Whiteswan and GF - outcall

[Shades]

External Link/Members Only

Saw a review recently for whiteswan (ella) and talked to my girlfriend and she was keen to meet her and play.

Comms were fairly straightforward. I contacted her and laid out the scenario and she was interested. Took a few days to confirm date and time, but i was planning ahead so no rush. Paid 300 for 2 hours.

The lady
She says 38 on her profile, and it seems about right. i think the one face pic is not very flattering and she looks better in real life, but if you were a pessimist, you could thing she was maybe up to 45 years old. We were happy with what we saw.
She is quite tall (5'7 in her profile) and very skinny. If you like your women with curves, so wont be for you.
She has large breasts and big nipples, that she likes to be played with. The one down side is that her breasts are quite saggy, but the up side is it made it easy to grab them and man handle them.
The action
We agree a kind of cuckhold scenario, so she would sit and watch for a while, with limited interaction while i played with my girlfriend, and then i would get her involved later in.
She turned up dressed as requested and had a bag of things. This included pens so we could write on her as we wished. A toy, some restraints, a leash, some nipple clamps and a few other things we did not explore.
She was clearly interested and engaged in the action.
She rimmed me and my gf a lot, and very deeply.
She sucked my cock after fucking my GF in the arse and pussy with no complaints
Lots of verbal abuse
Some writing on her
she licked my GF pussy
she was naturally very wet
limited kissing. Got the feeling she was not that keen on it, but also was not really in keeping with the rest of the tone of the session.
Plenty of vaginal and anal sex with her (protected), and she took a very hard pounding with no complaints
Asked if she could cum several times
finished with CIM, which she swallowed without being asked

summary
Wont be for everyone's tastes, but we both enjoyed her company, and will definitely be seeing her again.
It is clear that she does the job because she likes it, and it allows her to explore her sexual desires, although she fits it around a day job, so is not taking more than a few bookings a week.

[mightymunce]

Lol..
Love the writing on her. What did you write

[Shades]

Lol..
Love the writing on her. What did you write

Sub slut across her chest, and fuck here above her pussy...

[hendrix]

Great review! She's a lot of fun.

[Shades]

Great review! She's a lot of fun.

she mentioned her meeting with you and KDD. Said that she had enjoyed herself a lot with you two, and i agree about the fun comment.

[Macduff303]

thanks for the review - got a meet with her this week booked - can't wait - will report back

[Leffelover]

Great review - and we’re all slightly jealous of your open minded girlfriend!
Did White Swan gape at all after the anal pounding - I’m looking for the kind of debauched session you had, but with wh and re written on each ass cheek…

[Shades]

Great review - and we’re all slightly jealous of your open minded girlfriend!
Did White Swan gape at all after the anal pounding - I’m looking for the kind of debauched session you had, but with wh and re written on each ass cheek…

Sadly no gaping from white swan. Maybe with some poppers and some determined effort she might get there.
As for my gf, yes I am very lucky.

[bonapati]

she mentioned her meeting with you and KDD. Said that she had enjoyed herself a lot with you two, and i agree about the fun comment.

Curious to know how did that conversation start?.

Were you discussing this site or Hendrix - I don’t get SPs randomly discussing JS or GB even though we have seen the same girls several times.

[Shades]

Curious to know how did that conversation start?.

Were you discussing this site or Hendrix - I don’t get SPs randomly discussing JS or GB even though we have seen the same girls several times.

neither. I asked if she had seen any other couples and she references kdd and a man. basic maths from there.

[bonapati]

neither. I asked if she had seen any other couples and she references kdd and a man. basic maths from there.

So she assumed you knew KDD and you assumed the man was Hendrix?

[titanph]

Lucky guy, sounds like a great punt. I’m gonna ping an email to her now and see if we can somehow get something penned in.

