Anna Carter in call Canary Wharf

[Duck]

External Link/Members Only
I met Anna in her on tour apartment in Canary Wharf while she was on tour a couple of months ago. £250 for 1-hour, touring rates. She normally operates from Hove I believe.
She is a fit as fuck, late 30’s early 40’s, gym toned body and naughty as you like.
She came down to meet me and I followed her up to her room, where she was fun and filthy in equal measure. Plenty of mutual oral and rimming both ways. Finished with a monster facial which she photographed for her private gallery. It was a pretty good coating, say so myself.
Her profile appears to have gone now but hopefully will be back and if so, she is an experience I would like to repeat.

[Waterhouse]

She changed her profile a couple of weeks back.  New profile here …  External Link/Members Only

[patelprat]

Looks great. Hopefully she comes back this way again.

[Duck]

Glad she's not disappeared.

Her pictures are totally representative. Thanks for finding her new profile.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[amateurbcn]

This girl is great in bed. I made a review of her when I visited in Brighton

[Ivor Hunch]

it probably doesn't matter, but I note that she seems to have been able to carry over all old feedback on AW into the new Sept 2024 profile.

What I also note is that there were, for example, 5 reviews dated 19 Sept, and 7 reviews dated 17 Sept-  which suggests something of a conveyor belt approach.

[Sparta Prada]

What I also note is that there were, for example, 5 reviews dated 19 Sept, and 7 reviews dated 17 Sept-  which suggests something of a conveyor belt approach.

The dates for AW reviews are when the review was left, ie not the date or time when the meet or booking actually took place.

[Stevelondon]

Going off the reviews she seems popular. But I doubt she operates a conveyor belt system.
I’d guess when she tours it’s when she has enough bookings to warrant it.
Just a guess of course 🤷🏼

[Ivor Hunch]

The dates for AW reviews are when the review was left, ie not the date or time when the meet or booking actually took place.

is that right?  I thought that the way it worked was that reviews only happen where there is an AW booking request/ acceptance, and the date that shows for the review is the booking date, NOT the date the review is written.

i may well be wrong- happy to stand corrected

[Waterhouse]

is that right?  I thought that the way it worked was that reviews only happen where there is an AW booking request/ acceptance, and the date that shows for the review is the booking date, NOT the date the review is written.

i may well be wrong- happy to stand corrected

The review/feedback date is not necessarily reflective/the same as the booking date.  Feedback can be left or given at least a couple of weeks later.  Not sure if there is a cut off date for feedback to be given/reciprocatefd though.  I left feedback for an SP a few weeks back and she left me feedback about three weeks later.  The date was the date when the feedback was left, not when the booking took place.

You do have to hve made a booking and for the booking to have been confirmed/completed before you can leave positive, negtive, or neutral feedback, otherwise it just shows as “feedback only”.

[pepsicolaboy]

but I note that she seems to have been able to carry over all old feedback on AW into the new Sept 2024 profile

Why is AW letting members do that & when did that start? other than to change the member name and web url etc....seems very strange they would allow that particular how draconian can be with shutting accounts down

Edit:
perhaps it means SP can lower there age over time, with less suspicion because the account appears New ('oh I havent see her before')

Perhaps the SP want to give the impression they have not been around the block, when they are many years into the work

 

[Waterhouse]

Why is AW letting members do that & when did that start? other than to change the member name and web url etc....seems very strange they would allow that particular how draconian can be with shutting accounts down

Edit:
perhaps it means SP can lower there age over time, with less suspicion because the account appears New ('oh I havent see her before')

Perhaps the SP want to give the impression they have not been around the block, when they are many years into the work

 

None of us know why AC changed/renewed her profile. However, given she is a very well established and reliable SP, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise there must have been both valid and mitigating circumstances as to why AW transferred her feedback to her new profile. They certainly don’t do it by default for every member who changes and renews their profiles when they feel like it.

[Bartolomeo]

She's now moved to London, but price is £300 p/h now 

[patelprat]

She's now moved to London, but price is £300 p/h now 

I recall seeing her in Hove late last year for £200.

[Waterhouse]

She's now moved to London, but price is £300 p/h now 

Are you sure she’s actually moved/relocated?  I thought perhaps just visiting London temporarily.  Either way, I suspect an upped price tag of £300 may well deter punters who may have had her hot-listed at £200.

[patelprat]

Are you sure she’s actually moved/relocated?  I thought perhaps just visiting London temporarily.  Either way, I suspect an upped price tag of £300 may well deter punters who may have had her hot-listed at £200.

Permanent (so far as what permanent means these days). I asked her.
It's quite a price hike, even for London, compared to some other comparable SPs.

[scutty brown]

now  Anna Carter UK
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Bartolomeo]

Are you sure she’s actually moved/relocated?  I thought perhaps just visiting London temporarily.  Either way, I suspect an upped price tag of £300 may well deter punters who may have had her hot-listed at £200.

Moved permanently as far as I know.

When she toured to London in November, her rate was £250 for the hour.

[pepsicolaboy]

None of us know why AC changed/renewed her profile. However, given she is a very well established and reliable SP, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise there must have been both valid and mitigating circumstances as to why AW transferred her feedback to her new profile. They certainly don’t do it by default for every member who changes and renews their profiles when they feel like it.

Maybe, maybe not, thats just conjecture IMO. Some of the SP are I believe chummy with some of the aw admin/owners and that also helps. I will assume aw may very well be run from the UK and registered overseas...which makes my first statement more likely.

Just IMO, but im not stating those as facts.

Incidentally the massive former BB from Kent who is much older than her profile, CarlyG, has been able to reduce her age whenever she wants and often appears as 'featured' escort on aw homepage (something most escorts cant simply do)...I read elsewhere there where reasons for this and connections to aw.

'Who you know'...etc

 

[Geko12]

Saw her in Brighton too and it was good but lack of dfk, I would go back to try and sample more dfk but not at 300ph, too much for me

[Waterhouse]

Permanent (so far as what permanent means these days). I asked her.
It's quite a price hike, even for London, compared to some other comparable SPs.

Definitely.

Cheers for the updated info.