Author Topic: Polish Sara - Oxford (Nov2022)  (Read 4530 times)


75 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5646009) (67 positive, 4 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline Lecoamraam

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Polish Sara, just excellent service every time. My favourite at this moment.

When: 25 November 2022
Where: Oxford - Headington
Cost: 140 for 1 hour and 30 for CIM
 
Comms: As a regular client, all comms are done through text, followed by a booking on the AW system to secure the opportunity for the feedback pleasantries.

The Lady: Sara is just a lovely young woman. Tall, can (barefeet) almost look me straight in the eyes (180cm), slim with a beautiful figure. Nice soft bum and two big enhanced knockers. I think they fit her nicely because I love big boobs. It is the absolute maximum she should go though. She could have easily had them a bit less and still generate a big wow from me.
Personality wise I concur with some that, in the initial meets, she came across a bit shy or reserved, but that is all gone now. Fun, sweet and witty.

The Meet: after booking a few days prior, my schedule on the day was fucked over by work-boss. I had not anticipated meetings and lots of travel so was running a bit late. I texted Sara to let her know and she was totally cool with it.

Once in Oxford I parked at StLeonards Car Park, just like earlier in the summer. From there easy directions to her house. She opened the door, which was right on the street in a residential area. Not very discreet, more like hiding in plain sight.
Inside, up the stairs, admin sorted and a quick shower. Sara warned me to keep door closed as there was another girl working there. This must have been Vanessa (AW3770295) as Sara had mentioned working with her before. There were some succulent sounds to be heard from the other room...

We met back in the bedroom, which was fit for purpose with a good size bed. Sara uses Disney or other children-themed duvets on the bed, which makes me chuckle. I hope that next time she’ll put Ariel or Belle on, so they can get a good facial, lol!

The play began with her entering the room with her friendly “hello” and then standing making out, stripping of lingerie and moving the action to the bed. She likes full on DFK throughout the booking, another very big plus for me. Her oral is great, not deepthroat, but certainly given with great enthusiasm and she will not relent until it is done and dusted.

I think she likes to receive as well as she happily engages in RO and 69. Although I’m never sure what it does for her sexually as her physical feedback is hard to read. But just being up close to her picture perfect pussy is great.

The sex began with me in missionary, as deep as I could (doesn’t mean much as I’m not such a big lad) but body to body, full snogging. She is really tight. Then CG, where she can angle and squeeze even more, this might be her secret weapon.
We ended sex in doggy, just nice full slapping and pounding. Unfortunately I wasn’t going to cum from rubbered sex.

So back to oral and me helping out a bit by hand, eventually let to me ejaculating twice in Sara’s mouth and with at least orgasming once. It took a quite a while, as my dick was misbehaving, but at no moment were there any exasperated sighs, or looks. Sara went through a solid lower-arm and neck workout getting me off. I guess that was her mission and she went for it, and that is why she is just great.

After the cleanup we chatted for a while, actually picking up from earlier talks, before goodbyes and out. We overran on this one, which I normally try to avoid.

Conclusion: this was my fifth visit to Sara, which I am not going to review all here. Suffice to say she has not let me down before and I think it will only get better. Therefore a solid POSITIVE for this one (and the other four as well).
 
Would I recommend: YES, I think Sara might just be one of the best “vanilla” GFE experiences out there.

Would I return: YES. ASAP

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,619
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Cheers for the reviews. Any reason you're posting the exact date? Do you want them to know who you are?

Offline Lecoamraam

I post the date because they are a bit further back in the past. If they appear on top of the list, it could be confusing for punters if they are from longer ago. I only recently joined the forum, so will post some more reviews from the past.

I guess the SP’s could identify me from my username if they wanted to.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,619
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
I post the date because they are a bit further back in the past. If they appear on top of the list, it could be confusing for punters if they are from longer ago. I only recently joined the forum, so will post some more reviews from the past.

I guess the SP’s could identify me from my username if they wanted to.

