as with panel999 she is not the sort i usually go for  but she made up in other areas.

It was a good review, just bit harsh with Negative but entitled to opinion.