Ok so the guy asks a genuine question and gets shot to shit as a result?
Many of you do have a perfectly good point that there is no way we can take the risk to zero but I've certainly heard more constructive ways of saying it.
Likewise, the lad who pointed out how many punts he's already had but maybe punting king has only just heard of prep?
Questioning his mental health too? The legal minimum protective kit for a motorcyclist is only a crash helmet yet I know riders who literally spend a couple of grand on their gear. and these are not fast riders! Yes, i raise an eyebrow at their chioices because i would make different ones but I would no more question their mental health than I would this guy.
So come on lads, like I say, there are good points made but all this string has done is discourage others from asking questions for fear of the same dirisory responses.
PK - there are risks with using prep (kidney issues i believe) but going to the gum clinic or your gp is the VERY best way to make sure you're given the FACTS. I hear what youre saying about feeling like you're in a confessional cubicle but they're bound by laws of confidentiality so your family should never find out. To counter this, under GDPR you're allowed to request access to your records. This will give you reassurance that nothing has been passed from gum to your gp.
The most important point to take from everyone's comments here are that they correctly point out that there is no zero risk to be had if you're shagging about. While prep is proving very effective in limiting hiv transmission, there are still strains of hiv that have been transmitted to prep users.
If you did indeed go to using prep as well as condoms then it has to be said, you are less likely to catch hiv because perhaps a condom splits. That said, statistically speaking, even if your condom split while shagging a lass who is hiv +, the chances of transmission are still only 1 in 1219 according to the bumf available from the sexual health clinic (see image).
You'll also see from the top table in the image that they would only "consider" a course of pepse (post exposure profylaxis after sexual exposure) which is the same stuff as prep in the event of a condom failure during insertive vaginal sex with a woman who is hiv+.
Again, you should talk it through with a health professional as they would carry out the pre tests before recommending its use but the info I've given is what satisfies me that prep is more than I feel is necessary.
Hope that is useful mate 👍
Hidden Image/Members Only