Your username is the same? :dash:

Are you not concerned about linking the 2 accounts or do you just not care?

Yes, a time stamp of some sort is important, but what is wrong with saying November 22? What happens if the SP takes offence for some reason at the review yet you had planned to do a return visit? What happens if it's a negative review and the SP has personal details of yours that she threatens you with?

Offline Lecoamraam

Quote
Are you not concerned about linking the 2 accounts or do you just not care?
"

Not too fussed about it atm. The ones I have seen are all trustworthy enough. But, you have a point ofcourse. I will reflect on it. :hi:

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,619
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
"

Not too fussed about it atm. The ones I have seen are all trustworthy enough. But, you have a point ofcourse. I will reflect on it. :hi:

 :lol: you should read up on Bex.

Offline contentguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,447
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
:lol: you should read up on Bex.

That’s cryptic Fuzzy, do tell  :D

To the OP, it’s ok not being ‘fussed’ at the moment.
But when you are ‘fussed’ you’ll wish you followed Fuzzy’s advice.

For example, what if an SP you leave feedback for on AW and a review here, takes issue with the review and either blocks you or decides to mess you about next time.  (How dare you say I’m a size 14, I’m a slim size 10 and my 15 year old pics prove it!  :diablo:)

I’d recommend changing your nick on AW.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 08:02:15 pm by contentguy »

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,619
  • Likes: 133
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
That’s cryptic Fuzzy, do tell  :D

To the OP, it’s ok not being ‘fussed’ at the moment.
But when you are ‘fussed’ you’ll wish you followed Fuzzy’s advice.

For example, what if an SP you leave feedback for on AW and a review here, takes issue with the review and either blocks you or decides to mess you about next time.  (How dare you say I’m a size 14, I’m a slim size 10 and my 15 year old pics prove it!  :diablo:)

I’d recommend changing your nick on AW.

Let's just say it's been shown on here a few times that she's not all sweetness and light.

A concern is that if a punter is happy to be known to SPs that he favours, then any objectivity in reviews may be clouded.

Offline contentguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,447
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 41

A concern is that if a punter is happy to be known to SPs that he favours, then any objectivity in reviews may be clouded.

Indeed, another good reason for a different nick on here and on there.

Offline Lecoamraam

Good calls from all. I'll take action ASAP.

Online timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,342
  • Likes: 89
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Good calls from all. I'll take action ASAP.

Would you like the date removed ?

Offline Lecoamraam

Would you like the date removed ?

Yes please, they are in title and in reviews themselves. If they could be changed to month/year that is accurate enough.

Offline pythago

Although I’m never sure what it does for her sexually as her physical feedback is hard to read.

Her spoken feedback is even harder to interpret. Asking for change of position she often commented with a quite technical "ok".
And sometimes when I enjoyed myself she'd ask "Are you ok?", again a somewhat technical comment.

Ready for the new year, she put her prices up now: 100hh. I believe the last change was just a year ago 90hh from previously 80hh.

This ruins it for me, technical comment "not ok"  :dash: .

Offline pythago

I can see that her price went down to 90/hh.
The increase might not have paid off or it depends on location (although London right now).

I might have mentioned previously, that she also started much more clock watching than she did at the very beginning when I saw her. It's a bit too obvious and a mood killer. You might also get an annoying comment "You only have half an hour". Longer meets might pay off better in this case, but who knows.

Offline Lecoamraam

I've just seen her and on the price change she mentioned that it had caused confusion with some regulars that normally not book through AW and that she was having trouble keeping track of it all. Therefore, she decided to revert to old prices. Whether they would go up at a later time she did not mention, nor did I ask.

On your clock watching, I can only say this. There was none during my booking, and none in my other visits, but they have been an hour or longer and I almost always just go for one pop as I do not want to rush the sex (quality over quantity for me). How things are when trying to get the maximum out of a booking with Sara, I could not tell.