Author Topic: Sexy Jennifer - Glasgow (Originally arranged with Ruby princess AGAIN !!)  (Read 2554 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6017305) (0 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by nike]
2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6040915) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by nike]

Offline Aa746

So last time i had arranged a meet with Ruby princess because she looks abs stunning but instead i got to see natasha which still ended with a really good punt.

£80 30 mins
merchant city

This time I arranged with ruby again because i really wanted to see her and made sure via text that i see ruby and no one else. When i got there another girl (sexy jennifer) opened the door and tbh she looked very nice.

I didnt question the switch (yeah im stupid) :dash:

before handing the cash i asked if im getting owo with fk and she said yeah. Gave cash and she went away and i went bathroom to wash my hands.

She came back took clothes off and it wasn't really an attractive body. at this point i realised this was gonna be shite. Horrible saggy tits. strecth marks on tits and tummy. has a scar above her vagina which made me think she might have been a guy.

Started with owo which was only done for 30 seconds and was shite. teeth touching nd all that.

started with reverse cowgirl and was not really that good. switched to mish, then her on top then finished in mish again.

every time i would ask for a position change would give me a shit reply.

in and out in 15 mins.

i was ok with it last time because the swtich was made up for by providing an excellent service by natasha

this time im pissed because i was given a shit service.

not gonna go back. no more punting this month for me. taking a break. missing my hand.

sexy jennifer External Link/Members Only

ruby princess External Link/Members Only

Offline DaVINCI

Thanks for the review, l wouldn’t see her but do you think her photos have been photoshopped?

Offline GlasgowMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 324
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 13
Excellent review again Aa746, thanks for that.
Banned reason: Not the site for you, bye
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Spikey

Thanks for heads up Aa746, absolutely dreadful.😡 One I'll be avoiding.

Natasha certainly looks and sounds very good.😊
« Last Edit: February 12, 2021, 11:46:33 pm by Spikey »

Offline colin_w

Thanks for the review, so basically it is pot luck with the Brazilians, I did a quick search on AW, there are 13 in the city centre, book one and you have a 1 in 13 chance it might be that one.

Offline Aa746

Thanks for the review, l wouldn’t see her but do you think her photos have been photoshopped?

The only thing thing accurate in her pics is the face. The body is 1000 percent photoshoped

Offline Hugh12

Thanks for the warning. I had quite fancied paying her a visit but definitely not now. She looks hot in her profile as well. A bullet dodged.

Offline DaVINCI

The only thing thing accurate in her pics is the face. The body is 1000 percent photoshoped
Thanks  :thumbsup: at least with B&S you can walk away at the door, once the readies are handed over and you see the body all stretch n saggy it can become difficult.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2021, 05:13:27 pm by DaVINCI »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Thanks for your reviews OP... :thumbsup:

What I think you should maybe have done is review Ruby Princess separately and Neg her for B&S... When you type in her ID number into search bar it shows her as a Neg for this review, but as a Pos for the other review (because you posted her link as part of the review) ...

A B&S IMO should be reviewed as the WG that B&S you, which I think warrants a Neg... Review the others as you wish... :hi:
« Last Edit: February 13, 2021, 05:41:40 pm by Clattypats »

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
The common consensus on UKP...as Clatty has alluded to....is that a B&S should warrant an automatic negative in all cases. :hi: