Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: BunnyPlayboy Twickenham HJ  (Read 6370 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 2938996) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Fully Sated]

Offline B00bN00b

External Link/Members Only

I’m a vanilla/FBSM type punter. Was passing through the area last week, had the horn and decided I wanted a rub and and tug to help me relax after a shitty day. Unfortunately couldn’t find anything but this profile caught my eye so I thought fuck it, she looks hot.

Comms good. Texted midday, instant response, booked session for mid afternoon.

Directions straitforward, 5 mins walk from the train station, plenty of pubs on the way for a loosener. Or two. Flat located on busy high street by various shops and restaurants. By no means a discrete entrance but not sure anyone really gives a shit what’s going on. And if there’s one positive from this virus bullshit it’s that we’re all wandering around in face masks like fucking ninjas so no one knows who the hell anyone is anyway! Got buzzed in then up 2 flights of stairs to the flat. She let’s me in and straight into an en-suite room. Bit dark but clean and pleasant enough.

Girl, attractive Brazilian with a nice smile and slim but curvy body. Nice tits. Pleasant and friendly demeanour. Perfect English. I’d say the stats on her AW profile are about right.

Sorted 100 quid for half an hour and discussed what I wanted. Now this probably going to annoy a few of you but all I wanted was a fumble with a nice sexy girl while she gives me a handjob. Maybe COVID has made me paranoid but I wasn’t after any kissing, oral or sex. Hence me usually going for FBSM. And I got exactly what I wanted. Played with and kissed her boobs, squeezed her lovely firm bum and she oiled me up and very competently wanked me off. Had her sit on my face for a bit (pants on) while she finished me off. Exactly what I needed. I was in and out in about 25 minutes.

So in conclusion, sexy friendly girl who gave me exactly what I needed. Can’t comment on her other services but for what I wanted she was great.

Cheers.


Offline Fuzzyduck

Cheers for the review. Glad you enjoyed, but £100 for half an hour of fumble and a hand job is a lot, though I do acknowledge your choice of going for minimal services.

Offline B00bN00b

Cheers for the review. Glad you enjoyed, but £100 for half an hour of fumble and a hand job is a lot, though I do acknowledge your choice of going for minimal services.

Cheers. It is more than I’d usually pay but it was a pure supply and demand situation. And I didn’t feel shortchanged.

Offline 69Luvva

Thanks for the review - she's been in my TOFTT list as she's not too far away but looked frankly too good to be true - is that definitely her in the pics - they seemed a bit inconsistent to me which is what stopped me?  Looks like a pretty amazing bod tbh and a great list of services.   :thumbsup:

Offline B00bN00b

Thanks for the review - she's been in my TOFTT list as she's not too far away but looked frankly too good to be true - is that definitely her in the pics - they seemed a bit inconsistent to me which is what stopped me?  Looks like a pretty amazing bod tbh and a great list of services.   :thumbsup:

The glossy professional pics probably not. The others probably. Sorry to sound vague but she is attractive and has decent figure.

Offline 69Luvva

The glossy professional pics probably not. The others probably. Sorry to sound vague but she is attractive and has decent figure.
She has a selfie in her PG - would you say these two are representative?

(Private gallery pictures removed as per rule #29)

« Last Edit: July 17, 2021, 12:18:21 pm by daviemac »

Offline B00bN00b

She has a selfie in her PG - would you say these two are representative?


Similar. Facially/figure looks about right but her hair was darker, straight and tied up in a high ponytail
« Last Edit: July 17, 2021, 12:18:40 pm by daviemac »

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,522
  • Likes: 392
  • Reviews: 24
She has a selfie in her PG - would you say these two are representative?

(Private gallery pictures removed as per rule #29)
Please read and take notice of all the rules before posting again. There's a link at the bottom of every page.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

Offline 69Luvva

Please read and take notice of all the rules before posting again. There's a link at the bottom of every page.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0
Ah - shit - sorry! Had seen gallery pics posted in other reviews and hadn't spotted the distinction with PG pics! Noted!!  :hi:

Offline deek12345

Even if BooNoo was happy with his experience, and was not after FS,the fact that this lady who charges 100/150 for 30/60, ended up with her pants still on for face sitting/RO, does not quite tally with the erotic experience promised by her profile text.

his experience doesn't suggest she throws herself into the session.

One of her profile pics shows RO without panties. For £100 for 30 minutes, i think she should not even need to be asked to be fully naked from the start, unless the punter asked her to stay partly dressed.

Its got to cast doubt on how much she gets into a session.
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fully Sated

Thanks for your TOFFT B00bN00b. She registered with Adult Work in 2015, it has taken her a relatively long time to get her first UKP review. There seems to be only a couple of references to her in all this time;

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=103520.msg1223052#msg1223052
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=177304.msg1873920#msg1873920

Her profile currently states that she is located in Aberdeen.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline B00bN00b

Even if BooNoo was happy with his experience, and was not after FS,the fact that this lady who charges 100/150 for 30/60, ended up with her pants still on for face sitting/RO, does not quite tally with the erotic experience promised by her profile text.

his experience doesn't suggest she throws herself into the session.

One of her profile pics shows RO without panties. For £100 for 30 minutes, i think she should not even need to be asked to be fully naked from the start, unless the punter asked her to stay partly dressed.

Its got to cast doubt on how much she gets into a session.

No mate, I asked her to keep them on. She did everything I asked and nothing I didn’t. She was perfectly willing and pleasant.

Offline deek12345

BooNoo

Fair enough.
Thanks for clearing that up - if it was your choice to have panties on then its fine.
Banned reason: Paranoid troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline yesbby

She’s now £350 for an hour. Not the most stable business model

Offline Fuzzyduck

She’s now £350 for an hour. Not the most stable business model

That seems ambitious. Back down to £150 an hour within a few days I'll wager.

Offline yesbby

That seems ambitious. Back down to £150 an hour within a few days I'll wager.

Assuming it’s a real profile of someone intending to earn a living, I’ll give her til Monday