Author Topic: Submissive BBW Whore Market Harborough  (Read 14867 times)


34 review(s) for SubbyBBW (29 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by kuck]

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

Quibble?
It’s a valid question to a point raised that I am sure SB will enlighten me on to help my understanding.
I am interested to understand the theory of 5-10% of the iceberg showing in terms of feedback ratings.

I couldn’t give a flying fuck about this SP. Not my type, but others may find her attractive.

Nor am I really that interested in your allegations against her. As long as she is respectful she can come on here and offer her version, that’s within the rules. Regarding touting, well that’s up to a Mod to decide.

I do think you are out of order accusing established members of posting reviews to counter your negative.
It’s not all about you!

My point is there are clowns on here questioning a review from someone who has been a member 10 years and posted 400+ posts, but a positive some someone with 3 posts who joined 5 minutes ago is all GROOVY BABY!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

I didn’t wanna jump in like this. But are you questioning my review I made on my visit this afternoon.

Well according to the logic of the white knights on this thread, I've posted 450 posts to your 100 and 9 reviews to your 7, so yes apparently that means I do get to question you. Bonus points if I spend an afternoon wading through posts of yours from years ago for selective quotes to make you look a tit.

Does anyone see the problems with this?

Offline Moby Dick

Well according to the logic of the white knights on this thread, I've posted 450 posts to your 100 and 9 reviews to your 7, so yes apparently that means I do get to question you. Bonus points if I spend an afternoon wading through posts of yours from years ago for selective quotes to make you look a tit.

Does anyone see the problems with this?
Give it a rest ...... you are coming across as a bit of a twat!

Offline Aldaman

Well according to the logic of the white knights on this thread, I've posted 450 posts to your 100 and 9 reviews to your 7, so yes apparently that means I do get to question you. Bonus points if I spend an afternoon wading through posts of yours from years ago for selective quotes to make you look a tit.

Does anyone see the problems with this?

I would love to let you have your bonus points.

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,179
  • Likes: 79
  •  
  • Reviews: 103
I'm not implying anything, I'm outrightly stating I find it suspicious that someone with no reviews in months suddenly gets 2 positives after I offered a justified negative. Stop your white knighting and look at things from a logical perspective, it's blatantly obvious what's going on, irrespective of where the 'reviews' are coming from.

To defend her, you have to ignore her obvious touting alone which should constitute a ban - funny that you're ignoring that.

Now you are accusing me of being a WK - well you can fuck right off.  I am defending two UKP members from your unfounded accusations.  That is the only point I have made here - I have no interest in the WG.  Although my opinion of you is fast falling.

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,708
  • Likes: 540
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
Quibble?
It’s a valid question to a point raised that I am sure SB will enlighten me on to help my understanding.
I am interested to understand the theory of 5-10% of the iceberg showing in terms of feedback ratings.



It's something anecdotal that came out of discussions on one of the forums years ago, possibly UKE and was a rough approximation to the real feedback rate (not the review rate). Of course it varies depending on how vigilant the girl is in policing it, or whether there's a management appointed spamming team in place - as in this case. Fake feedback a.k.a. profile enhancement is all part of their service

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,638
  • Likes: 734
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
My point is there are clowns on here questioning a review from someone who has been a member 10 years and posted 400+ posts, but a positive some someone with 3 posts who joined 5 minutes ago is all GROOVY BABY!!!!!!!!!!!
You've been here 8 years not 10, Aldaman, who you are accusing of posting a fake review has been here 10 years.

By that fact you have outed yourself to this SP when she said she couldn't remember you it looks to me like you are using UKP to get a free booking.

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

You've been here 8 years not 10, Aldaman, who you are accusing of posting a fake review has been here 10 years

By that fact you have outed yourself to this SP when she said she couldn't remember you it looks to me like you are using UKP to get a free booking.

Lol I wouldnt meet this fat miserable individual again if she paid me. My previous posts were calling out how embarrassing and pathetic her 'im so sorry I'm shit, have a free punt' posts are - and the fact they are being allowed to stand on here.