[Shades]

So she assumed you knew KDD and you assumed the man was Hendrix?

no

[bonapati]

no

You probably guessed my next question… but the jury will rest now. 😴

[jamiekinkxxx]

You probably guessed my next question… but the jury will rest now. 😴

I must confess, like you, I hate it when WGs and/or Punters talk about other people (whether that be WGs or punters)... discretion is paramount

[bonapati]

I must confess, like you, I hate it when WGs and/or Punters talk about other people (whether that be WGs or punters)... discretion is paramount

100% with you that, I’m sure neither Hendrix or KDD would appreciate the OPs conversation (KDD we know is highly sensitive about being discreet and respectfully so)

Why would the SP mention KDD in the first place? And why would the OP assume the man was Hendrix (he is not the only one who does duos with KDD) and even if he was why would the OP mention amateurishly mentioning here.

So the maths is not basic.

The OP has been in the game long enough to know better. Not sure how long the SP has though.

[OutForJustice80]

100% with you that, I’m sure neither Hendrix or KDD would appreciate the OPs conversation (KDD we know is highly sensitive about being discreet and respectfully so)

Why would the SP mention KDD in the first place? And why would the OP assume the man was Hendrix (he is not the only one who does duos with KDD) and even if he was why would the OP mention amateurishly mentioning here.

So the maths is not basic.

The OP has been in the game long enough to know better. Not sure how long the SP has though.

Definitely agree in principle but a wg revealing she duos with another wg doesn’t constitute a breach of privacy as there’s a business interest there. I have asked other wgs if they have duo partners and they’ve told me their working names, nothing more. To mention another punter is involved is surely a natural assumption and as long as nothing identifying is mentioned there then I don’t see the issue.

[Shades]

100% with you that, I’m sure neither Hendrix or KDD would appreciate the OPs conversation (KDD we know is highly sensitive about being discreet and respectfully so)

Why would the SP mention KDD in the first place? And why would the OP assume the man was Hendrix (he is not the only one who does duos with KDD) and even if he was why would the OP mention amateurishly mentioning here.

So the maths is not basic.

The OP has been in the game long enough to know better. Not sure how long the SP has though.

I am geting bore by this conversation. As mentioned already is it common to mention who else you have worked with. As for the Hendrix link. The only reason i made that link was because of the review made by Hendrix. None of that was mentioned to the WG. Time to move on and focus on fucking rather than trying to pick apart a 30 second conversation that compromised no-one.

[bonapati]

I am geting bore by this conversation. As mentioned already is it common to mention who else you have worked with. As for the Hendrix link. The only reason i made that link was because of the review made by Hendrix. None of that was mentioned to the WG. Time to move on and focus on fucking rather than trying to pick apart a 30 second conversation that compromised no-one.

Sorry to bore you or wake you up but it is NOT a common thing to mention who you have worked with (I hope punting population will prove me wrong though) I have never in my punting days mentioned or discussed another hooker or punter.

It might be 30 second conversation to you but a whole lot of outing to another.

Happy to move as long as you get my gist. There is always a fly on the wall.

[bonapati]

Definitely agree in principle but a wg revealing she duos with another wg doesn’t constitute a breach of privacy as there’s a business interest there. I have asked other wgs if they have duo partners and they’ve told me their working names, nothing more. To mention another punter is involved is surely a natural assumption and as long as nothing identifying is mentioned there then I don’t see the issue.

Agree, but I have not seen any evidence of you mentioning here. That’s the difference. Doing so via PM is still discreet.

[Shades]

Sorry to bore you or wake you up but it is NOT a common thing to mention who you have worked with (I hope punting population will prove me wrong though) I have never in my punting days mentioned or discussed another hooker or punter.

It might be 30 second conversation to you but a whole lot of outing to another.

Happy to move as long as you get my gist. There is always a fly on the wall.

It has ben fairly common for me to have that conversation with an escort about who she has worked with. I have never asked or discussed the person she was working for.

[bonapati]

It has ben fairly common for me to have that conversation with an escort about who she has worked with. I have never asked or discussed the person she was working for.

No worries, it’s all good Shades.