Author Topic: MiaClassy W2. Not that classy.  (Read 1346 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7157158) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline jono44

On reading Weeklyhookups review
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=381248
and observing the photos and writeup on AW thought I would give this attractive young size 4 lady a try.
Eventually got to fifth floor after travelling for one hour and at first sight my impulse was to leave. Wish I had followed that impulse. But thought it was bound to get better. Wrong.
The size 4 has morphed into a size 8/10. The 23 year old looked at least 10 years older facially (first thought was ‘ is this the mother’). Though the pictures do seem to be of her body but with mega photoshop on face (perhaps even a new face) and neck etc. And magic photography. As with so many Thais – for that is she over here to make some money, pictures and write ups give no real impression.. Seems to operate her own phone but has poor English. Body not bad for a size 8/10. Good arse for a Thai. Fake tits. Flat stomach. Not fat.
Whole procedure was a service provided to her specification. Oral was not bad but ‘jaw ache’ did not help. Sex was usual but bland. I just did not connect with her on any level nor did she make any attempt to do other than provide the basic service. Those of you who have tried Smooci in Bangkok will know that for every gem (for example J-Net and Kel) there is a lot of crap to go through. Tip – search out those with videos. They are more up to date than the usual 15 years old pictures Smooci allow. Seems similar approach adopted here. 
It is fair to say that this ranks as one of my worst punts ever – both here and in Thailand. And that is saying something.
There was just no connection of any sort. A service provider with the ability to make you feel that she has any thought other than to end the engagement was totally lacking. For me I find that very unusual.
Maybe I had a bad day. She certainly did but I fear that is her normal service. Body there but mind elsewhere. If this is to be her profession for a few weeks she needs to up her game and get someone to provide a more reasonable web blurb. Music student, no. Thai. Speaks some Japanese.  More realistic size and age would assist..
Look forward to reading other reviews, but I fear the ‘weeklyHookups’ advertorial (and its his first and only post) is very far from the mark. Pity. I can usually rely on this forum for objectivity. I do not like to be so negative about any girl trying to make a living, but fear I must make an exception here if only to ensure that it is clear that weeklyhookups review is not necessarily definitive.
 External Link/Members Only
 External Link/Members Only

Offline VidiViciVeni

Did you book through AW?

She has already racked up 15 feedbacks on AW in just 3 weeks, might make sense if she gets all her clients to book through AW.

But of those 15, most of them are from users with no other feedback from other SPs. There are only two exceptions: one has positive feedback from AdrienneFitSexy (50+ not out on UKP) and another has a few other positive reviews the most recent of which was 2019.

This is a bit suspicious, and also runs counter to the following line from her profile:
Quote
I will priorities [sic] booking made through AW and gentlemen with positive reviews. I am sick of getting time wasted and fake bookings.

Offline jono44

Did not book through AW though offered to but offer not taken up.