Six month+ old reviews - any value

[WelshClipper]

I will very soon be running out of my current reviews i.e. seen in the last six months.

However there are quite a few wgs I have seen in 2019 and earlier who are still active.

Is there any value to posting these as topics (not reviews)

OR

Is it better to take a hiatus on posting reviews until I can post more current ones.

Apologies if asked before ....

[Fuzzyduck]

Yes, still some value particularly for SPs with few or no reviews. I would do a one-off post in each of the relevant regional discussion boards listing all the active SPs I want to give feedback on (i.e. all in one post). I'd do a very brief summary (just a sentence or two) to include the date seen (eg. Summer 2019), the AW link and the rating I would have given. Anyone searching should be able to find it.

[signy]

IMO, there can be some value to reports of escorts in the 6-12 month range. Especially if they have few or no reviews on here otherwise, or if your experience has differed from the consensus. However, little point in adding yet another positive to a well reviewed WG. Beyond that time period, and certainly at three years plus, I don't see a lot of benefit.

Having said that, it is your experience; just consider whether you have anything interesting to say.

[daviemac]

I will very soon be running out of my current reviews i.e. seen in the last six months.

However there are quite a few wgs I have seen in 2019 and earlier who are still active.

Is there any value to posting these as topics (not reviews)

OR

Is it better to take a hiatus on posting reviews until I can post more current ones.

Apologies if asked before ....

Why did you not review them at the time?

Personally I don't see the point of posting about an escort you saw 3 years ago, there's too much that could have changed over that period of time and it can give people the wrong impression. She may have stopped some services you had back then. 

[WelshClipper]

I have apologised before. I took a break from ukp for a couple of years.  I have tried to atone in the past year but what is done is done.

However, you have answered my question for which I thank you 

[daviemac]

I have apologised before. I took a break from ukp for a couple of years.  I have tried to atone in the past year but what is done is done.

However, you have answered my question for which I thank you 

You were active on the site during 2019 and ever since.   

[Wood2017]

Why did you not review them at the time?

Personally I don't see the point of posting about an escort you saw 3 years ago, there's too much that could have changed over that period of time and it can give people the wrong impression. She may have stopped some services you had back then.

DavieMac has already answered but his comment in bold I agree with 100%.

Even purely from a physical perspective it might sound like an extreme example but some of these firecrackers with out of this world figured you saw back in 2019 could have had 2/3 kids since, or gotten some OTT garish tattoos etc.

I think a lot can change in 6 months since a meet but 3 years is a very long time!!

[WelshClipper]

You were active on the site during 2019 and ever since.   

Precisely.

My last review was 2016 then I started reviews again in 2019.  I didn’t do a lot through lockdown but posted those that I did.

It is the reviews between 2016 and 2019 that I was asking if I could add as topics. Based on the comments that the sp could have changed, I agree they may be invalid.

[conrod]

I would think they would only be relevant if the WG is currently active.

[sensualencounter]

So long as they’re still working, then I see some value in reviewing them. At least you can vouch that they were genuine or not and whether there were any major issues. Is it really any different to a review made umpteen years ago that’s still up there? They are still valid, still referenced by punters and used when quoting “she’s got 12 positives…”

If it’s an escort that’s not well reviewed, then it’s even more useful. The more information, the better in my eyes.

[daviemac]

So long as they’re still working, then I see some value in reviewing them. At least you can vouch that they were genuine or not and whether there were any major issues. Is it really any different to a review made umpteen years ago that’s still up there? They are still valid, still referenced by punters and used when quoting “she’s got 12 positives…”

If it’s an escort that’s not well reviewed, then it’s even more useful. The more information, the better in my eyes.

He's talking about punts from 2016, 6 years ago. Do you really think nothing will have changed. He could have posted reviews from mid 2018 onwards but chose not to though he did post some in 2019.

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Christ ! 2016?, doubt if most would be around still!..

[WelshClipper]

Christ ! 2016?, doubt if most would be around still!..

There are quite a lot actually, which is why I asked the question.

But what I had not considered is that most of the wgs may have changed body shape or services since that time and so a review would be of little use.

As Daviemac states, I should have done them at the time, but too late now to fix that. 

