Author Topic: TEEN BABY - Nottingham [TOFTT]  (Read 2937 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7032316) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by JD1]

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
External Link/Members Only

Not one of my proudest moments, but here we are...

Spotted this profile, it actually had more photos on previously. Liked the look of the girl, expensive, but thought I'd go for a quick 15m booking and see.

Price paid: £80 for 15 minutes.

Comms: Decent comms via SMS, quick replies, room number sent over promptly on arrival.

Location: Popular hotel by the train station, pay and display parking available outside, other car parks within a few mins walk. No key cards needed for the lifts.

The girl: Pretty girl, probably not as young as claimed on the profile, I would guess early twenties. Dressed casually on arrival wearing a vest and cargo pants (more on this later).

The action: Opened the door and could immediately tell she is new at this - I'm used to girls hiding behind the door and trying to usher me in as quietly as possible whereas she swung the door wide open and greeted me immediately. Nice looking girl. Exchanged funds and chatted a little bit, confirmed she has only been doing this a few weeks and says she is busy with bookings so far. Asks me to take off my trousers which I do, she takes off her top revealing some nice perky boobs (D cup or so) and gets straight into some OWO. Fairly good technique, not massively deep, but was nice and delivered with enthusiasm. After a few minutes of this I asked her for a condom at which point she claims we only have a few minutes left, I check what the time is and we still have nearly 10 mins left, she apologises and says she was confused about what time the booking started. Gives me the condom to put on and takes off her trousers while I'm doing this. Once her trousers are off I notice her legs are covered in scratch marks and bruises. I suspect I know what this is from, but will leave you to form your own opinions. Maybe I'm wrong, but this got into my head, and really I should have walked at this point but I'm ashamed to say I went ahead. Pumped away and filled the condom as quick as I could, went to the bathroom and washed and left.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2022, 09:42:55 pm by JD1 »

Offline NickyBobby


Offline ZeroCount

I feel like I'm being super dense here, but what would bruises and scratches on legs mean, in terms of something that a girl should be avoided for? All I'm thinking is that maybe she's into BDSM type stuff?

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
I feel like I'm being super dense here, but what would bruises and scratches on legs mean, in terms of something that a girl should be avoided for? All I'm thinking is that maybe she's into BDSM type stuff?

It looked like she had been scratching at herself over a period of time, deep painful looking scratches, some new, some old. This can be a sign of substance abuse. There could of course be other reasons for this and I cannot say for sure the reason for these marks.

Offline GoldTop

I see the AW fluffies are out in force - already has 2 positives. I'd rather trust JD1

Offline GoldTop

It looked like she had been scratching at herself over a period of time, deep painful looking scratches, some new, some old. This can be a sign of substance abuse. There could of course be other reasons for this and I cannot say for sure the reason for these marks.

I encountered similar at a meet earlier in the year. Wasn't completely sure what the story was, and would never suggest people don't book her because of it. But I wasn't down for it. And neither was JD1

Online wantkinkyfun

Thanks for the review. I noticed the profile yesterday and was tempted but the prices put me off. I shall now avoid.

Offline ZeroCount

Ah, I see what you mean now. I was being very dense, thanks for spelling it out for me. Certainly sounds like one to avoid then!

Offline hunkybc

The other photos that were on the profile...were they the actual girl. Wondering why she would take them down

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
Yeah all the photos were her I believe.

They didn’t show too much anyway, I think she is conscious of her privacy.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,159
  • Likes: 583
  •  
  • Reviews: 519
Well it’s just took me 3 hours to convince myself £140 is acceptable and you’ve fucked that up  :lol:

I shall give that a miss for tonight then, the photo did grab my attention to be fair, would have gone last night but the price put me off, it’s a bit top end and then a bit more

Pretty sure a few days day BB was on the list so I skipped I see it’s not there now so assumed she’d ticked to many boxes too quickly setting up the profile.

Thanks for the warning I’ll keep my money in my pocket for now  :drinks:

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
Haha sorry mate. :D

Although there’s a few other options showing in Nottingham currently at similar age and price point - not sure where they have all come from.

Offline Cryton123

Im a tad confused here. It sounded like it was going ok until you saw the bruises and scratches?

So the negative is based purely on her physical marks? If so that seems a little harsh to me.

Your experience your review but seems like she didn’t do anything wrong and had a decent enough attitude  :unknown:

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
Im a tad confused here. It sounded like it was going ok until you saw the bruises and scratches?

So the negative is based purely on her physical marks? If so that seems a little harsh to me.

Your experience your review but seems like she didn’t do anything wrong and had a decent enough attitude  :unknown:

Correct.

If the marks are from something innocent then I have been unfair.

If they are what I think, then I do not wish to see SPs like that.

Offline Cryton123

Correct.

If the marks are from something innocent then I have been unfair.

If they are what I think, then I do not wish to see SPs like that.

So it is harsh then because you could well be wrong in your assumption?

And I’m not here to argue or cause beef, just saying as I see it  :hi:

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
Deleted my previous comment as I no longer want to discuss this. People can form their own opinions and I do not wish to speculate any further.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 06:00:38 pm by JD1 »

Offline GoldTop

So it is harsh then because you could well be wrong in your assumption?

And I’m not here to argue or cause beef, just saying as I see it  :hi:

Not here to cause beef either. But in a review dated October 15th 2021, you wrote "And she had the look of a girl who’s done a lot of substance abuse over the years and it’s now started to take its toll. Couple this with some pretty awful amateurish tattoos and I wasn’t attracted to her at all.  And I’m not saying she is a druggy, and I saw no evidence but she definitely had the ‘look’.

Both you and JD1 are offering a fair opinion - neither stating facts. Not sure why JD needs challenging when you said similar?

Offline Cryton123

Not here to cause beef either. But in a review dated October 15th 2021, you wrote "And she had the look of a girl who’s done a lot of substance abuse over the years and it’s now started to take its toll. Couple this with some pretty awful amateurish tattoos and I wasn’t attracted to her at all.  And I’m not saying she is a druggy, and I saw no evidence but she definitely had the ‘look’.

Both you and JD1 are offering a fair opinion - neither stating facts. Not sure why JD needs challenging when you said similar?



Wow, check you out Sherlock! I’ll answer your question seems as you’re so activated by my comments you found the need to go digging.

The reason mine was a solid red is because she looked absolutely nothing like her pictures. Not one bit. My negative rating was based 100% on that FACT. Feel free to re-read that review and you’ll see that.

My commment on this review was that despite everything being fine, the rating was based on an assumption.

I hope this answers your question

 :hi:

Offline GoldTop

Wow, check you out Sherlock! I’ll answer your question seems as you’re so activated by my comments you found the need to go digging.

The reason mine was a solid red is because she looked absolutely nothing like her pictures. Not one bit. My negative rating was based 100% on that FACT. Feel free to re-read that review and you’ll see that.

My commment on this review was that despite everything being fine, the rating was based on an assumption.

I hope this answers your question

 :hi:

it does thanks. You both offered an opinion. neither is wrong


Offline Dipper

I’d just say to file under ‘off putting skin abrasions..’

Offline JD1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 917
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 98
I’d just say to file under ‘off putting skin abrasions..’

Yep, that is the facts of the matter. Anything else is speculation and not worth discussing further.

Either way, I wasn’t expecting it and it was enough to put me off, hence the negative review.

Offline Dipper

Yep, that is the facts of the matter. Anything else is speculation and not worth discussing further.

Either way, I wasn’t expecting it and it was enough to put me off, hence the negative review.

No, can’t say I’d find it too appealing either.