Pretty Little Girl - Adultwork - London - Canada Water

[Alexmck]

Girl

External Link/Members Only

Price

£200 for 1 hour

Location

Apartment near Canada Water. Nothing in the apartment that was personal other than shower gel and designer hand bag and designer trainers

Comms

WhatsApp

Looks/presentation

Petite and very slender. Fairly flat chested but expected from pictures/page. Very large lips that were mesmerizing for the wrong reasons (for me). Pierced nipples and piercings/studs on parts of her body - chest near collar bones and hands. Nipples would have been lovely minus the piercings but didn't know about before so didn't ask her to remove before

Looked very familiar but not sure why. Site says she is Lithuanian-Swedish. Thought she sounded more Polish but I'm not an expert. Couldn't look at her face properly as I kept staring at her lips. Reminded of a sex doll in a slightly comic way

Thinking back, probably girl next door (step down from attractive girl next door) looks

Services

Apartment - not the best of areas but not there for a walk outside. Not sure I would want to be walking around there once the sun sets. Comms over WhatsApp were good if a little short.

Did the open from behind the door thing. In underwear when the door opened. Was a little awkward of which direction to go when I walked in. Ended up heading to living room and then leaving coat and shoes in there before heading to bathroom. Very strong smell of cannabis in the room.

Given a towel and told to shower. Had just showered before I headed to her but did as I was told and it's something I like to do regardless. Back to the room and she asked for the cash. Handed over and she counted onto the bed. Then onto the activities. DFK with lot of tongue. The mesmerising lips put to good use. Had worse from girlfriends. Underwear set came off and revealed her pierced nipples. Told not to be too rough as they were new. Bit disappointing as normally like to play and tweak them. Then she knelt for OWO. OWO was good although not out of this world. Has a tongue stud but also invisiline that proved to be raking quite a lot and was uncomfortable at times. Suggested a move to the bed. More OWO. Very good, wet and slobbery but the raking continued. When I asked her to try less "teeth" she seemed irritated and said she would try. Didn't make much difference. View was good - large trout pout lips around my cock with some vigorous up and down, just the raking every so often stopped the sap from rising. She did position her body well and was receptive to a finger being slipped inside. Seemed to get wetter the longer oral went on or else my fingers were doing something that was working for her. Also didn't have an issue with hips bucking up and down a little or holding her head. She also explored balls as well as shaft and head with her tongue

Then went down on her. On the way down kissed her nipples but was reminded not to be too rough. Didn't think I was with my tongue but backed off and carried on down. Bit of the urine tang and musky. Seemed to get more wet as tongue went exploring. Got a little more noisy and head grabby. Finger inside and seemingly came after a couple of minutes. Not convinced it was real but hey. Went back up to kiss her and she wriggled her hips out of the way and closed her thighs. Said she didn't want my cock near her pussy without a condom on it. Felt awkward. Gave her a kiss and asked for more OWO. Was nice but the raking was starting to get tiring and annoying. Asked for a condom and she slipped on cowgirl. Slipped in quite easily but didn't seem to want to slide all the way down (locked her legs when about half way in so I couldn't push upward). Started moving and built up some rhythm but found it a bit odd with the half way insertion and locked legs. She seemed to like it though and pulled my hands up to her breasts but they then made contact with her nipples she pushed them away. Had to make do with holding onto her hips.

Then doggie. Slipped in easily and she seemed to enjoy with a little moan here and there. Ended up coming quite heavily and she gave the impression of waiting impatiently for me to finish pulsating. Pulled out and then noticed the condom was quite slippery and covered in something white. Looked like a cream of some sort rather than the fruits of natural female happiness

Showered and then left almost exactly on the hour

Overall was "ok" rather than enjoyable. Didn't seem to click and she was very brusque with me compared to other reports. Upside was that it was above average when it was good but mostly seemed to be below average with some parts being average/just above average. Downside was that seemed to be very business like and brusque when not "in the act". Would I return - no. Ended up feeling a bit like a processed sausage although ultimately that is probably what we are. She said she moved around a lot between Airbnb's and wasn't always offering incalls as she had regulars who liked doing outcalls with her. Maybe I caught her on a bad day or maybe just one of those where we didn't click

[Shadow314]

Thanks for the review OP.
Interesting to see the different perception on service, perhaps not a coincidence it's her only incall review so far.  Rates are also sliding up, £220 incall now.

[Fully Sated]

Looks/presentation

Petite and very slender. Fairly flat chested but expected from pictures/page.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

[Alexmck]

Thanks for the review OP.
Interesting to see the different perception on service, perhaps not a coincidence it's her only incall review so far.  Rates are also sliding up, £220 incall now.

Felt a bit odd experiencing that given the other reviews. Maybe an off day or the cannabis or just didn't click. Guess that's why it's called punting!

[jakkee]

What a shame, she was on the list but this is a little worrying. The raking part in particular I don't want to be too intrustive, but are you larger/wider than average? I'm trying to work out what might be different from other reviews.

[pretty little girl]

Oh hey you. If you think you have a right to chat complete lie about me on here then I think that I have right to tell people the truth and aware other girls about your suspicious actions. Let’s start
First thing first I don’t mind about any review whether it’s neutral or not. As long as as the facts are not made up like yours.
1. I don’t do door from behind thing.
2. I don’t smoke any cannabis either. I have tried in the past but it’s not my cup of tea. Smoking in airbnb apartments is not permitted either( if you don’t know now you know).
3. My pierced nipples are in my private gallery, there’s no way I’d be taken them off just because you haven’t checked my private gallery.
4. I’m not Polish either. Happy to show my passports in person if requested.
5. I’m showering regularly so there’s no way you tasted something else apart my natural juices. Please don’t make it up to put me down.
- [ ] Original agreement was 2 hours for £400. Now heads up. The main your dissapointed was “ She didn’t want my cock near her pussy without condom on.” Why don’t you just tell the people the fact that it was what you were begging for? Asking to rub it? Disgusting. And once I said there’s no way I’ll ever do that as you can get infection easily and my health is my priority you switched to “ Can we do 1 hour then” and asked me to give £180 back ( my 1 hour rate is £220 and never been £200 btw so again not sure what on earth you talking about). You should be overr the moon that I didn’t send you home  and let you carry on with me for this question. Where’s this MAIN part of your review, huh?
- [ ] My reviews speak for themselves. As much as you trying to mess me over now over not letting your bare cock rub in to my pussy, most of my people are happy with my service as I’m really into what I’m doing as I’m naturally enjoying sex.
- [ ] I really hope that karma for this complete lie about what actually happened catches you soon. Also my designer stuff shouldn’t bother you .
- [ ] All the best, PLG x
   
   

[Alexmck]

What a shame, she was on the list but this is a little worrying. The raking part in particular I don't want to be too intrustive, but are you larger/wider than average? I'm trying to work out what might be different from other reviews.

No. Average or smaller than average. Think if it was taken out there would be no raking problem and would have been terrific

[pretty little girl]

What a shame, she was on the list but this is a little worrying. The raking part in particular I don't want to be too intrustive, but are you larger/wider than average? I'm trying to work out what might be different from other reviews.

No he had micro penis ( which is alright as we all are different and I don’t judge people by how big they are ) and kept moaning and telling me how good oral is ( no teething was involved). And that he didn’t have sex for ages. As I mentioned on my post above the thing that pissed him off was that he wasn’t allowed to rib his bare cock in my pussy. He decided to go for an hour instead 2 and asked to give him half of his money back. Really should just have kicked the clown out, my bad. 
His other reviews about the girls look very similar to mine, everyone’s shit, he’s the one who’s unsatisfied lol

[PLeisure]

UKP's popcorn machine auto-function has just kicked into action 

[lillythesavage]

UKP's popcorn machine auto-function has just kicked into action 

Lol, to be fair this is exactly why SP,s should be given the right of reply, would be a very boring and one sided forum otherwise. Of course it is a punter priority platform and SP,s usually hang themselves and get rightly banned.

Not sure the popcorn is going to be required though, 













o

[lillythesavage]

Thanks for the review OP.
Interesting to see the different perception on service, perhaps not a coincidence it's her only incall review so far.  Rates are also sliding up, £220 incall now.

