Not wishing to add fuel to the flames, but some punters seem to think there is a definitive view on an escort - usually their own - that everyone should agree with. Surely the main value of reviews is that they are all a bit different but enable us to form an overall picture to help us make a decision, accepting that our own experience will not precisely match any of the others. Why don't some punters get this?
A read back through Lara's reviews makes it clear there were problems with hygiene in the past, but no recent complaints, so she appears to have sorted it out. From the number of recent comments she clearly struggles to respond to the volume of requests she gets and probably ignores calls when her diary is full. Maybe she could manage this better. Take this all into account when you decide whether to contact her.
Apologies if I sound like a sanctimonious twat, but it seems simple to me. If you don't like the sound of her reviews don't book her. If you try to book and get messed about, tell the rest of us about it and cross her off your list. Simples.