Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: @twice@is@nice@ (FF duo) - Golders Green  (Read 3583 times)


6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6460565) (4 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
5 review(s) for sexylady@@@@@@ (3 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
4 review(s) for @Erotic@massage@ (3 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Online bookmaker2

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Individual profiles (verification pics available, thanks duo for finding the links)
External Link/Members Only - now brunette
External Link/Members Only - blonde

£260/60m

Comms: arranged day before, prompt replies.

Location: About a 10-15m walk from the station. The entrance is through an alleyway between some shops where you walk past several other homes then up a flight of stairs to theirs. They will phone you to give you directions and monitor you via CCTV. Once inside, all good. The room was quite nice, big bed and giant wardrobe opposite it with lots of mirrors.

The WGs: Both visibly older than their age on the profile, I'd say late 30s or early 40s. The brunette (Vanessa) was the better looking of the two - pleasant face, tall, size 8-10. The blonde I found less attractive - round face, lips look to be done, size 10-12. Both have boobs going south. Friendly demeanour.

Services:
- Some FK to start with, DFK with the brunette. Brunette is the better kisser.
- Lesbian show - the WGs making out, brunette going down on the blonde, 69
- Double OWO, one gives a BJ and the other licks/sucks the balls. Then they swap.
- Sex in multiple positions - CG with one girl sitting on my face, doggy with one girl eating out the other, missionary with one girl sitting on the other's face, etc.
- No condom change when switching between them.
- Would have liked them to be a bit more proactive with the girl on girl action as I needed to direct them a bit.
- Questionable hygiene from the blonde, caught a bit of a whiff in doggy. No issues with the brunette.
- Was slightly annoyed as the blonde asked me a couple times if I was going to finish and seemed a little disinterested. I got the impression the brunette was willing to go on as long as possible.

In summary, fairly good vfm duo on the surface but let down by the blonde. Rated neutral overall - good to tick off the list but I won't return.

Offline PatMacGroin

Thanks for the TOFTT review. At first glance of the profiles I can see why you went for it.

Looking at the duo profile alongside the individual profiles a few more question marks come up. The due profile lists Anal Play and CIM in the enjoys. They're only included in the enjoys lists of one of the individual profiles, but that states strictly no A level or CIM in her blurb. You don't mention CIM in your review, was that discussed with them at all?

Although tbh, based on the details of your review the initial appeal caused by the duo profile has quickly faded away.  :thumbsdown:


Offline PatMacGroin

Just noticed there was a previous review that beat you to the TOFTT. Somehow it wasn't referenced before now. Goldfinch must have been taking a day off. I've rectified that now.

Still a very worthwhile review. Thanks  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: April 18, 2022, 01:42:50 am by PatMacGroin »

Online bookmaker2

Thanks for the TOFTT review. At first glance of the profiles I can see why you went for it.

Looking at the duo profile alongside the individual profiles a few more question marks come up. The due profile lists Anal Play and CIM in the enjoys. They're only included in the enjoys lists of one of the individual profiles, but that states strictly no A level or CIM in her blurb. You don't mention CIM in your review, was that discussed with them at all?

Although tbh, based on the details of your review the initial appeal caused by the duo profile has quickly faded away.  :thumbsdown:

I asked about CIM and facials but they weren't on offer.