No mate, has been 220 since the first review,, the OP is mistaken with the 200. been on the HL since first review even though incalls were not available the 220 was on profile.

[PLeisure]

No mate, has been 220 since the first review,, the OP is mistaken with the 200. been on the HL since first review even though incalls were not available the 220 was on profile.

Correct. It was £220 outcall; no in-calls initially. That was recently introduced and the in-call rate was £220, with outcall bumped to £260. 

[PLeisure]

Lol, to be fair this is exactly why SP,s should be given the right of reply, would be a very boring and one sided forum otherwise. Of course it is a punter priority platform and SP,s usually hang themselves and get rightly banned.

Not sure the popcorn is going to be required though, 













o

I'm all for WGs having the opportunity to respond. They need to be mindful of the fact that the forum is essentially punter oriented, though.
My comment about the UKP popcorn machine was more directed at OP and any potential for further exchanges between the two.

Let's keep it civil, kids   

[Alexmck]

Think the lady has me mixed up with someone else

Only booked 1 hour. Don't generally beg and don't remember moaning or speaking during oral other than to ask for less teeth

Also, not keen on the rubbing a bare cock into a pussy for the reasons mentioned but find it awkward when the girl squirms and wriggles out of the way or to one side when you start coming up from dining below to give her a kiss

Anyway, that's all I'm going to say before this turns into a Punch and Judy show (with or without the popcorn!)

[pretty little girl]

Think the lady has me mixed up with someone else

Only booked 1 hour. Don't generally beg and don't remember moaning or speaking during oral other than to ask for less teeth

Also, not keen on the rubbing a bare cock into a pussy for the reasons mentioned but find it awkward when the girl squirms and wriggles out of the way or to one side when you start coming up from dining below to give her a kiss

Anyway, that's all I'm going to say before this turns into a Punch and Judy show (with or without the popcorn!)

Took a bit long to figure out how respond to your own lie, right? I’m not serving hundreds of people per week ( one of the reasons why my prices are higher as I prefer quality over quantity) so don’t worry P  I know exactly who you are, wrote this review on Sunday straight after your meet. You mentioned “Said she didn't want my cock near her pussy without a condom on it. Felt awkward.”  Now tell me you want me to upload the screenshots of our whatsapp messages where you asking me for this service and I clearly said no but once we meet you asking/trying to do again? That’s what you want dear P?
As I said I don’t mind about the reviews but if I’m getting slandered and facts are twisted there’s new other level and I won’t let that happen by some looser who has shitty life himself ( mentiong designer stuff and shamimg for the face features) and keeps leaving false reviews. Now go and cry how bad and “not tasty’’the girls that you punting are lol
Desperation as it’s worst. Wrong girl tho. 

[jakkee]

No he had micro penis ( which is alright as we all are different and I don’t judge people by how big they are ) and kept moaning and telling me how good oral is ( no teething was involved). And that he didn’t have sex for ages. As I mentioned on my post above the thing that pissed him off was that he wasn’t allowed to rib his bare cock in my pussy. He decided to go for an hour instead 2 and asked to give him half of his money back. Really should just have kicked the clown out, my bad. 
His other reviews about the girls look very similar to mine, everyone’s shit, he’s the one who’s unsatisfied lol

No worries, I'm glad you could provide your side too!

[Link7]

Welll well well. Love a bit of UKP drama. Throwback to the old days. 

Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see. Always worth remembering that folks..

[bst]

Upload the screenshots. You are probably on course for a banning simply because of the personal jibes, which would then give OP's suggestion that you mixed him up some validity. Screenshots would definitely help your cause.

[Billy no mates]

Upload the screenshots. You are probably on course for a banning simply because of the personal jibes, which would then give OP's suggestion that you mixed him up some validity. Screenshots would definitely help your cause.

I would recommend not uploading private messages to this forum, just to settle a disagreement. You have a good rate of positive reviews, including my own, you’ve told you side of the story, don’t get a reputation for outing private details.

[pretty little girl]

I would recommend not uploading private messages to this forum, just to settle a disagreement. You have a good rate of positive reviews, including my own, you’ve told you side of the story, don’t get a reputation for outing private details.

You’re actually right, as much as twisted facts dissapointing me and makes me fiery I’m leaving all this drama for my own  and my clients sake. People are not stupid and can decide themselves especially when its clear that all his reviews for the other girls are quite similar to mine.
Have a good lifted lockdown week boys. 

[bst]

don’t get a reputation for outing private details.

Should go without saying that she should edit his number out.

[Shadow314]

No mate, has been 220 since the first review,, the OP is mistaken with the 200. been on the HL since first review even though incalls were not available the 220 was on profile.

Interesting, I assumed a rise given the £200 quoted in the review, but does back up PLG's comment on a 2hr booking reduced to 1hr.
Not too sure what to make of the rest of the exchange

[Alexmck]

Pretty sure it was £200 although was couple of weeks ago so might be wrong.

[golden bull]

Micro penis🤣🤣😂😂😂 🪱 made me laugh 🥜

[Alexmck]

Hopefully we can draw a line - PLG has lot of good reviews. Mine wasn't quite as good as others. Those looking into her can form their own views. Also has me mixed up with someone else - says I saw her on Sunday but I saw her couple of weeks ago. Like to leave it a week or two to avoid overly glowy reveiws

[bst]

Do you still have the whatsapps from your booking?

[Alexmck]

Do you still have the whatsapps from your booking?

No. Deleted as I wasn't intending on going back

[8-VUU]

Micro penis🤣🤣😂😂😂 🪱 made me laugh 🥜

Two observations:
1. What are the odds that the user name “ Pretty Little Girl” was never selected by a punter, so the SP could select it to exactly match her AW profile?
2. Besides posting the whatsapp messages, OP can post a pic of his non-micro penis (or his micro penis) to prove his point.   

[jakkee]

Two observations:
1. What are the odds that the user name “ Pretty Little Girl” was never selected by a punter, so the SP could select it to exactly match her AW profile?

Are you trying to imply that this isn't the SP responding? and that it is someone pretending? I don't understand your argument, you can see when the account was created, the name was clearly free so the SP was free to take it, as would have been anyone else. It doesn't show anything either way. (Also this isn't a huge social media site, most usernames are free and I can't imagine many male punters going for this name in particular.)

I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be the real SP, I would also monitor my reviews if I were an SP - and if they feel like they've been unfairly represented, it's in their interest to give their side. To me it feels very unlikely that this is a troll impersonating the SP as you seem to suggest, they spend £20 in BTC just to say some randomer on the internet has a micropenis? lol.

2. Besides posting the whatsapp messages, OP can post a pic of his non-micro penis (or his micro penis) to prove his point.   

I don't know why people are so hot on coming in asking for screenshots. I think everyone can make their own judgement just by reading the conversation alone, as others have said, it wouldn't benefit the SP to upload private communications just to prove a point.

Anyway I don't want to take this thread any more off-topic than it already is. I think it's fair to say that whatever went down there was a misalignment of expectations and even with all this the review is still neutral. It doesn't put me off seeing the SP myself to get my own experiance.

[bst]

Screenshots from both sides, with the necessary editing for discretion purposes, would tell us whether what is at play here is:
a) PLG is mistaken who OP is.
or
b) OP is an undesirable who left a neutral review with plenty of omissions in relation to context and added negative elements, out of "revenge"

That's all. Nothing deeper than than.

[pretty little girl]

Still bullshitting P arent you?
I know what Im doing and who Im meeting. You messed up so bad as majority of my bookings go through aw or phone calls. Whatsapp is my last preference. Im only doing incalls in airbnb two weeks so far and seen a few new ones. None of them were from whatsapp and none of them were 1 hour.
And yes yes you deleted your whatsapp hahaha . I was actually very close to share a screenshots and my last message was to you asking about your post on ukp. But as expected it didn’t go through as you blocked. The whole chat was about 2 hours booking, can I rub my cock and you arriving to my place on 16th of May (Sunday) . It’s impossible myself to make the things up. As I got some pm from my people advising me not to do that online. But it doesnt mean that I wont show it in reality. everyone’s asking for it will see it whatsapp conversation.
That’s it, enough is enough. He defo didn’t expect that from me at all as the way how he see sps is like some sort of idiots who can’t understand what’s going on, desperate needs money as are single mums and can’t stand for themselves when he’s chatting a lie about them. ( none of then apply to me)  But in reality some of them are more educated than himself and sex worker job can be very enjoyable with the right clients.  Now go and rub your dick into wall

[bst]

I am confused what all this advice and talk against posting screenshots is about.

You take a screenshot and draw over the punter's number and picture (if he has one). I see this as common practice on this site.

As far as I see it, screenshots or end. OP can just continue to claim that you are mistaken.

[8-VUU]

Are you trying to imply that this isn't the SP responding? and that it is someone pretending? I don't understand your argument, you can see when the account was created, the name was clearly free so the SP was free to take it, as would have been anyone else. It doesn't show anything either way. (Also this isn't a huge social media site, most usernames are free and I can't imagine many male punters going for this name in particular.)

I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be the real SP, I would also monitor my reviews if I were an SP - and if they feel like they've been unfairly represented, it's in their interest to give their side. To me it feels very unlikely that this is a troll impersonating the SP as you seem to suggest, they spend £20 in BTC just to say some randomer on the internet has a micropenis? lol.

I don't know why people are so hot on coming in asking for screenshots. I think everyone can make their own judgement just by reading the conversation alone, as others have said, it wouldn't benefit the SP to upload private communications just to prove a point.

Anyway I don't want to take this thread any more off-topic than it already is. I think it's fair to say that whatever went down there was a misalignment of expectations and even with all this the review is still neutral. It doesn't put me off seeing the SP myself to get my own experiance.

Not at all. I think SP is genuine and has defended herself. I had a hard time finding a witty screen name, and would have found it humorous to have a punter adopt “Pretty Little Girl” and then write reviews. I don’t think postings of any kind are necessary to prove either position. Although it would be interesting to find out if admin would allow posting pics of 🍆 to prove a point.

BTW SP goes on my HL next time I can get into London!

[finn5555]

I think micro penis has been caught out 

[golden bull]

Two observations:
1. What are the odds that the user name “ Pretty Little Girl” was never selected by a punter, so the SP could select it to exactly match her AW profile?
2. Besides posting the whatsapp messages, OP can post a pic of his non-micro penis (or his micro penis) to prove his point.   

😁..... and have a pound coin next to it so we can gauge the size.... zoom in after if we have to😁🤣

[Alexmck]

😁..... and have a pound coin next to it so we can gauge the size.... zoom in after if we have to😁🤣

5p coin sufficient

[golden bull]

5p coin sufficient

5p coin, £1 coin, doesn’t matter. Notes would suffice too, especially if you put it next to Liz😁👍.

[Londonlad40]

Well what a thread. As and when I return to to requesting a booking I will be in touch with plg . It’s been a while and admire her ‘brand defence’. Hope she is ok with meeting an old git who is 2.5 times her age 🙏

[boomting_]

I would love to see this PLG but shes out of my price range. If she lowered her price then I might be tempted to break the bank for this one...

-WISHFUL THINKING-

[Billy no mates]

Hope she is ok with meeting an old git who is 2.5 times her age

She was certainly happy enough to meet me and I’m more than that.

[cotton]

So i guess the obvious question is , from the review when PLT  "Said she didn't want my cock near her pussy without a condom on it. Felt awkward."

What was awkward about it ?

[Londonlad40]

She was certainly happy enough to meet me and I’m more than that.

Thanks Billy

[hamchang]

So we have established a few things then.

1 - Boundary pushes who are rejected often mark down a review because their unreasonable "requests" were declined
2 - Well regarded hookers should have polite right of reply
3 - There is such a thing as "too many lip fillers".

[Alexmck]

So i guess the obvious question is , from the review when PLT  "Said she didn't want my cock near her pussy without a condom on it. Felt awkward."

What was awkward about it ?

She wriggled to one side and up the bed

[golden bull]

I was at first on her side but after reading her outburst on another review of her recently which was rated a positive I’m inclined to believe she’s a bit unhinged.

[bst]

Well again she is claiming once again it's a false review/false details.
We will eventially get to the bottom of this and who is telling the truth; someone will slip up.