This thread appears to be operating in a parallel universe of logic and reason. I had a shit punt, I've pointed that out. I've also pointed out her obvious touting and the various 'strange coincidences' related to her, and  instead of taking action, people repeatedly shift the goalposts to turn things back on me.

Back in my day, this place was on the punter's side. Feels a lot more now like 'an old forum that you're not allowed to name on here now' which degenerated in to white knight's paradise.


Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,638
  • Likes: 734
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Lol I wouldnt meet this fat miserable individual again if she paid me. My previous posts were calling out how embarrassing and pathetic her 'im so sorry I'm shit, have a free punt' posts are - and the fact they are being allowed to stand on here.

This thread appears to be operating in a parallel universe of logic and reason. I had a shit punt, I've pointed that out. I've also pointed out her obvious touting and the various 'strange coincidences' related to her, and  instead of taking action, people repeatedly shift the goalposts to turn things back on me.

Back in my day, this place was on the punter's side. Feels a lot more now like 'an old forum that you're not allowed to name on here now' which degenerated in to white knight's paradise.
Back in your day?? would that be the time when your first post was asking how to get discounts from escorts?  :unknown:

To reiterate who is it exactly you are accusing of posting fake positive reviews.   :unknown:

As far as the escort is concerned she has only just joined and has admitted that she is 'feeling her way round' the rules have benn pointed out to her and as long as she abides by them going forward there is no problem.

This site still is very much a punters site with the main focus on the punters, however we now try to make it a friendlier place to be with the emphasis on helping, guiding and encouraging posters rather than the more misogynistic way it was in 'your day'.

Offline EllsBFA

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 27
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
…..well, she’s off my Hotlist! 😉
Banned reason: No reviews in 6 years
Banned by: 90125

Offline Charlie Chalk

Well, that escalated quickly! Not quite sure how we’ve got to this point, other than the OP taking a bit of a huff to being questioned about his apparent lack of consistency in some of his posts.

TBF OP, you’d probably help your cause if you would remind us how long you’ve been on here and how many posts you’ve made, it would help us no end to choose which side we should take…

Offline Submissivebbwwhore

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 28
  • Likes: 1
  •  
I go to work for a day and come back to madness.

I find it funny how you’ve messaged me on here Jeff asking for the free punt but “wouldn’t see that fat miserable” me if I paid you. Sadly I wasn’t able to reply to you because I’m only limited to a certain amount of emails a day. If you would like to message me on adultwork so I can put user name to your face that would be fab because I have absolutely no idea who you are. If anything you reallly remind of my ex husband.

I am sorry you had a shit time, I’m
More than happy to see you for a free punt. And the reason why positive bookings are probably coming up is because the people who have seen me think this doesn’t sound like me at all.

Banned reason: Constant touting/up selling/self promotion regardless of previous warnings.
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Jeff_withpetersen

I go to work for a day and come back to madness.

I find it funny how you’ve messaged me on here Jeff asking for the free punt but “wouldn’t see that fat miserable” me if I paid you. Sadly I wasn’t able to reply to you because I’m only limited to a certain amount of emails a day. If you would like to message me on adultwork so I can put user name to your face that would be fab because I have absolutely no idea who you are. If anything you reallly remind of my ex husband.

I am sorry you had a shit time, I’m
More than happy to see you for a free punt. And the reason why positive bookings are probably coming up is because the people who have seen me think this doesn’t sound like me at all.

Not interested but I'll tell you what, how about raffling off that free punt to anyone here who'd actually want to see you. Proceeds to a cancer charity. Sound fair?

In my day SPs weren't even allowed on here, now they're allowed to challenge any and all reviews apparently, egged on by a bunch of white knights who spend their days going over posts I made 7 or 8 years ago in order to supposedly win an argument by taking things out of context or outrightly twisting what was said. Look at this woman's post history, you see every trick in the book - 'im so sorry', 'have a free punt' 'i cried when i saw it' 'noone loves me' 'you are my old husband' lol.

Why bother having the forum at all, clearly any and all negative reviews are just the work of a bitter ex husband  :dash: :dash:

Offline Puntingdaveuk

I’ve just read through the entire thread and on balance I have to side with the OP. It’s his review and his opinion, just like every single review on here. If we all fancied the same SP, this forum would be a very boring place. Why question the negative, or does that mean every negative which I or others post will be questioned then it may make me question posting them going forward.

Yes SPs can offer an opinion, I agree, but that shouldn’t mean the OP was wrong in the description of ‘THEIR’ encounter.

I have seen some SPs who were, in my opinion, absolutely awful, even when they’ve been positively reviewed on here - hell we all have! New accounts with certain review types are by all means potential red flags, but not from someone who’s been on here for some time.

Peace to all people, relax and enjoy the fun punting life we live.

Offline avb2015

Well 8 years is close to 10 years, just as mid 20s is close to... 35. :crazy:

Was this your first time with a submissive? Genuine question.

She says she is size 20/22, just googled that and yeah wow they're big battleships. So how much bigger are we talking? Girls further away from the norm rely more and more on old pics and jaunty angles to be economical with reality. You should know this with your '10 years and 400+ post' experience.

Perhaps her pics flatter but she really is a size 20-22?

Post 5 does come across a bit suspicious. If it's her or someone touting for her, surely they would know not to drag up this review and instead post as its own positive.

Like Aldaman has done.

Presumably you're ok with his review but not post 5?

Offline Submissivebbwwhore

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 28
  • Likes: 1
  •  
Well 8 years is close to 10 years, just as mid 20s is close to... 35. :crazy:

Was this your first time with a submissive? Genuine question.

She says she is size 20/22, just googled that and yeah wow they're big battleships. So how much bigger are we talking? Girls further away from the norm rely more and more on old pics and jaunty angles to be economical with reality. You should know this with your '10 years and 400+ post' experience.

Perhaps her pics flatter but she really is a size 20-22?

Post 5 does come across a bit suspicious. If it's her or someone touting for her, surely they would know not to drag up this review and instead post as its own positive.

Like Aldaman has done.

Presumably you're ok with his review but not post 5?


That’s what I find funny, I actually think Iv lost weight doing this work. Sex burns calories doesn’t it? Haha.

Post 5 has been proven to be a real review, bes reviewwd another SP who is wel known apparently.

ARgh I just wish I could prove myself on here, post proof photos/FaceTime of of the moderators etc lol!
« Last Edit: September 25, 2022, 11:04:33 pm by Submissivebbwwhore »
Banned reason: Constant touting/up selling/self promotion regardless of previous warnings.
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Moby Dick


That’s what I find funny, I actually think Iv lost weight doing this work. Sex burns calories doesn’t it? Haha.

Post 5 has been proven to be a real review, bes reviewwd another SP who is wel known apparently.

ARgh I just wish I could prove myself on here, post proof photos/FaceTime of of the moderators etc lol!
Post/Reply #5 from anonymousrider is suspect.
His one and only post since joining in 2019.
He your husband ?? .... Lol .... Haha.  :sarcastic:

Offline Submissivebbwwhore

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 28
  • Likes: 1
  •  
Post/Reply #5 from anonymousrider is suspect.
His one and only post since joining in 2019.
He your husband ?? .... Lol .... Haha.  :sarcastic:

Ahh I see!

God no, my husband has absolutely no interest in my “work” sadly.

It’s so annoying, I just want to prove myself. Iv worked my absolute ass off to get the feedback and reviews I have, I genuinely love my job lol.
Banned reason: Constant touting/up selling/self promotion regardless of previous warnings.
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,638
  • Likes: 734
  •  
  • Reviews: 24

That’s what I find funny, I actually think Iv lost weight doing this work. Sex burns calories doesn’t it? Haha.

Post 5 has been proven to be a real review, bes reviewwd another SP who is wel known apparently.

ARgh I just wish I could prove myself on here, post proof photos/FaceTime of of the moderators etc lol!
The only thing you are going to achieve is getting banned. The escorts that last on this site are the ones who come on post a well reasoned, rational rebuttal and leave it at that along with the occasional post on a topic from an escort's point of view. The ones that don't last are the ones who continue to flout the rules.

Just so there is no misunderstanding I'll remind you again.

2 Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude toward punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is neither a chat platform between clients and service providers nor a support site for service providers. All service providers / non-punters must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.

 Site Rules   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0   

Offline Submissivebbwwhore

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 28
  • Likes: 1
  •  
The only thing you are going to achieve is getting banned. The escorts that last on this site are the ones who come on post a well reasoned, rational rebuttal and leave it at that along with the occasional post on a topic from an escort's point of view. The ones that don't last are the ones who continue to flout the rules.

Just so there is no misunderstanding I'll remind you again.

2 Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude toward punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is neither a chat platform between clients and service providers nor a support site for service providers. All service providers / non-punters must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.

 Site Rules   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0


Thank, sorry. Won’t happen again.
Banned reason: Constant touting/up selling/self promotion regardless of previous warnings.
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,638
  • Likes: 734
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I’ve just read through the entire thread and on balance I have to side with the OP. It’s his review and his opinion, just like every single review on here. If we all fancied the same SP, this forum would be a very boring place. Why question the negative, or does that mean every negative which I or others post will be questioned then it may make me question posting them going forward.

Yes SPs can offer an opinion, I agree, but that shouldn’t mean the OP was wrong in the description of ‘THEIR’ encounter.

I have seen some SPs who were, in my opinion, absolutely awful, even when they’ve been positively reviewed on here - hell we all have! New accounts with certain review types are by all means potential red flags, but not from someone who’s been on here for some time.

Peace to all people, relax and enjoy the fun punting life we live.
My issue isn't with his review, that's his to rate as he likes, my issue is the accusations he's making against other members and the site in general along with what he appears to believe are his rights due to how long he has been a member and the 'substantial' contributions he has made.

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,179
  • Likes: 79
  •  
  • Reviews: 103

This thread appears to be operating in a parallel universe of logic and reason. I had a shit punt, I've pointed that out. I've also pointed out her obvious touting and the various 'strange coincidences' related to her, and  instead of taking action, people repeatedly shift the goalposts to turn things back on me.


I don't think anybody is challenging your review - as has been said times, your experience your review and your grade.  It is your general arse like behaviour such as accusing others of false reviews and being WKs that is pissing off various people.  Perhaps stop being such a drama queen and just quietly reflect on the possibility that you have not approached this in the best way.  You might even grow as a person.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,375
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I’ve just read through the entire thread and on balance I have to side with the OP. It’s his review and his opinion, just like every single review on here. If we all fancied the same SP, this forum would be a very boring place. Why question the negative, or does that mean every negative which I or others post will be questioned then it may make me question posting them going forward.

...Peace to all people, relax and enjoy the fun punting life we live.

None of us are saying he's wrong for writing a neg or that he shouldn't have written it.  Certainly none of us are saying we should all fancy this or any other SP.  Re-read the challenges that have been raised, it seems you haven't understood what's been said.
Most negs (at least on my home board) make sense, no reason to query anything.  Most punters who find an SP to be so unattractive leave.  Those who stay often recognise that things may've gone poorly for them because they weren't feeling it. I've certainly re-written more than one draft after I've reconsidered what's really driving my feelings about it, not just negs either.

Any review, regardless of rating, might be queried by anybody who is confused about any of the "facts" of it.  We often have Neutrals that get other people scratching their heads and they will comment or query.  Those who respond to reasonable queries with irrational behaviour that they double down on tend to raise red flags.

Offline mrkandmrsk

I did look this book this SP before I read the review. She is fairly local and has some services I'd like to try but it's difficult to justify the risk.
Thanks for posting your review of YOUR experience. I too don't post enough reviews and really should make more of an effort considering how helpful they have been to me.

Offline contentguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,450
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
…..well, she’s off my Hotlist! 😉

That's a shame.

Does that mean you won't be reviewing her?

You could have broken your 6 year non-review duck!

Offline GoldTop

That's a shame.

Does that mean you won't be reviewing her?

You could have broken your 6 year non-review duck!

His stone-cold never going anywhere list  :lol:

Offline contentguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,450
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
His stone-cold never going anywhere list  :lol:

I guess he won't be doing any reviews now!