Jessey Pettite - Pinner

[Ron89]

External Link/Members Only

I was visiting a friend in the area and had a bad case of blue balls. Not the typical girl I’d punt but I liked her curves and the pics showed potential. She’s a 2 minute walk from the station in a typical punting flat, no thrills. The girl resembles her pics, though she puts zero effort into her appearance. Looks like the type of plain Jane you’d find walking around the supermarket. I’d say she’s late 20s, very mediocre body, small b cups and a sizeable ass, which had some clap, one of the only positives about this. The room was awful, it was a wobbly air mattress on the floor next to a bunk bed. Deciding to stay was not my finest moment. Her oral is awful, it’s like she’d never sucked a dick before and only consisted of an awkward bobbing 1/4 down my shaft, whilst frantically wanking me with her stumpy hand. Stopped her after a minute of that crap and bent her over.

Standing doggy against the wall was basically the only option - did that in the few variations that the room allowed for. She’s very submissive and let me do as I pleased as if she didn’t have a say in the matter. She seemed to be enjoying herself and the moans didn’t seem overly fake. It’s still a negative, I think the £70 entry point is too high given the shit room and the very average aesthetics. If she offered a 15 min p&d for £50 I’d say she’s worth seeing if you’re local.

[DoorDash]

Your reviews are bloody hilarious.

Why do you even punt?

 Constant negative experiences
 

Still better than a wife I guess.

[Ron89]

Your reviews are bloody hilarious.

Why do you even punt?

 Constant negative experiences
 

Still better than a wife I guess.

Oh trust me they’re not all bad. Negs are far more fun to write; I also tend not to share my gems until I know I’m done with them.

[DoorDash]

I also tend not to share my gems until I know I’m done with them.

That’s the spirit!!!

[last_days_of_logan]

That’s the spirit!!!

He has mentioned this before but i actually forgot about when he said that. Its actually refreshing to hear him repeat cause i suspected as much. I used to be like "If Ron says they are pound friendly then i am less likely going to have a problem", by the time he is finished with his good ones it will be too late to review

[mfkr]

Your reviews are bloody hilarious.

Why do you even punt?

 Constant negative experiences
 

Still better than a wife I guess.

 

[mfkr]

Oh trust me they’re not all bad. Negs are far more fun to write; I also tend not to share my gems until I know I’m done with them.

What’s your concern with reviewing?
My mindset is they are working most days, most of the day and I just presume they’re all fairly busy
I know UKP is the main punting community
But for me who only sees girls a few times I’d rather reciprocate a decent punt or share a bad one for the greater good
I also think reviewing is all we have as punters to improve quality
See my recent Brazilian review
I know she’s cheap and her price will go up
I’ve seen her twice I doubt I’ll see her again even tho she’s probs the best value in London atm
She’s why most of us punt
Sharing helps everyone
I guess if u see a SP over weeks or months I can kinda see why you’re cautious
For me the optimum is almost always 2/3 punts and then maybe go back months or years later

[Voyager]

Oh trust me they’re not all bad. Negs are far more fun to write; I also tend not to share my gems until I know I’m done with them.

I think it is helpful to let others know about negative experiences as you have done. It is up to the individual to decide if they wish  to post other reviews.

[Ron89]

What’s your concern with reviewing?
My mindset is they are working most days, most of the day and I just presume they’re all fairly busy
I know UKP is the main punting community
But for me who only sees girls a few times I’d rather reciprocate a decent punt or share a bad one for the greater good
I also think reviewing is all we have as punters to improve quality
See my recent Brazilian review
I know she’s cheap and her price will go up
I’ve seen her twice I doubt I’ll see her again even tho she’s probs the best value in London atm
She’s why most of us punt
Sharing helps everyone
I guess if u see a SP over weeks or months I can kinda see why you’re cautious
For me the optimum is almost always 2/3 punts and then maybe go back months or years later

He’s been banned so not a direct response but fair points and others may be thinking the same. I’ve been burned too many times by positive reviews I’ve written when I intend to revisit the WG.

More often than not she becomes harder to book, more expensive and on occasion has been told about the review and links it back to me, despite doing my best to maintain confidentiality. I’ve been turned away on subsequent visits due to small criticisms even relating to a positive review. The only way to stop this happening is to alter the way I write reviews, through being less descriptive and not giving play by play details. I’ve been told most punters don’t punt like me so it’s apparently quite obvious when they’re reading about long pounding doggy sessions. Writing in a more generic way would be less fun and defeats the purpose for me as I want to enjoy writing reviews rather than just ‘do my bit for the community’.

It’s also very rare for this site to give me a gem, it’s more often than not the other way round given I’m less risk averse with punting unreviewed girls and doing a lot of TOFTTs. Anyway, this is more commonplace than many think: gems have always been withheld in the same way that I do. I’m just honest when called out for it. The drawbacks supersede the pros if you intend to revisit.

Granted I ought to share more positives when I’m done with them, but I either forget, get lazy etc. Such is life.

