Your point being? You enjoyed your booking the OP of this review didn't enjoy his as much.
The title of the review is "Having a bad day?" I added my contrasting experiences to reinforce the OP's point that she was maybe having a bad day. Perhaps I should have been clearer.
The OP clearly put in the title of his review that it could have been an off day for her.
I agree - that's why my first two paragraphs basically agreed that it sounds like she had a bad day because my experiences were the opposite to his. My third paragraph was directed to a completely different person who has never met the provider but had some unsubstantiated opinions about her. I also said "if you have a bad experience leaving a review is fair and right". "You" in that sentence is non-specific and was not meant to refer to OP. The sentence is actually agreeing that OP was right to leave his opinion but suggesting that the other person was not. I hope that's clearer now.
I have a basis, otherwise I wouldn’t have said what I said. I also don’t think I’ve slated her.
You cannot possibly have a basis to say that someone has always been bitter and twisted and just hid it well. I'm assuming you are not able to retroactively read the mind of someone you've never met so that is on its face a baseless claim. That was my objection. And if you don't think calling someone bitter and twisted is slating them I do not know what would qualify.
My mistake about the review rules. I could have sworn there was a rule about not reviewing the same provider within three months but clearly I was wrong.
Re: my reviews - I was specifically requested to add the party reviews by a moderator because I commented in another review and he, quite rightly, pointed out that I do not have many reviews. I have been trying to add more hence my recent spurt of activity but all I have done in the past 18 months is those parties, the PSE & GFE and the two other ladies I reviewed. That is literally everything I have to contribute at the moment unless someone has reviewed a provider I've seen, as in this case, and I feel I have something to add. If, for example, someone had posted a negative review for Scarlet_Slut I would have similarly said she was great when I saw her to add a contrasting opinion. Or if they said she was great I would say I'd had a similar experience to reinforce the review. Either way, that to me is a valuable addition to a review and seems to be completely normal based on other reviews I've read here so I'm not really sure what the problem is.
The bit of my comment that seems to have annoyed people is the last paragraph that is asking for people to stick to facts. My first ever review on this site was a negative because the provider ripped me off. Negative reviews are obviously valuable, I just don't see any reason to attack individuals with unsubstantiated claims when you can just detail why their service fell short. In my negative review I didn't attack the person, I attacked her service. It just strikes me as unnecessary and unpleasant to do anything else. Obviously that attitude has rubbed people the wrong way so I'll just stick to writing reviews in future.