Author Topic: Keysha-sha - Bath  (Read 2319 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5469715) (4 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by contentguy]

Offline night5ky

Had a 1hr meet with Keysha-Sha just outside Bath this afternoon. (External Link/Members Only)

Despite previous reviews about her awful comms, it wasn't actually that difficult to arrange a meet. We exchanged a few messages on AW then she asked me to text her as it's easier for her. A few more texts and a booking was agreed for the following day.

She sent me a postcode which was about 20 minutes from Bath, and asked me to text her when I was 10 minutes away so she can send me send the full address. I was actually running 10 minutes early so text her when I got there, and she then sends me to an address in the next village. No bother though, a few minutes through some country lanes and I was there. The street was very residential, lots of houses and people about so I was worried whether people would know why I was there, but Keysha was waiting the other side of the door as I knocked, so I was very quickly inside without any uncomfortable waiting around.

She states her age as 44, and she certainly looks good for it. Could easily pass for mid to late 30s. Whether it's the girl in the pics I can't be sure, but the body matches. She's really short and has great boobs. There's a niggling question in my mind as to whether Keysha-sha is actually one person or several different girls in rotation. Earlier reviews mention small boobs and no tattoos. This girl had several tattoos, some old and faded, and very ample tits. Other reviews also mention her giving oral, but she told me she didn't do that. Whether there's a bit of switching going on here I'm not sure. It's possible.

She took me upstairs, took my money (£120 for the hour), and then asked me strip off and lay on the bed for a massage. She takes off her dressing gown and she's wearing just a black thong. Nice body, great tits. No kissing though unfortunately. The massage was definitely nothing to write home about. Just 10 mins of routine pulling and pushing skin around, but it wasn't bad. She then flips me over, gives the balls a bit of attention and then goes into a handjob. I wasn't fully hard yet though and she told me "she didn't suck dick", so she asked if I wanted to do anything to her instead. I got her to lie down and went down on her. She got really into that and came quite a few times in about 15 minutes or so, and by this point was absolutely soaking wet. She then grabs a condom from somewhere and rolls it on me and we go into missionary. A good 10 minutes or so of this and then we go into doggy for another 10 minutes. There's only about 5 minutes left by this point so she suggests letting me finish with a hand job. Unfortunately her hand job skills are a bit too keen, she was very fast and aggressive where I'd much prefer a much slower and sensual HJ. The meet ended without a pop for me, as her next client was practically blowing up her phone and we had to end it bang on time.

I'd still say positive though. She's a nice girl, friendly, looks good, and was very reactive and vocal during oral and sex. I'd be happy to go back. Just a shame there's no kissing and she doesn't give oral.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2022, 04:22:26 pm by night5ky »

Offline bdyno

So to summarise....
  • B&S (certainly no tattoos visible on the AW profile)
  • Didn't provide advertised services
  • Not very good at some of the services she did provide (massage & hand job)
  • Clock watcher
  • Runs a 1 in 1 out conveyor belt

But still positive?  :unknown:

Offline night5ky

So to summarise....
  • B&S (certainly no tattoos visible on the AW profile)
  • Didn't provide advertised services
  • Not very good at some of the services she did provide (massage & hand job)
  • Clock watcher
  • Runs a 1 in 1 out conveyor belt

But still positive?  :unknown:

Yeah :D Sounds weird I know, but I was still happy with the meet. Good looking girl, a good fuck, and really reactive too. Yeah it could have been better, but more positives than negatives for me.

There are some tattoos just barely visible on a couple of her main profile pics.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2022, 04:36:02 pm by night5ky »

Offline bdyno

I mean obviously it's your review so that's all that counts, but it certainly wouldn't have got a positive from me!!

Offline joninbristol

Definitely sounding like more than one person working under the same profile.
In my review just over a year ago, she had barely B-cup tits, certainly not ample by any stretch of the imagination, and oral wasn't a problem.
And she definitely didn't have any tattoos, faded or otherwise.
Looks like a completely different set of new profile photos, of a much taller girl on her current profile, too.
Must pop in and check, to be sure !
:hi:
« Last Edit: October 31, 2022, 10:04:30 pm by joninbristol »

Offline Palace123

Generous positive, the review didn't sound glowing.

Might be up for a oily lap dance off her though :)
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac