Having met EP and uploaded a neutral review shortly before the OP, then I concur with some aspects of his report eg she does seem arrogant, it was similarly an underwhelming experience, she isn't gym toned and her flat is small and cluttered.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=353352.0But it was definitely default OW, not OWO.
After being bullish and saying he stood by his version etc, the OP then admits at the end that he might have misremembered.
We weren't there so can't say for sure, but given posts from the SP, the OP and other punters, plus her known anti-OWO stance, the most likely scenario is that he got confused with one of 2 other SPs he met around the same time. But punters will make up their own mind based on all the above.
OP this is EXACTLY the arena to debate services as you’re saying you got owo, yet a lot of punters are saying we haven’t had owo and she doesn’t offer it. And now the escort herself has said she doesn’t offer it and didn’t do it in your booking.
So it looks like you’re lying about that for some strange reason. Which makes me wonder what sort of character you are to lie. Not only that but you could damage the escort’s business here. She has stated pretty clearly and yet your lie could cause her a lot of harassment from people now expecting owo. This could end up with some punters going along and then trying to boundary push and put her in an awkward and potentially dangerous situation.
Fine to challenge him over OWO if you've actually met EP but that's already been done and the content and tone of your post, and accusing the OP of
lying and being of poor character makes you seem like a whiteknight.