Author Topic: Mel (NewBrazilian / YoungNSingle ) Chelsea, Adultwork  (Read 2798 times)


21 review(s) for NAUGHTY.MEL (15 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by ]

d00fer

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well it's about time I did a review. As an aside is there a statute of limitations on how recently you've seen a girl and writing a review? Have seen plenty so far this year and haven't reviewed any of them yet.

So on to Mel External Link/Members Only

Saw her yesterday for an hour. Small studio flat in well known serviced apartments close to South Kensington tube. Comms through text were initially good, but got a little more irksome closer to booking. This was due to back to back bookings (her admission). She also wants new punters to call from outside a nearby restaurant / cafe as she doesn't see black clients apparently. Whatever, her choice, but if that's the case she should say so before hand and on the profile.

Anyway a few minutes after we were supposed to meet I made my way through the door and was seriously impressed. To me, Mel is one of the most stunning looking WG's I've ever met. To add to Jason's description of her I thought (and this is subjective obviously) she reminded me facially of a younger slightly slimmer Sofia Vergara. Anyway if you see her you won't be disappointed by her looks.

Service wise after the usual formalities we got down to business. Kissing was light and lips only, no tongue, but she does kiss you all over your body. OWO I found to be OK, nothing amazing, no DT (I'm not big), but it was nice slow and sensual with ball licking. The combo handjob whilst sucking the head was good. She responded well to RO and seemed to enjoyed it, which is good enough for me.

Sex in a number of positions was good, she was enthusiastic and responded well and gave a good impression of enjoying herself. Outside of the action the conversation was good, but only slightly limited from her lack of English, she's learning quickly. There was a fair amount of clock watching and time wasting tactics, so if you're less passive than me beware.

If you want a fairly vanilla service with truly stunning girl, then go for it. I would recommend her for that. Personally I won't repeat unless she ups her game, but I am a bit of a filthbag, and to be fair to Mel, she mostly met expectations. The lack of DT, FK and CIM which are on her likes marks this down to a neutral, but everything else stops this from being negative.

Offline SWLondon

I got shot down for a similar review.  She is pretty but there are other fit girls out there, and will offer more on service.  Thanks for inadvertently backing me up!   :drinks:

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Excuse me SWLondon, I don't think your review was similar.  To point, you made the claim that you had punted with more attractive girls then failed to back this claim up with any substantive evidence or recommendations. 

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I got shot down for a similar review.  She is pretty but there are other fit girls out there, and will offer more on service.  Thanks for inadvertently backing me up!   :drinks:

I cant see a review on this WG in your reviews on here.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Well it's about time I did a review. As an aside is there a statute of limitations on how recently you've seen a girl and writing a review? Have seen plenty so far this year and haven't reviewed any of them yet.

So on to Mel External Link/Members Only

Saw her yesterday for an hour. Small studio flat in well known serviced apartments close to South Kensington tube. Comms through text were initially good, but got a little more irksome closer to booking. This was due to back to back bookings (her admission). She also wants new punters to call from outside a nearby restaurant / cafe as she doesn't see black clients apparently. Whatever, her choice, but if that's the case she should say so before hand and on the profile.

Anyway a few minutes after we were supposed to meet I made my way through the door and was seriously impressed. To me, Mel is one of the most stunning looking WG's I've ever met. To add to Jason's description of her I thought (and this is subjective obviously) she reminded me facially of a younger slightly slimmer Sofia Vergara. Anyway if you see her you won't be disappointed by her looks.

Service wise after the usual formalities we got down to business. Kissing was light and lips only, no tongue, but she does kiss you all over your body. OWO I found to be OK, nothing amazing, no DT (I'm not big), but it was nice slow and sensual with ball licking. The combo handjob whilst sucking the head was good. She responded well to RO and seemed to enjoyed it, which is good enough for me.

Sex in a number of positions was good, she was enthusiastic and responded well and gave a good impression of enjoying herself. Outside of the action the conversation was good, but only slightly limited from her lack of English, she's learning quickly. There was a fair amount of clock watching and time wasting tactics, so if you're less passive than me beware.

If you want a fairly vanilla service with truly stunning girl, then go for it. I would recommend her for that. Personally I won't repeat unless she ups her game, but I am a bit of a filthbag, and to be fair to Mel, she mostly met expectations. The lack of DT, FK and CIM which are on her likes marks this down to a neutral, but everything else stops this from being negative.

Admin recently posted punters can do reviews on WGs they have seen in the past and others will then judge the use of those reviews.

d00fer

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Admin recently posted punters can do reviews on WGs they have seen in the past and others will then judge the use of those reviews.

Thanks smiths, will add some more reviews even if they sink to the bottom of the pile.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Thanks smiths, will add some more reviews even if they sink to the bottom of the pile.

If the WG is still working such a review or reviews might help punters. :thumbsup: