Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Online Harms Bill now targeting Adultwork and Vivastreet  (Read 3290 times)

Offline Markrob87

I just read the British collective of prostitutes site, they are saying Online harms act has been amended to target adverts.
Not sure what this means in practice - Adultwork is offshore so could maybe be ok if the admins are prepared to continue operating.
Even ukpunting might come under attack.
Sorry if this has already been covered in a thread.

Offline Captainhowdy666

Noooooooooo

Start harvesting numbers now.

I was a worried at the start of covid they may ban the ads to prevent close contact breaches so wrote something a bunch of mobile numbers then.

Offline spiralnotebook

It’ll be back to scouring newsagents windows for biro written ads next.


Offline mr.bluesky

It’ll be back to scouring newsagents windows for biro written ads next.

Or cards placed in phone boxes. (Do phone boxes still exist  :unknown:)
Showing my age now  :D
« Last Edit: July 08, 2022, 07:04:09 pm by mr.bluesky »

Offline Dipper

Or cards placed in phone boxes. (Do phone boxes still exist  :unknown:)
Showing my age now  :D

Random graffiti…

Or was that just me? :wacko: :lol:

Online Waterhouse

It’ll be back to scouring newsagents windows for biro written ads next.
“Large chest for sale.”   “French Polishing”

I’ll wager that’s how HP starred out.  :D

Online Waterhouse

Back to The Sunday Sport then. :rolleyes:



Hidden Image/Members Only
I’d  bet a pony he did.  Some hazing dare/prank.  :D


Offline Markrob87

Scary/crazy reading, thanks. It's like they have never used the internet, only an iphone or something.
The way they have exempted email is funny, because criminals never use email /s
Also apparently OFCOM have to produce and update a list of all internet services. Good luck with that, literally millions of forums and chat servers.
Apparently they then have to contact the operators with notices, doesn't matter where in the world they are, if the service can be accessed from the UK then they are fair game. Its a criminal offence to not respond to the notice within 48 hours lol, good luck enforcing that on server operators in North Korea etc. But its a defence to say you didn't get the notice but will help them now honest.... everything about this is impractical/idiotic bureaucracy.
The good news is that OFCOMs powers are limited - the only new criminal offences relate to failing to respond to OFCOM (when first contacted), or failing to provide information if you are a named manager (OFCOM will first ask for a details of a named manager they can contact in future). OFCOM will ask the named manager to produce a risk assessment, and keep records of how much illegal content was found and/or removed from the service. OFCOM could service notices to request changes to be made to the terms of service etc if they "think there is a risk", but these notices can only be enforced with a civil penalty, so even harder to enforce on people outside the UK.
The most stupid aspect is there is no standard defined for the risk assessment. To be honest if I was running a forum and got contacted, my first plan would be to ignore the notice. If they then managed to track me down in person and serve the notice, I would legally have to name a manager, but the risk assessment etc produced later could just be a go-slow / fob off with bullshit operation, and there is little they could do about it, even if I lived in the UK, so long as the "service" was run by a company legally based outside outside the UK, as any civil action would be against the operating company.
The worst OFCOM could do is request ISPs to block my website, but my ISP already blocks tons of sites like ukpunting, so I have to work around it already.
A way to get round the rules completely is just to block UK ip addresses, but then users have to use vpn to access. Maybe if this passes everyone will have to use vpn to access the internet.

Offline PatMacGroin

Solicitors and Barristers will be rubbing their hands with glee at the thought of this new legislation. Oblique enough for  countless billable hours advising and defending thousands of potential clients.

Offline Jayj

I was seeing a very nice lady about 10 years ago, every inch the Courtesan she had a few sugar daddies, not me 😂 she enjoyed a bit of “ordinary” on the side, absolutely loved anal, anyway she had a junior minister amongst her clients (she never named him) might still be in government 🤞🏼 He won’t be backing this 😂, he had taken her to the HP and on several business trips, amongst her favourite stories was one about a speech he gave in the commons, (she was watching from the gallery) he gave the speech with a butt plug she had given him inserted up his arse 😂😂😂


Offline bops909

I just read the British collective of prostitutes site, they are saying Online harms act has been amended to target adverts.
Not sure what this means in practice - Adultwork is offshore so could maybe be ok if the admins are prepared to continue operating.
Even ukpunting might come under attack.
Sorry if this has already been covered in a thread.

Based on reading this I think UKP is in scope.

It's an interesting article with some dark undertones. The people pushing the legislation know it will do nothing at all to impact the big tech companies but will create a huge burden for lots of small and medium sized sites, like SAAFE, Mumsnet, UKP, UK Bikers, Petrolheads and many more groups. As the author puts it "Well, the death of smaller businesses is part of the plan. "

In fact the only winners from this are the big tech companies. Rather than run an independent forum, the only practical option for many is to opt to be inside their ecosystem where their compliance officers carry the burden of the legislation.
...

External Link/Members Only