[sensualencounter]

He's talking about punts from 2016, 6 years ago. Do you really think nothing will have changed. He could have posted reviews from mid 2018 onwards but chose not to though he did post some in 2019.

I didn't say nothing will have changed, of course some things may have changed. And he's already admitted his missing reviews but I wasn't referencing that at all. I merely said that any information is useful.
If it's of no use then why not delete reviews once they are say 3 years old? And before you tell me to take it up with the owners, it's merely a discussion and not criticism.

[daviemac]

I didn't say nothing will have changed, of course some things may have changed. And he's already admitted his missing reviews but I wasn't referencing that at all. I merely said that any information is useful.
If it's of no use then why not delete reviews once they are say 3 years old? And before you tell me to take it up with the owners, it's merely a discussion and not criticism.

A review posted within the 6 moth period is more likely to be fresh in the mind of the reviewer and therefore an accurate description of what went on and it will always be an accurate description that can be compared to later reviews.

The OP has posted 27 reviews since 2016 and that may not be his total number of punts, so unless he has documented each one he wants to post about now I would doubt the accuracy of the detail from so long ago.

However you may think information that may not even be accurate is useful, but personally I don't.

[WelshClipper]

Yes I admit that I missed quite a few reviews back then. I can honestly say that I have posted every punt from 2020 onwards and a good bunch from 2019.

I do keep pretty good records of my punts and my reason for making this post was a positive thing in which I wanted to make some amends for missing reviews on wgs that are still active.

I know posting reviews is a very important part of being a member of ukp. I cannot change the past. I can only move on.

Thanks for all the input. 

[daviemac]

Yes I admit that I missed quite a few reviews back then. I can honestly say that I have posted every punt from 2020 onwards and a good bunch from 2019.

I do keep pretty good records of my punts and my reason for making this post was a positive thing in which I wanted to make some amends for missing reviews on wgs that are still active.

I know posting reviews is a very important part of being a member of ukp. I cannot change the past. I can only move on.

Thanks for all the input. 

You don't need to make amends mate, what's in the past is in the past, you contribute far more than a lot of members.   

[WelshClipper]

Thank you   

[LLPunting]

No need to be meticulous in your self-imposed penance.

Any useful intel on unknowns who are still active would be welcome:
- accuracy of photos (speaks to honesty rather than likelihood of current looks to be similar)
- attitude to the work
- personality, particularly if you thought it fragile and perhaps not suffer well all these years since
- SKILLS
- whether she took pride in her presentation or shagged while in curlers, grubby housecoat and a fag end dropping ash out the corner of her mouth between sucks (do note if the latter is your kink)
- choice of accommodation and approach to tidiness
- approach to hygiene

i.e. anything that might likely still be relevant.

[sensualencounter]

No need to be meticulous in your self-imposed penance.

Any useful intel on unknowns who are still active would be welcome:
- accuracy of photos (speaks to honesty rather than likelihood of current looks to be similar)
- attitude to the work
- personality, particularly if you thought it fragile and perhaps not suffer well all these years since
- SKILLS
- whether she took pride in her presentation or shagged while in curlers, grubby housecoat and a fag end dropping ash out the corner of her mouth between sucks (do note if the latter is your kink)
- choice of accommodation and approach to tidiness
- approach to hygiene

i.e. anything that might likely still be relevant.

+1 well said

[WelshClipper]

I just commented on a review of Pippa who I saw in 2018.

I confirmed that the OP’s experience was similar to mine. In other words she hasn’t changed in 4 years.

I think this is the way I will handle it. Emphasise any changes/similarities to my experience.

 

[sensualencounter]

I just commented on a review of Pippa who I saw in 2018.

I confirmed that the OP’s experience was similar to mine. In other words she hasn’t changed in 4 years.

I think this is the way I will handle it. Emphasise any changes/similarities to my experience.

 

A good compromise. But beware the “why didn’t you review” comments.

[WelshClipper]

A good compromise. But beware the “why didn’t you review” comments.

Oh I've had lots of those. At least now I've dealt with it to the best of my ability. Just looking forward now.

Tbh my early reviews were crap anyway. Got me a rhythm now.