[Payyourwaymate]

He’s been banned so not a direct response but fair points and others may be thinking the same. I’ve been burned too many times by positive reviews I’ve written when I intend to revisit the WG.

More often than not she becomes harder to book, more expensive and on occasion has been told about the review and links it back to me, despite doing my best to maintain confidentiality. I’ve been turned away on subsequent visits due to small criticisms even relating to a positive review. The only way to stop this happening is to alter the way I write reviews, through being less descriptive and not giving play by play details. I’ve been told most punters don’t punt like me so it’s apparently quite obvious when they’re reading about long pounding doggy sessions. Writing in a more generic way would be less fun and defeats the purpose for me as I want to enjoy writing reviews rather than just ‘do my bit for the community’.

It’s also very rare for this site to give me a gem, it’s more often than not the other way round given I’m less risk averse with punting unreviewed girls and doing a lot of TOFTTs. Anyway, this is more commonplace than many think: gems have always been withheld in the same way that I do. I’m just honest when called out for it. The drawbacks supersede the pros if you intend to revisit.

Granted I ought to share more positives when I’m done with them, but I either forget, get lazy etc. Such is life.

Don't worry about it, it's understandable all of your concerns. You've contributed more than enough for us all  .

[Ron89]

Don't worry about it, it's understandable all of your concerns. You've contributed more than enough for us all  .

Thanks mate, not worried, just good to clear up as get asked a lot.

[MLawro93]

He’s been banned so not a direct response but fair points and others may be thinking the same. I’ve been burned too many times by positive reviews I’ve written when I intend to revisit the WG.

More often than not she becomes harder to book, more expensive and on occasion has been told about the review and links it back to me, despite doing my best to maintain confidentiality. I’ve been turned away on subsequent visits due to small criticisms even relating to a positive review. The only way to stop this happening is to alter the way I write reviews, through being less descriptive and not giving play by play details. I’ve been told most punters don’t punt like me so it’s apparently quite obvious when they’re reading about long pounding doggy sessions. Writing in a more generic way would be less fun and defeats the purpose for me as I want to enjoy writing reviews rather than just ‘do my bit for the community’.

It’s also very rare for this site to give me a gem, it’s more often than not the other way round given I’m less risk averse with punting unreviewed girls and doing a lot of TOFTTs. Anyway, this is more commonplace than many think: gems have always been withheld in the same way that I do. I’m just honest when called out for it. The drawbacks supersede the pros if you intend to revisit.

Granted I ought to share more positives when I’m done with them, but I either forget, get lazy etc. Such is life.

Always value your contributions, lets me know who to avoid! 

[last_days_of_logan]

He’s been banned so not a direct response but fair points and others may be thinking the same. I’ve been burned too many times by positive reviews I’ve written when I intend to revisit the WG.

More often than not she becomes harder to book, more expensive and on occasion has been told about the review and links it back to me, despite doing my best to maintain confidentiality. I’ve been turned away on subsequent visits due to small criticisms even relating to a positive review. The only way to stop this happening is to alter the way I write reviews, through being less descriptive and not giving play by play details. I’ve been told most punters don’t punt like me so it’s apparently quite obvious when they’re reading about long pounding doggy sessions. Writing in a more generic way would be less fun and defeats the purpose for me as I want to enjoy writing reviews rather than just ‘do my bit for the community’.

It’s also very rare for this site to give me a gem, it’s more often than not the other way round given I’m less risk averse with punting unreviewed girls and doing a lot of TOFTTs. Anyway, this is more commonplace than many think: gems have always been withheld in the same way that I do. I’m just honest when called out for it. The drawbacks supersede the pros if you intend to revisit.

Granted I ought to share more positives when I’m done with them, but I either forget, get lazy etc. Such is life.

I know you don't care, which is fine, but I apologise for chasing you around holding a flame to your feet asking for positive reviews. I've been an annoyance to you and i am sorry about that
I won't lie about what i thought about the whole thing (as i have made clear before) but you absolutely have a right to not write a positive review if you don't want to...especially considering your very valid reasons.
You're a good egg sir and overall you have served our community much better than 90% of posters on here...and thats not exagerrating (probably underplaying it). Thanks for giving me a heads up on a couple in the past
As for the ones that you're done with that you forget/get lazy etc, honestly a review isnt needed cause you might feel like you want to go back there on a drunken night and not have to deal with venom in your face.

[Ron89]

I appreciate the kind words guys, glad the reasons are understood now. And Logan if it makes you feel better, it wasn’t just you on my ass about it, though you were one of the higher profile ones. water under the bridge now. 

[last_days_of_logan]

I appreciate the kind words guys, glad the reasons are understood now. And Logan if it makes you feel better, it wasn’t just you on my ass about it, though you were one of the higher profile ones. water under the bridge now.

Considering how often I zoned in on your posts, accepting my apology is really quite big of you and a testament to you character. Appreciate it

[Jbay3004]

You’re a G for this.