Not a troll, sorry if I upset you.
I'm just defending that generalisations are common in many conversations and are taken and understood for what they are. They can be used, including in this case.
You said "Do you call guys out when they say that Romanians provide shit service?" my reply was "yes people do get called out when saying that" I added that they are known for providing a shit service though I did post links to show that you can't generalise and say all Roms are bad.
But saying that Romanians often offer shit service and that it's something they're known for (which is what you wrote), conveys the same sentiment as saying "Romanians offer shit service" (a generalisation).
So that's why I said that you had agreed with it and that it makes sense to say it, cause saying it one way might be more exact, but if you read the generalised statement for what it is really, you get the same info. Romanians have a reputation and often provide sub-par service, but obviously and as with every generalization, you can expect there to be exceptions to it.
You can't generalise on how escorts run their business because there's too many variations. You can't generalise on why escorts become or stay as escorts there's too many variations, some do it for money I know of one who did it for the sex, money being a bomus. You can't generalise on prices, there's too many variations, there's even been reports of price reductions.
So I apply the same logic to this, yes there's variation, yes some might even have put their prices down, and that one you know does it for the sex.
That doesn't mean that I can't say that prices, generally, have gone up. And that girls generally, usually, work towards a monetary target.