British Sarina - Watford

[KBW1999]

This meeting was yesterday afternoon.

Is it just me, or do the rest of you get horny when the sun's out?

Anyway, I was working and hot and horny, checked if any green lights were on within an hours drive and this one popped up.

Gave her a call, no reply, fired off a text and within 5 minutes had a reply, I think she very expensive, but I had always fancied an Indian lady, so we agreed half an hour for £100.

She gave me the postcode, a well known hotel chain on the outskirts of Watford and off I set. Parked up, fired the I'm here text and nothing, then after 10 minutes I got the call and she gave me very good instructions to find the room as you have to walk right across reception. Knocked on the door and as if by magic it opened with no one there.

Now, this is where it goes downhill, she is very pretty IMHO, but she has a very boyish body with no tits to speak of. She started to moan about how hot it was and how busy she was before the door was closed. TBH that gave me a bad feeling and I should've walked, but the little fella didn't want to.

I asked for a shower and got in, it was a hot day and I'd been at work, she came into the bathroom and continued to moan on and on about how busy she was, anyway out and we went into the bedroom, onto the bed and I tried to kiss her, she pulled away and would only allow LK with closed mouth, so I asked for a BJ and to be honest it was OK, but she kept using her hands, obviously trying to get me to cum quickly so she could get rid of me. So I asked for the mac and started off in doggy, everytime I went deep she grumbled and said it hurt her, by this time I am losing my wood, so I ask for her to wank me off over her tits, which she wasn't happy about but I pointed out the sooner she finished me off the sooner I'd be out of the room.

In and out in just over 15 minutes, £100 wasted, I got the feeling she was a conveyor belt one, so piss poor service, piss poor attitude and a high price, it's a rock solid red from me.

Would I go back, not a fucking chance.

[crfc]

External Link/Members Only

[KBW1999]

Thanks, my appologies I forgot the link 

[simon07]

Certainly touring and price is £180/hr.
Why do girls have so many control issues and poor customer service?

[KBW1999]

In her case I feel very strongly she is only interested in the money, but isn't prepared to put in the effort required, she'll get away with it for a bit longer, but ultimately will have exhausted the punters will to pay for a shit service

[lillythesavage]

In her case I feel very strongly she is only interested in the money, but isn't prepared to put in the effort required, she'll get away with it for a bit longer, but ultimately will have exhausted the punters will to pay for a shit service

She will just tour to a new lot of mugs, only a very small percentage of punters read here,

[KBW1999]

I agree to a certain extent, but with her prices there's only a limited number of punters who'll pay and once they've experienced the shit service they won't be back, I suppose she's hoping to have made her pile by then though

[British_Rina]

Hello everyone,

Rina here, I didn’t actually know whether to reply to this post and post my story, but I will do because I believe this review to be maliciously written, and the events written here did not occur.

First of all, I would never ever complain in front of a client, let alone about how busy I am, I think it’s just unprofessional to do so and a bit skanky to tell a client who has come to see you about how many bookings you’ve had before and after.

Second of all, I’ve never had a problem with anyone wanking over my tits; the only thing I don’t like is on my face!

I have a feeling I know who this man is, but I can’t be sure. It is possible that I may get more  fake reviews/ retaliation from this person , so be it. At least I’ve got this off my chest

[daviemac]

Hello everyone,

You do realise you have brought this negative review from page 12 and out of sight back to the top of the board and to everyone's attention again don't you. 

Perhaps saying less is actually more.

[British_Rina]

You do realise you have brought this negative review from page 12 and out of sight back to the top of the board and to everyone's attention again don't you. 

Perhaps saying less is actually more.

I know, but I don’t mind as people can now hear my point of view.

[norwichfunseeker]

Its quite ironic that she wont see people who have an UKP account, but is happy to use said platform in a attempt to put "her point of view" which IMHO she hasnt, other than just to reply saying this didn't happen - but  im not sure who the punter is!

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=325562.msg3390609#msg3390609

Maybe phone is a bit dusty, possibly following that review who knows?

[British_Rina]

Its quite ironic that she wont see people who have an UKP account, but is happy to use said platform in a attempt to put "her point of view" which IMHO she hasnt, other than just to reply saying this didn't happen - but  im not sure who the punter is!

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=325562.msg3390609#msg3390609

Maybe phone is a bit dusty, possibly following that review who knows?

Norwich I’m not hypocritical, so I will not post on this forum and refuse UKP members at the same time.

[norwichfunseeker]

Norwich I’m not hypocritical, so I will not post on this forum and refuse UKP members at the same time.

But you have - that was my point.

I'll leave the Mods to police the board or course, but personally I think WGs should be encouraged to post on here, as long as its not touting or just a tit for tat reply to a review. Some girls post on here under a pseudonym which is fine (although I believe they have to declare their identity to the mods).  I actually find it quite refreshing to have their insight from another perspective.
your decision not to allow punters from here to see you is of course your choice, but we are not all bad. Personally I think if you give the expected service (ie whats offered) with a smile and enthusiasm thats enough for a positive for me. Its only when agreed services are declined, the girl is not as advertised (Looks / service etc) then its a negative. So if you (as im sure you do) give a decent experience you have nothing to worry about, infact as discussed on another thread, lots of WG's comment on increased bookings following a positive review.

I guess in a nutshell Rina, im quite positive about being a member on here, and it saves me from seeing girls who are more likely to disappoint. I have used this site to do my due diligence and have even travelled quite some distance to see a well reviewed girl, and ive rarely been disappointed in those cases. (one springs to mind, but she made good and I reflected that on here).

As a punter I try to read ALL The reviews - look for other ads / pics etc, before booking. Being totally honest too - one red (or maybe more, depending on the number of green) reviews would not stop be booking a WG. its about context and balance.

Please read and accept that in the spirit it is intended. Personally I think it would add to the benefit of UKP if you did post, and could give an insight into this world from a different perspective. I know the other WG's who post on here do, and im sure they would appreciate another member!   

[British_Rina]

But you have - that was my point.

I'll leave the Mods to police the board or course, but personally I think WGs should be encouraged to post on here, as long as its not touting or just a tit for tat reply to a review. Some girls post on here under a pseudonym which is fine (although I believe they have to declare their identity to the mods).  I actually find it quite refreshing to have their insight from another perspective.
your decision not to allow punters from here to see you is of course your choice, but we are not all bad. Personally I think if you give the expected service (ie whats offered) with a smile and enthusiasm thats enough for a positive for me. Its only when agreed services are declined, the girl is not as advertised (Looks / service etc) then its a negative. So if you (as im sure you do) give a decent experience you have nothing to worry about, infact as discussed on another thread, lots of WG's comment on increased bookings following a positive review.

I guess in a nutshell Rina, im quite positive about being a member on here, and it saves me from seeing girls who are more likely to disappoint. I have used this site to do my due diligence and have even travelled quite some distance to see a well reviewed girl, and ive rarely been disappointed in those cases. (one springs to mind, but she made good and I reflected that on here).

As a punter I try to read ALL The reviews - look for other ads / pics etc, before booking. Being totally honest too - one red (or maybe more, depending on the number of green) reviews would not stop be booking a WG. its about context and balance.

Please read and accept that in the spirit it is intended. Personally I think it would add to the benefit of UKP if you did post, and could give an insight into this world from a different perspective. I know the other WG's who post on here do, and im sure they would appreciate another member!

No Norwich! I think I didn’t come across clearly. I mean now as I am posting on here I am no longer refusing UKP members.

And yes I do understand that this website can help to choose a WG, it’s just I was very upset about this fake review.

[norwichfunseeker]

No Norwich! I think I didn’t come across clearly. I mean now as I am posting on here I am no longer refusing UKP members.

And yes I do understand that this website can help to choose a WG, it’s just I was very upset about this fake review.

Thanks for the clarification, and for those of us that wish to book you, that's good news.

Welcome aboard.

[British_Rina]

Just to follow up, and as alluded to, I have a very strong suspicion I know who OP is and I challenge you to prove the authenticity of this clearly malicious and IMO fake review.

I did not work from a Watford hotel on 17/07/21 and I actually had cancelled that day of incalls due to safety concerns about a potential punter. .

Said punter had tried to book me using 2 phone numbers after I declined him initially which I am allowed to do based on my own discretion.

The details of this review are too fluffy. And are not consistent with when I was actually working. Prove you've actually seen me with some text correspondence that aligns to these dates.

[norwichfunseeker]

I cannot comment on that, and will leave for the mods to deal as they see appropriate.

However as Daviemac said previously, sometimes less is more. Maybe a more timely response would have added some weight to your argument.

As I've said before, I personally like the idea of wgs being members and posting here, but there is much more benefit for all if it's general conversation, and not, as I said previously a tit for tat conversation about a red review.

Now you have opened your bookings for ukp members hopefully more green ones come and this red one moves down the list and gets diluted.

[daviemac]

Just to follow up, and as alluded to, I have a very strong suspicion I know who OP is and I challenge you to prove the authenticity of this clearly malicious and IMO fake review.

I did not work from a Watford hotel on 17/07/21 and I actually had cancelled that day of incalls due to safety concerns about a potential punter. .

Said punter had tried to book me using 2 phone numbers after I declined him initially which I am allowed to do based on my own discretion.

The details of this review are too fluffy. And are not consistent with when I was actually working. Prove you've actually seen me with some text correspondence that aligns to these dates.

I think it is impossible to prove the authenticity or otherwise of any review on here. the review has been posted and you have posted a reasoned rebuttal, members will, as they always do, form their own opinions and take from the thread information they find useful then act accordingly.