Live WG Rankings Page

[tp69]

I fully appreciate that there may be a reason that what I'm suggesting may not be either 1) possible or 2) wanted by mods, but thought I'd throw it out there. Please delete if not appropriate.

-----

The new review stats page is fantastic for a variety of reasons. In a similar vein, a page that lists the top 200 WG's in order of the most number of positive reviews would be a great resource for finding gems. Ideally only active ones so perhaps they're only listed if a review has been created within the last 12 months, something along those lines.

May be difficult to add, but would be even more useful if there's a way to add their region. Not their exact town as they may move around etc, but an idea of their location would be even better.

Anyway, appreciate it may not be suitable, so mods, please delete if so.

[PLeisure]

One stats page for the entire country isn't going to offer a representative analysis. It would have to be regionalised to get some fair assessment.
And then there are the WGs that constantly tour the country.

[FiveKnuckles]

Regional 100 list would be interesting.  May even prompt the WG's to (up their game and) ask punters to post a review to work themselves up the list? 

There must be some type of stat already.  The SP's review log has 'Review Score'.
This one has 43-1-0 so must make the London 100? 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=7052

[daviemac]

  May even prompt the WG's to ask punters to post a review to work themselves up the list? 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=7052

That must be one of the worst ideas anybody has suggested on here. Apart from the fact the escort should not know who you are on here or that you are even a member, it would give open season to every lowlife who want to use this site to gain favours with escort.

Just a reminder, anyone found to be using this site as a lever to gain favours or extra services will be banned and don't think that escorts don't report it, they do.

There's been some very notable member banned for that very reason, some with over 100 reviews.

I think some people need to take a step back and just think what they are posting before hitting the button.

Apart from anything else all reviews for AW escort are listed and linked to on the page the link to her advert is on.

Edit

Just to add, escorts report UKP members on ClientEye just for being UKP members.

[Moby Dick]

There used to be something like this on the Puntingwiki but it hasn’t been updated for years.

External Link/Members Only

Not sure how it helps anymore than just scrolling down recent reviews in your region or using the search function on AW.
You pick an SP based on her looks (your type/attraction), type of service and price, not because she has the most number of reviews, i.e. mile after mile of cock.
Having the most number of reviews could just mean she has been doing it for longer, older, more experienced, or operates a conveyor belt (though you would expect some reds).
Admittedly if all green it could mean she knows how to please.

However a league table, up to a point, would give fluffy punters / pimps / SP a motive that wouldn’t necessarily benefit the forum or make it any easier deciding who to punt.

I say up to a point, since there will be some savvy SPs who just don’t need any more feedback or reviews on here or adultwanks. Fresh meat soon turns to mutton.

[FiveKnuckles]

That must be one of the worst ideas anybody has suggested on here. Apart from the fact the escort should not know who you are on here or that you are even a member, it would give open season to every lowlife who want to use this site to gain favours with escort.

I think some people need to take a step back and just think what they are posting before hitting the button.

DM your moderating experience puts us freshers in check.  Agree reviews should be 100% anonymous to avoid influence by SPs.   

You pick an SP based on her looks (your type/attraction), type of service and price, not because she has the most number of reviews, i.e. mile after mile of cock.

+1.   

[Steely Dan]

More folks to update the PuntingWiki pages are welcome.  10 minutes a week from a few is all it takes to have every pages up to date.

A way to give back for those that struggle to review for whatever reason.

[tp69]

Gaming the system is a very good point, and I guess having rankings would increase that happening. I hadn't considered that.

You would think that just the existence of sites such as UKP would cause WG's to up their game and ensure their service is good. Not everyone thinks in that way though.

My thought was more based on the fact that, although I tend to do a lot of research on here, I still come across girls who are well reviewed and yet I haven't come across before - the idea was to make them easier to find. Perhaps my research skills are what needs improving 

[scutty brown]

As we can only index AW profiles any results would ignore many  reviews  and so be meaningless

[tp69]

As we can only index AW profiles any results would ignore many  reviews  and so be meaningless

True. It wasn't so much for the ranking aspect as more just for finding well reviewed girls that you may not have come across before.

Perhaps 'featured high performers' in random order would've been a better idea. Can see why it may cause gaming though which isn't ideal and would require extra modding.

[scutty brown]

True. It wasn't so much for the ranking aspect as more just for finding well reviewed girls that you may not have come across before.

Perhaps 'featured high performers' in random order would've been a better idea. Can see why it may cause gaming though which isn't ideal and would require extra modding.

But there is no way of identifying non-AW high performers